⟡ The Doctor Laughed. The Social Worker Watched. And Then They Said It Didn’t Happen. ⟡
When disbelief isn’t clinical — it’s coordinated.
Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-02
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_DisabilityDisbeliefIncident_SMH.pdf
An email submitted to multiple agencies detailing real-time discrimination against a disabled parent by NHS and safeguarding actors — while witnesses remained silent.
I. What Happened
At St Mary’s Hospital, a disabled mother was subjected to verbal disbelief, medical bullying, and complete dismissal of her daughter's documented diagnoses.
Instead of clinical care, she received gaslighting.
Instead of social work support, she received silence.
Kirsty Hornal and Sarah Newman were included in the communication — not one intervened.
This is the mother’s own account, sent the same day. Timestamps do not lie.
II. What the Email Establishes
That a medical incident of discrimination and disbelief occurred in a public institution
That multiple safeguarding officials were made aware of it in writing
That no corrective or safeguarding measures were taken in response
That disability rights were treated as optional, not legal
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because documentation is our defence against selective memory.
Because when witnesses ignore, they become participants.
And because no one should be mocked for struggling to breathe — especially not in front of professionals.
IV. Violations Identified
Disability Discrimination in a Medical Setting
Failure of Duty to Protect by Safeguarding Officials
Medical Negligence in Emergency Context
Retaliatory Disbelief of Documented Illness
Institutional Silence in the Face of Abuse
V. SWANK’s Position
This was not an isolated incident — it was a convergence.
Medical negligence, social worker indifference, and complete institutional alignment.
The mother spoke — in writing, immediately, and with witnesses.
They chose to ignore it.
We chose to publish it.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.