🧾 SWANK Dispatch: I Didn't Relocate — You Just Lied
🗓️ 24 October 2020
Filed Under: false relocation claim, sexual abuse cover-up, social worker evasion, psychological evaluation, truancy distortion, homeschool retaliation, DSD negligence, environmental trauma, institutional gaslighting
“They touched my children without consent.
Then claimed they couldn’t find us.
While calling me on the same number I’ve had since 2016.”
— A Mother Who’s Been ‘Relocated’ Without Ever Moving House
This 6-page memorandum to Mark Fulford of F Chambers is a bombshell of misconduct, denial, and bureaucratic revisionism.
In it, Polly Chromatic traces the systematic erasure and distortion of traumatic incidents, including:
• Sexual abuse of her children during an unconsented medical examination
• Fabricated claims of relocation to excuse DSD’s abandonment of the case
• Contradictory timelines from official reports and emails
• A full rebuttal of false educational neglect claims
• Evidence of DSD’s continued harassment despite full compliance
🧠 I. The “Relocation” Myth
Despite being present, reachable, and compliant, DSD repeatedly claimed:
“The family had relocated”
“They were unable to complete assessment”
“They could not locate the mother”
Meanwhile:
She was living at the same Palm Grove address
She had the same phone number since 2016
She was home ill during 2018 — not missing
DSD had previously visited her there — on record
“If they couldn’t find me, why didn’t they call me?”
“They did. Many times.”
👩⚖️ II. What She Documents
Medical assault of her sons with no consent and no privacy
Clear motive to cover up this by claiming an incomplete investigation
Constant homeschool obstruction, despite written approvals
Threats to inspect children’s notebooks — even though all learning is digital
Mould-related illness from uninhabitable conditions in Providenciales
Interference in home renovations used to justify safeguarding action
Fabricated safeguarding concerns based on sightings during "school hours"
One-sided “psychological evaluations” that were never returned
⚠️ III. Why This Letter Exists
Because institutional memory loss is not a clerical issue — it is a weapon.
And this letter ensures that:
Every lie is dated
Every contradiction is documented
Every abuse is followed by a name and a timestamp