I Told You I Couldn't Breathe — You Called That a Concern

 📎 SWANK Dispatch: Two Assessments Already Done. She’s Still Escalating.

🗓️ 3 March 2024

Filed Under: assessment repetition, respiratory discrimination, safeguarding escalation, RBKC misconduct, Section 47 abuse, medical dismissal, parenting criminalised, 2022 allegations recycled, Samira Issa pattern, facts ignored, disability weaponised

---

“We already did this.
Twice.”
— Polly Chromatic, who keeps being investigated for things she’s already disproven

---

In this direct response to Samira Issa, dated 3 March 2024, Polly Chromatic reminds RBKC that:

• Two full social work assessments were already completed:

  • One in November 2022

  • Another in June 2023

• The concerns now being cited are recycled from 2022 and already addressed

• The hospital made no formal findings, and police took no action

So why the escalation?

Because Polly tried to explain — multiple times — that she couldn’t speak due to acute eosinophilic asthma.

That’s it.

She couldn't breathe.
So they opened a Section 47.

---

🗂️ I. Timeline of Contradictions

• Nurses said they had no concerns

• Then they claimed possible intoxication — never medically evaluated

• Then social workers said the concern was leaving her kids alone — though she had a friend stay with them

• Then suddenly the concerns were from 2022, already assessed twice

---

👩‍🎓 II. Parenting as Punishment

Polly also notes that:

• Her children are highly educated, well-travelled, and active in their community

• They’ve already discussed family topics in two prior assessments

• They are regularly engaged in educational and social activities outside the home

Yet somehow — these facts don’t register in the eyes of RBKC.

Because the goal isn’t truth.
It’s compliance through confusion.

---

🧾 SWANK Commentary

You ask for answers
and then ignore the ones already given.

You say there are new concerns
but they’re dated from two years ago.

You say she’s uncooperative —
because she’s gasping for air.

And you call that
child protection.

---

If You Can’t Postpone the Meeting, You’d Better Write Down Why

 📎 SWANK Dispatch: The Mapping Document Is Not a Weapon

🗓️ 29 February 2024

Filed Under: legal rights ignored, social worker coercion, Mapping Document misconduct, disability discrimination, GP treatment delay, safeguarding misuse, procedural weaponisation, RBKC escalation, Samira Issa misconduct

---

“The only part of the Mapping Document
you’ve completed so far
is the timeline
of your own negligence.”
— Polly Chromatic, writing under legal and clinical instruction

---

This letter, dated 29 February 2024, was written by Polly Chromatic to Samira Issa, requesting a legal and medically justified postponement of a pending child protection meeting.

Polly’s lawyer and GP both supported the request, citing:

• Her need for hospital treatment and aftercare

• The requirement that Samira fill out her section of the Mapping Document first, per procedural fairness

• The legal necessity of written explanation if postponement was to be refused

Samira had, up to that point, refused to provide justification for forcing a meeting on a parent who was medically unwell and legally advised to delay.

---

🧾 SWANK Commentary

When a mother is
breathless, bedridden,
and backed by both a lawyer and GP —

but still
you hand her a form and a threat —
you’re no longer safeguarding children.
You’re performing power.

And performance has no place
in child protection.

---

Samira’s Mum Spoke for Her. I Spoke for Myself — with Evidence.

 📬 SWANK Dispatch: I Scheduled an Appointment with a Social Worker — She Showed Up with Her Mum

🗓️ 25 February 2024

Filed Under: safeguarding fraud, retaliatory referral, hospital cover-up, verbal silence as misconduct, social worker incompetence, Section 47 abuse, systemic cruelty, institutional escalation, RBKC gaslighting

---

“She said she’d come with a colleague.
She brought her mum.”
— A Sick Mother Who Had Already Filed a Hospital Complaint

---

On 4 February 2024, Polly Chromatic was hospitalised with eosinophilic asthma. Instead of medical care, she received suspicion: hospital staff — failing to understand her condition — filed a false safeguarding referral alleging erratic behaviour and possible intoxication.

What followed was a bureaucratic theatre of errors orchestrated by Samira Issa, a social worker at RBKC Family Services.

Despite:

• Already being familiar with Polly’s case

• Knowing the referral was medically misinformed

• Being told Polly could not speak due to asthma

• Being clearly informed of ongoing complaints and legal action

Samira opened a Section 47 enquiry — escalating the matter from suspicion to “investigation” — under false pretences.

---

👀 What Actually Happened

• Samira confirmed in writing she’d be attending the visit with a colleague

• Instead, she arrived with an unnamed woman, who turned out to be her mother

• Samira did not speak during the visit

• Her mother conducted the entire visit, questioning Polly’s children about homeschooling — not about the hospital referral

• No ID, no procedural documents, no reference to the actual concern

---

📂 What Noelle Documented

• Email proof of Samira lying about attending with a professional colleague

• Full correspondence with timestamps confirming harassment and disregard for medical condition

• Video evidence of the unprofessional home visit:

  • Clip 1

  • Clip 2

  • Clip 3

  • Clip 4

• Audio evidence of the hospital misconduct that triggered it all:

  • Nurse audio, Westminster & Chelsea A&E, 4 Feb

---

⚖️ Why This Matters

• Section 47 powers are serious: they’re used when a child is at risk of significant harm

• Invoking one without cause — especially when retaliation is involved — is procedural abuse

• Bringing a family member to a safeguarding visit instead of a registered social worker violates every standard of professional conduct

---

🧾 SWANK Commentary

You were told I couldn’t speak.
You were told I was filing complaints.
You were told this was a retaliation case.

So you brought your mother.

And still — not one word from you.

---

They Showed Up at My Home with No Authority, No Name, and No Questions About the Referral

 📼 SWANK Dispatch: Samira Brought Her Mum. I Brought Receipts.

🗓️ 25 February 2024

Filed Under: unannounced home intrusion, social worker misconduct, safeguarding manipulation, hospital retaliation, Section 47 abuse, verbal ambush, disability dismissal, mother as proxy, legal boundaries crossed, audio-video evidence

---

“Samira didn’t say a word.
Her mother spoke the entire time.
They asked my children about homeschooling —
not about the hospital report.”
— A Mother Still Recovering from the Asthma Attack That Started It All

---

This complaint was submitted by Polly Chromatic directly to Glen Peache, Director of Family Services for Kensington and Chelsea, and copied to every senior safeguarding authority and hospital implicated in the false safeguarding referral initiated after Polly’s emergency asthma hospital visit on 4 February 2024.

Instead of investigating the allegation supposedly reported by hospital staff — namely that she appeared “intoxicated” — the social worker, Samira Issa, arrived at her home accompanied by an unnamed woman (later revealed to be her mother).

Samira Issa said nothing.
Her mother — a total stranger to Noelle — did all the talking.
No questions about the report.
No clarification.
Just veiled accusations and insinuations aimed at her children.

---

🛑 I. What They Were Meant to Investigate

• Hospital staff claimed Noelle was “erratic” and “possibly intoxicated”

• A referral was made to RBKC Children’s Services

• A Section 47 enquiry was opened, allegedly justified by hospital concern and the “frequency of referrals”

---

🚨 II. What Actually Happened

• Samira Issa showed up at 2 Periwinkle Gardens, a Westminster address, not RBKC

• She brought her mother instead of a professional colleague

• No effort was made to verify the allegations from the hospital

• Instead, the children were questioned about homeschooling

• No documents, no official identification, no procedural safeguards

• Polly has never spoken to Samira's mother before and was given no introduction

---

🎥 III. Receipts & Retaliation

Polly provided extensive documentation, including:

• 📼 Full audio recording of the hospital incident: YouTube

• 📹 Four separate videos documenting the home intrusion by Samira and her mother:

  • Clip 1

  • Clip 2

  • Clip 3

  • Clip 4

---

🧾 IV. SWANK Commentary

They didn’t bring a file.
They didn’t bring a form.
They didn’t bring a question.

They brought a woman’s mother to a legal safeguarding visit —
and thought that was professional.

This is what happens when truth gets too sharp:
they stop trying to answer it,
and start trying to discredit the person holding it.

---