“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label truancy retaliation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label truancy retaliation. Show all posts

This Signature Was Apparently Invisible

 📠 SWANK Dispatch: The Department Gave Me Permission. Then Pretended It Never Happened.

🗓️ September 2020

Filed Under: homeschool authorisation, official approval, parental compliance, education records, false truancy claims, institutional gaslighting, paperwork denial, bureaucratic contradiction, evidence of consent

“This is the signature of Edgar Howell.
This is the letter that made me legal.
This is what they pretended they never received.”
— A Mother Who Didn’t Just Register. She Got the Receipt.

This letter, titled “Polly Chromatic – Approval to Home School 2020”, is the Department of Education’s formal response to her submission. It is signed by Director Edgar Howell and explicitly confirms that her home education application was approved.

It is:

  • Official

  • On letterhead

  • Signed

  • Specific

  • Addressed to Polly

  • Dated

  • Issued by the education authority

And yet —

She was still visited.
Still threatened.
Still told she had failed to comply.

📎 I. Let the Record State:

  • Noelle was granted full approval to homeschool her children

  • She followed all protocols

  • She received written confirmation

  • No further action should have been taken against her family regarding education

  • Every “concern” expressed after this letter becomes a matter of state misconduct


No comments:

3.5 Years of Evidence They Never Wanted to See

 📚 SWANK Dispatch: The Timeline They Ignored

🗓️ 14 July 2020

Filed Under: institutional gaslighting, timeline of abuse, report withholding, homeschool approval ignored, sexual misconduct, illegal entry, pandemic violations, educational interference, maternal advocacy

“I don’t need to try so hard to prove myself?”
Then why have I been investigated non-stop, forced to submit income, degrees, and curriculum — and never once received a report?”
— A Mother with a Timeline. And a Law Degree’s Worth of Patience.

This 9-page, legislatively cited timeline is Noelle Bonneannée’s final attempt to turn relentless surveillance into lawful accountability.

Addressed to Ashley Adams-Forbes, it chronicles every visit, violation, retaliation, and lie from November 2016 to July 2020, culminating in a letter that could easily double as a legal brief.

🗂️ I. This Is Not a Case. This Is a Siege.

  • 2017: Her boys were sexually assaulted by a doctor during a forced exam

  • 2017–2020: Harassed despite confirmed homeschool approval

  • 2019: Social workers dismantled her fence to illegally enter

  • 2020: Entered her home during lockdown against COVID emergency powers

  • 2020: Despite requests, no report has ever been provided

“I should be innocent until proven guilty.”
“Instead, I have been treated as guilty without cause — and without explanation.”

🧑‍🏫 II. She Homeschools. They Pretend Not to Know.

From Mark Garland’s confirmation to repeated curriculum submissions, every legal step was followed.

• Homeschool curriculum sent in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
• Degrees provided upon request
• Proof of income supplied
• Truancy officers still appeared
• Social workers still interrogated her
• The Department still failed to update its records or close its case

💥 III. The Department’s Greatest Hits (of Lawbreaking)

  • Defacing property

  • Threats from neighbours ignored

  • Fence destruction

  • Medical abuse

  • Pandemic violation

  • Harassment during grocery trips

  • Institutional gaslighting

  • No legal closure

✍️ IV. Her Questions Deserve Answers

  1. What is the purpose of each case?

  2. What is the solution?

  3. How can we move on with our lives?

The Department offers no answers — only more surveillance.


No comments:

Formal Proof, Informal Platform — When Messenger Became the Ministry

 📱 SWANK Dispatch: Exhibit A Confirmed — The Facebook Files

🗓️ Dated Evidence: June 2017

Filed Under: digital records, educational compliance, neglected documentation, truancy retaliation, government inaccessibility, homeschool approval, informal formality

“If Messenger conversations can be used against mothers, they can certainly be used to protect them.”
— A Mother Who Screenshot Her Way Through Stonewalls

With the release of “2017.06 Mark Facebook.pdf”, Exhibit A is no longer anecdotal. It is primary evidence — a real-time documentation of Polly Chromatic’s compliance, clarity, and repeated requests for formal homeschool recognition.

This isn’t a chat.
It’s a procedural timeline, dressed in Messenger blue.

🧾 I. What It Confirms

• Date of initial outreach to Mark Garland: 15 June 2017
• Content: Requests for guidance, contact number provided, calls followed up
• Tone: Respectful, consistent, thorough
• Barriers: No response, missed calls, rescheduled calls, postponed action
• Proof of:

  • Intent to comply

  • Repeated attempts to formalise

  • Institutional avoidance

⚖️ II. Why It Matters

Polly was accused of being “unregistered.”
This file proves she was actively seeking registration — months before the state escalated.

Mark Garland’s pattern of delayed follow-through and non-issuance of official letters forms the very foundation of the maladministration and harassment complaints filed across 2020.

📌 Final Analysis:

Exhibit A shows:

  • She followed the chain of command.

  • She complied without coercion.

  • She was failed by those who promised clarity and delivered confusion.

The system said she didn’t ask properly.
This file says otherwise.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions