Eric and Jess Came Over. They Saw Ballet Shoes and Boxes. They Wrote a Book About Trauma (And Invented a Urine Bin).

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 12 July 2023
WE WERE NEVER ASSESSED. WE WERE OBSERVED AND JUDGED.
Also Titled: “Eric and Jess Came Over. They Saw Ballet Shoes and Boxes. They Wrote a Book About Trauma (And Invented a Urine Bin).”

Filed Under: Social Worker Surveillance, Narrative Fabrication, Health Disregard, Observation Bias, Fictional Evidence, RBKC Gaslighting, Legal Pre-Lit

---

🏷️ Subject: RBKC Initial Contact

Conducted by: Eric Wedge-Bull & Jessica Miller
Sanctioned by: Robert Young, Gatekeeper of the Imaginary

---

🧾 Allegation:

“We received a police report… cannabis… shouting… a bin filled with urine…”

🧻 Let’s pause here:

THERE WAS NO URINE BIN.

None.
Not present.
Not visible.
Not documented by anyone who attended the home.

But it made its way into the official record — because social work, in this case, prefers the literary genre of fictional hygiene horror over actual observation.

---

🎭 What Was Actually Observed:

• A family preparing for a move

• Boxes — naturally.

• Children: articulate, engaged, joyful

• No cannabis

• No signs of neglect

• No distress

• No “urine bin”

• Just a chronically ill mother doing her best while stalked by bureaucratic nonsense

---

👩‍👧‍👦 The Children:

• Described their mum as loving, warm, supportive

• Shared stories of ballet, gymnastics, coding, gardening, play

• One child said: “Mummy does everything for us.”

• Another said: “We hug her when she’s sad.”

No fear. No confusion. Just familial tenderness.
Which, of course, the system mistrusts.

---

📚 The Narrative Pivot:

“Three police referrals…”
“She gets angry…”
“There might be trauma…”
“She should probably get therapy…”
“And — again — there was allegedly a urine bin…”

Because when abuse can’t be found, the state will reach for metaphor.

---

🧠 Let Us Be Very Clear:

This was not an “assessment.”
It was speculative surveillance disguised as support.

And where truth didn’t cooperate, fiction filled the gaps.

---

🧾 Conclusion:

• No cannabis use by the mother

• No risk to the children

• No urine bin — just a lie printed in a PDF

• No distress — except the kind caused by being repeatedly watched, questioned, and gaslit by the very agencies assigned to “help”

---

Noelle Meline
Diagnosed. Documented. Defamed. Still standing.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

---

Labels: snobby, serious, SWANK tribunal, fictional evidence, made-up urine bin, Eric Wedge-Bull, Jessica Miller, RBKC misconduct, asthma ignored, trauma spectacle, home education bias, narrative distortion, legal escalation pending

She Couldn’t Breathe, So They Made Her Repeat Herself. Again.

 📎 SWANK Dispatch: Repetition as Retaliation — We've Already Been Assessed

🗓️ 3 March 2024

Filed Under: repeated assessments, recycled allegations, RBKC child protection abuse, respiratory discrimination, Section 47 misuse, Samira Issa misconduct, safeguarding as punishment, police and hospital cleared, social work overreach, verbal coercion of disabled parent

---

“We did this already.
Twice.
You just didn’t like the outcome.”
— Polly Chromatic, chronically ill mother facing a third assessment for the same 2022 concerns

---

In this terse, precise letter dated 3 March 2024, Noelle Meline addresses the sustained institutional harassment led by Samira Issa, social worker at RBKC, who escalated a case based on medically-triggered communication difficulties and already-resolved allegations from 2022.

Despite:

• A full assessment in November 2022

• A second full assessment in June 2023

• No action by police

• No findings by hospital staff

• And documented health conditions impairing her ability to speak

Samira continues to escalate based on claims that have already been addressed — and disproven.

---

📄 I. A Breakdown of the Pattern

• Nurses: “We have no concerns.”

• Then: “She may be intoxicated.”

• Then: “She left the children alone.” (She didn’t.)

• Now: “Concerns from 2022.” (Addressed. Twice.)

And all of it ignored the fact that Polly was acutely ill and had informed them repeatedly that she could not speak.

---

🧠 II. Her Children Are Educated — That's the Problem

• They are homeschooled across global curricula

• They engage regularly in cultural and community activities

• They have already discussed sensitive topics in past assessments — including family history

But that intellectual sovereignty appears to be threatening to systems that thrive on compliance.

---

🧾 SWANK Commentary

Disability became a reason
to question her parenting.
Intelligence became a reason
to assume danger.
Repetition became
institutional punishment.

When you demand that a breathless mother
repeat herself for the third time —
you’re not safeguarding.
You’re interrogating.

---

Samira’s Mum Spoke for Her. I Spoke for Myself — with Evidence.

 📬 SWANK Dispatch: I Scheduled an Appointment with a Social Worker — She Showed Up with Her Mum

🗓️ 25 February 2024

Filed Under: safeguarding fraud, retaliatory referral, hospital cover-up, verbal silence as misconduct, social worker incompetence, Section 47 abuse, systemic cruelty, institutional escalation, RBKC gaslighting

---

“She said she’d come with a colleague.
She brought her mum.”
— A Sick Mother Who Had Already Filed a Hospital Complaint

---

On 4 February 2024, Polly Chromatic was hospitalised with eosinophilic asthma. Instead of medical care, she received suspicion: hospital staff — failing to understand her condition — filed a false safeguarding referral alleging erratic behaviour and possible intoxication.

What followed was a bureaucratic theatre of errors orchestrated by Samira Issa, a social worker at RBKC Family Services.

Despite:

• Already being familiar with Polly’s case

• Knowing the referral was medically misinformed

• Being told Polly could not speak due to asthma

• Being clearly informed of ongoing complaints and legal action

Samira opened a Section 47 enquiry — escalating the matter from suspicion to “investigation” — under false pretences.

---

👀 What Actually Happened

• Samira confirmed in writing she’d be attending the visit with a colleague

• Instead, she arrived with an unnamed woman, who turned out to be her mother

• Samira did not speak during the visit

• Her mother conducted the entire visit, questioning Polly’s children about homeschooling — not about the hospital referral

• No ID, no procedural documents, no reference to the actual concern

---

📂 What Noelle Documented

• Email proof of Samira lying about attending with a professional colleague

• Full correspondence with timestamps confirming harassment and disregard for medical condition

• Video evidence of the unprofessional home visit:

  • Clip 1

  • Clip 2

  • Clip 3

  • Clip 4

• Audio evidence of the hospital misconduct that triggered it all:

  • Nurse audio, Westminster & Chelsea A&E, 4 Feb

---

⚖️ Why This Matters

• Section 47 powers are serious: they’re used when a child is at risk of significant harm

• Invoking one without cause — especially when retaliation is involved — is procedural abuse

• Bringing a family member to a safeguarding visit instead of a registered social worker violates every standard of professional conduct

---

🧾 SWANK Commentary

You were told I couldn’t speak.
You were told I was filing complaints.
You were told this was a retaliation case.

So you brought your mother.

And still — not one word from you.

---

Why My Children Never Want to Speak to a Social Worker Again

 📬 SWANK Dispatch: He Said He’d Restore Our Faith in Social Work. Instead, He Traumatised My Children in Public.

🗓️ 5 January 2024

Filed Under: public interrogation, child distress, coercive safeguarding, RBKC misconduct, sewer gas ignored, asthma requests dismissed, assessment failure, social worker surveillance, adultism, mother-blame culture

---

“He said he’d restore our faith.
Instead, he interrogated my sons on a playground.
In front of their new friends.
Without me there.
Now they call it abuse.”
— A Mother Who’s Had Enough of Empty Promises and Repeated Harm

---

This formal letter from Polly Chromatic to Rebecca Webber of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea documents a disturbing interaction on 5 July 2023, when social workers Eric Wedge-Bull and Jess visited her family’s new home at 37 Elgin Crescent.

What was promised as a rebuilding of trust became yet another violation of boundaries, dignity, and psychological safety.

---

👦🏽 I. Public Interrogation as “Assessment”

• Eric asked Polly to leave her sons, Kingdom and Prerogative, with him at the community garden playground

• He questioned them without consent, in front of peers and adults

• The children returned visibly shaken

• They later described Eric’s approach as aggressive and humiliating

• The community later reprimanded Polly for bringing outside professionals into the shared space — a detail that adds to the emotional fallout and isolation

---

🫁 II. Ignored Requests, Unfinished Assessments

Despite Polly asking Jess for:

• Help with medical counselling for eosinophilic asthma

• Legal support to change their names

No follow-up was ever sent.
No formal report was issued until months later, and only after Noelle emailed chasing it in response to a hospital-instigated safeguarding referral.

The report had clearly never been finished.
Eric apologised — but the damage was done.
Repeated patterns of ghosting, abandonment, and surveillance had returned yet again.

---

🧠 III. What This Mother Knows

• She’s been working with children since age 10

• Formerly a teacher, daycare worker, nanny

• Still in contact with the mothers of all the families she’s cared for

• Repeatedly praised by neighbours and community members for her parenting

• Not a single community member has raised concerns — only distant professionals operating on projections

---

✋ IV. The Demand

“My children do not want to be questioned again.
We are not supported by social workers.
We experience them as abusive.”

Polly states clearly: leave us alone.
Her children were abused by social workers in Turks and Caicos, and their most recent encounter in London has left them retraumatised.

---

SWANK Summary:

He came to repair trust.
He broke it further.

They asked for asthma support.
They got silence.

They offered openness.
They received surveillance.

Now they’re closing the door — and writing it down.

---