A Transatlantic Evidentiary Enterprise — SWANK London LLC (USA) x SWANK London Ltd (UK)
✧ Filed with Deliberate Punctuation ✧
“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Chromatic v NHS Trusts (PC-117): On the Bureaucracy of Medical Indifference


⟡ FORMAL COMPLAINT – PHSO INVESTIGATION REQUEST ⟡

Filed: 21 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/NHS/OMB-DISABILITY-DISCRIMINATION-2025
Download PDF: 2025-05-21_Core_PC-117_NHSTrusts-OMB_DisabilityDiscrimination-MedicalNeglect.pdf
Summary: Formal complaint submitted to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) against Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) and Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (CWH)for systemic disability discrimination, medical neglect, and falsified safeguarding referrals. The complaint consolidates SWANK’s evidentiary portfolio into a single institutional indictment — one that converts personal harm into jurisdictional proof.

I. What Happened

On 21 May 2025, Polly Chromatic (legally Noelle Bonnee Annee Simlett) submitted a formal complaint to the PHSO, requesting investigation into severe and continuing misconduct by both GSTT and CWH.

The submission cited:
• Denial of emergency treatment for eosinophilic asthma following exposure to sewer gas;
• False intoxication allegations by GSTT staff at St Thomas’ Hospital A&E;
• Verbal assault by a member of the public within the A&E waiting area, followed by a racially charged safeguarding referral against the patient rather than the aggressor;
• Repeated refusal by Chelsea & Westminster A&E to provide appropriate intervention, resulting in prolonged medical risk;
• Breaches of the Equality Act 2010 due to disregard for written-only communication adjustments prescribed under psychiatric recommendation.

Each act of neglect became a brick in a procedural edifice of cruelty.

II. What the Document Establishes

• That both Trusts displayed institutional discrimination — failing to accommodate disability and punishing lawful self-advocacy.
• That medical neglect evolved into administrative retaliation, culminating in unlawful safeguarding referrals.
• That the claimant’s family stability was deliberately compromised through false narratives and procedural deceit.
• That the NHS trusts involved engaged in an aesthetic of compassion while practising an architecture of harm.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

• To document the formal transfer of jurisdiction from individual complaint to systemic investigation.
• To memorialise the exact moment medical negligence became legal evidence.
• To assert that trauma, when recorded, becomes governance.
• Because the Ombudsman’s inbox is now an evidentiary altar — and this letter its offering.

IV. Legal & Ethical Framework

Domestic Statutes:
• Equality Act 2010, ss. 20, 21, 29 – duty to make reasonable adjustments and prohibit discrimination in public service delivery.
• Human Rights Act 1998, Arts. 3, 6, 8 – protection from degrading treatment, fair process, and interference with family life.
• NHS Constitution – principles of dignity, fairness, and informed care.

Regulatory Scope:
• Parliamentary & Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) – empowered to investigate maladministration, discrimination, and denial of patient rights.
• NHS Resolution – accountable for compensation claims arising from negligence and discrimination.

V. SWANK’s Position

“Neglect, repeated enough times, becomes design.”

SWANK London Ltd. recognises this complaint as the structural apex of medical retaliation: where care collapses into bureaucracy and harm disguises itself as help.
The filing transforms institutional misconduct into a living document — one that testifies, elegantly, to the administrative banality of cruelty.

Where hospitals wrote fiction, SWANK wrote record.

⟡ This Entry Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected.
This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with deliberate punctuation, preserved for litigation and education.

Because healthcare deserves accountability.
And harm deserves publication.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.