⟡ Parliament Was Notified. Oversight Formally Requested. ⟡
“This is no longer a local safeguarding error. This is the systemic abuse of legal power — by the state, against a disabled family.”
Filed: 29 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/PARLIAMENT/OVERSIGHT-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-29_SWANK_Parliament_RequestForOversight_SafeguardingAbuse_ByStateActors.pdf
A formal request for parliamentary oversight submitted to MP Munira Wilson. The document outlines a coordinated pattern of safeguarding misuse by multiple public bodies, supported by legal filings and medical evidence. Parliament was placed on record.
I. What Happened
On 29 May 2025, Polly Chromatic, Director of SWANK London Ltd., submitted a formal request for parliamentary review to Munira Wilson MP, as part of ongoing public interest exposure of safeguarding abuse against a disabled family.
The letter outlines:
Criminal misuse of safeguarding powers
Evidence of collusion between social workers, police, and NHS Trusts
Repeated breach of written-only medical adjustments
Ongoing retaliation in response to civil and regulatory complaints
Enclosed legal claims including a £23M damages action and Judicial Review
Active referrals to IOPC, SWE, and DPS
This was not a grievance letter. It was a jurisdictional escalation, sent with evidence, under constitutional right.
II. What the Filing Establishes
That Parliament has now been notified of criminal safeguarding abuse by public servants
That the abuse is documented, repeated, and cross-institutional
That the request is grounded in civil, medical, and statutory authority
That future claims of “unawareness” by government actors are now foreclosed
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when safeguarding becomes surveillance,
When medical need becomes threat,
And when silence becomes the state’s primary language —
The record must be taken from them.
Parliament has been told.
They may ignore it.
But they will not be able to deny its filing.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept safeguarding as soft power.
We do not accept cross-agency collusion as professional error.
We do not accept a Parliament that only acts after harm becomes permanent.
SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If the government permits it,
We document it.
If the MPs fail to intervene,
We file that too.
And if the public never hears —
We remain the record of what they chose not to say.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.