“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Written Refusal Ignored. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Written Refusal Ignored. Show all posts

You Went to the Wrong Flat, Ignored the Right Email, and Blamed Me for Breathing.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 13 February 2024

NO, SAMIRA. WE’RE IN A HOTEL. AND YES, I’VE SAID THIS TEN TIMES.

Filed Under: Medical Disregard, Housing Obsession, Written Refusal Ignored, RBKC Incompetence, Disability Rights, Legal and Educational Interference

📎 SUBJECT: Another Email. Another Boundary Breach.

By: Samira Issa
Observed By: Eric Wedge-Bull
Address Searched: Not the one listed
Respect for Disability Law: Missing entirely

“It is not logical to go to our old flat looking for us when I’ve sent you many emails in the past few days… stating that we are staying in a hotel temporarily.”

The fact that this needs to be said is already embarrassing.

Samira claimed to have read the emails. Then proceeded to do the one thing that revealed she hadn’t.

🧠 WHAT YOU COULD HAVE DONE:

  • Open the email

  • Read the part about the hotel

  • Respect the disability communication needs

  • Ask a question via email

Instead, you:

  • Showed up to an empty flat

  • Invented confusion

  • Blamed the mother

  • Wasted everyone's time

🩺 DISABILITY IS NOT A NEGOTIATION:

Noelle has:

  • Severe asthma

  • Panic disorder

  • Muscle tension dysphonia

  • A documented need for written-only communication

And yet—Samira writes as if verbal communication is an optional accessory to "real" safeguarding.

“It is not my fault if you or other humans cannot communicate effectively via written communication.”
💅 Correct.

📚 FOR THE RECORD:

  • Referral contents unclear

  • No incident at Westminster and Chelsea Hospital

  • Multiple false reports from community members

  • Children thriving, homeschooled, safe

  • Valentine’s Day: reserved for love, not harassment

  • Flat move in progress

And yet—social workers act as though motherhood itself is suspicious unless under surveillance.

⚖️ QUOTABLE CLARITY:

“I pride myself on efficiency.”
“You could have simply asked me your questions via email.”
“We are busy.”
“You continue to interrupt our personal, homeschool, and extracurricular activities…”
“Have you thought about how your actions are affecting my children?”

Apparently not. But we’ll remind them in court.

🏛 FUNDAMENTAL BRITISH VALUES, SINCE YOU SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN:

  • Democracy

  • Rule of Law

  • Respect and Tolerance

  • Individual Liberty

You violate all four when you ignore disability law, presume incompetence, and weaponise "concern."

Noelle Meline
Lawful. Literate. Documented. Done.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, legal threat issued, disability law cited, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, RBKC incompetence, safeguarding theatre, NHS collusion, repeat harassment, verbal coercion refusal, written-only enforcement, fundamental values violated

No comments:

Bothering Mothers Is Not a Safeguarding Plan.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU NEED TO GET A GRIP.

Filed Under: Referral Repetition, NHS Collusion, Written Refusal Ignored, Disability Harassment, Legal Threats Incoming, Social Worker Obsession

📎 SUBJECT: Same Referral. Same Response. Different Mood.

Instigated by: Samira Issa
Still Lurking in the CC: Eric Wedge-Bull
Response Delivered: With finality and elegance.

“You need to really get a grip and stop bothering me and my children.”
“Goodbye.”

A five-star farewell.
Concise. Indisputable. Sublime.

🧾 Yet Again, a Quick Recap:

  • The incident: 2 January 2024

  • The hospital: Chelsea & Westminster (again)

  • The referral: Based on known, documented, fully-addressed matters

  • The response: Written. Explicit. Repeated.

  • The conditions: Asthma. Panic disorder. Medically exempt from verbal contact.

And still, Samira writes:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

To whom?
To you, perhaps. Not to the mother.
Certainly not to the law.

📵 YOU WERE ALREADY TOLD:

  • No verbal meetings

  • No new information

  • No legal basis for further inquiry

  • Solicitor already instructed

  • Referral already answered

But here you are — again — staging another episode of unnecessary inquiry dressed in synthetic concern.

🧠 THIS IS NOT PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT.

THIS IS COERCIVE FIXATION.

A social worker's inability to tolerate boundaries does not constitute grounds for escalation.
And "referral fatigue" is not a justification for ignoring medical documentation.

👁️ THE REALITY:

You are no longer safeguarding.
You are surveilling.
You are stalking through policy, hoping to fabricate a case by sheer repetition.
You are abusing process to override refusal.

Noelle Meline
No longer participating in safeguarding theatre.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, referral fatigue, safeguarding fraud, NHS collusion, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, mother refusal, legal boundaries breached, medically silenced, RBKC misconduct, SWANK documentation archive, harassment by policy

No comments:

Documented Obsessions