“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label NHS collusion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NHS collusion. Show all posts

You’re Not Listening—You’re Fishing. Call Your Lawyer.

 πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

I WILL NOT SPEAK. I CANNOT BREATHE. I AM NOT A REFERRAL.

Filed Under: Medical Disregard, Referral Recycling, Legal Threat Ignored, Asthmatic Sovereignty, NHS Collusion, RBKC Timewasting


πŸ“Ž SUBJECT: Referral #6 for the Same Thing (Now with Extra Tone-Deafness)

From: Samira Issa (still pretending this is helpful)
CC: Eric Wedge-Bull (his silence is not neutral)
To: A mother who already answered. In writing. Multiple times.


“I’m sick.
I can’t breathe well.
I will not speak out loud.
Not sure what you can’t understand.”

That line belongs in a courtroom. Or carved into the entrance of every overfunded safeguarding team office.

“Do not ask me to speak when I can’t breathe.”
“Leave us alone.”
“I’m hiring a lawyer. Hire your own.”


🧠 CLARITY FOR THE FILE:

  • This is not a misunderstanding.

  • This is willful provocation.

  • This is institutional stalking by email.

  • This is a disabled woman stating clear, lawful boundaries.

  • And being ignored.


🩺 IN CASE ANYONE NEEDS IT SPELT OUT AGAIN:

  • Severe asthma

  • PTSD

  • Speech-impairing dysphonia

  • NHS negligence under formal review

  • Written-only communication legally mandated

And yet — Samira insists:

“Would you be able to meet in person?”

That’s not a safeguarding inquiry.
That’s deliberate endangerment.


🧾 LEGAL TRANSLATION:

This is no longer an attempt to “support.”
This is pre-litigation bait.
You are building the mother’s case for her — beautifully.


Noelle Meline
Sick, silenced, sovereign. Legally represented. Not interested.
πŸ“© complaints@swankarchive.com


Labels: snobby, written-only demand, medically silenced, safeguarding theatre, legal retaliation, RBKC overreach, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, NHS collusion, harassment escalation, mother under siege

I’m Not a Crisis. I’m a Mother. Now Leave Us Alone.

 πŸ–‹️ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU NEED TO GET A GRIP.


Filed Under: Referral Repetition, Legal Threat Ignored, NHS Collusion, Harassment-as-Procedure, Disabled Mother Stalked, SWANK Documentation


πŸ“Ž SUBJECT: Another Attempt to Manufacture Urgency

Author of Bureaucratic Fiction: Samira Issa
Persistent Co-star: Eric Wedge-Bull
Victim of Systemic Email Harassment: Polly Chromatic

“You need to really get a grip and stop bothering me and my children.”
— Polly, delivering both truth and conclusion.

That is the only sentence in this entire exchange worth remembering.


⚖️ THE CONTEXT YOU REFUSE TO ABSORB:

  • The hospital referral was dated and retaliatory.

  • The “concern” was already addressed.

  • The facts remain static.

  • Medical limitations are documented.

  • The response has not changed.

Yet you wrote:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

To whom, Samira?
To the file? To your compliance quota?
Because it certainly isn’t to the mother who cannot breathe, has refused, and already retained legal counsel.


⛔ THE OFFICIAL POSITION:

  • No phone calls.

  • No in-person meetings.

  • No fabricated urgency.

  • No further participation.


🧠 YOU ARE NOT ACTING ON A REFERRAL.

YOU ARE ACTING ON OBSESSION.

There is no safeguarding action here.
There is no fresh information.
There is no legal footing.

What you are doing is clinging to the echo of a case that never was.


✍️ FROM THE SWANK DESK:

When a mother tells you she has hired a solicitor, cannot speak, and is being medically harmed by your continued contact, and you persist—

That’s no longer contact. That’s litigation bait.


Polly Chromatic
Still not in crisis. Still not available for manufactured concern.
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com


Labels: snobby, serious, RBKC harassment, referral recycling, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, NHS collusion, disability ignored, medically silenced, mother refusal, lawful boundary, legal escalation imminent

Bothering Mothers Is Not a Safeguarding Plan.

 πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU NEED TO GET A GRIP.

Filed Under: Referral Repetition, NHS Collusion, Written Refusal Ignored, Disability Harassment, Legal Threats Incoming, Social Worker Obsession


πŸ“Ž SUBJECT: Same Referral. Same Response. Different Mood.

Instigated by: Samira Issa
Still Lurking in the CC: Eric Wedge-Bull
Response Delivered: With finality and elegance.


“You need to really get a grip and stop bothering me and my children.”
“Goodbye.”

A five-star farewell.
Concise. Indisputable. Sublime.


🧾 Yet Again, a Quick Recap:

  • The incident: 2 January 2024

  • The hospital: Chelsea & Westminster (again)

  • The referral: Based on known, documented, fully-addressed matters

  • The response: Written. Explicit. Repeated.

  • The conditions: Asthma. Panic disorder. Medically exempt from verbal contact.

And still, Samira writes:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

To whom?
To you, perhaps. Not to the mother.
Certainly not to the law.


πŸ“΅ YOU WERE ALREADY TOLD:

  • No verbal meetings

  • No new information

  • No legal basis for further inquiry

  • Solicitor already instructed

  • Referral already answered

But here you are — again — staging another episode of unnecessary inquiry dressed in synthetic concern.


🧠 THIS IS NOT PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT.

THIS IS COERCIVE FIXATION.

A social worker's inability to tolerate boundaries does not constitute grounds for escalation.
And "referral fatigue" is not a justification for ignoring medical documentation.


πŸ‘️ THE REALITY:

You are no longer safeguarding.
You are surveilling.
You are stalking through policy, hoping to fabricate a case by sheer repetition.
You are abusing process to override refusal.


Noelle Meline
No longer participating in safeguarding theatre.
πŸ“© complaints@swankarchive.com


Labels: snobby, serious, referral fatigue, safeguarding fraud, NHS collusion, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, mother refusal, legal boundaries breached, medically silenced, RBKC misconduct, SWANK documentation archive, harassment by policy

You Don’t Need a Conversation. You Need a Court Date.

 πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

I Am Spending Time With My Children. You Are Spending Time Repeating Yourself.

Filed Under: Referral Looping, Asthma Disregard, NHS Collusion, Social Work Harassment, Verbal Coercion, Written Refusal Ignored (Again)


πŸ“Ž SUBJECT: Referral (Still) About the 2 January 2024 Incident

From: Samira Issa
Also CC’d: Eric Wedge-Bull (Apparently Still Reading From the Same Script)
To: A mother who already replied. Firmly. Several times.


“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

You wrote this while claiming to have read all the emails.

So let’s highlight the most elegant reply yet:

“I am spending time with my kids. I do not want to waste my time with you. Call a lawyer.”


🧾 You were told:

  • The incident was already handled.

  • There is no new information.

  • The matter has been escalated to the court.

  • Medical documentation prohibits verbal contact.

  • Harassment litigation is in progress.

Yet you persist — not because of care, but because of habit.


🧠 THIS IS NOT A REFERRAL.

THIS IS A LOOP.

A loop of avoidance — designed to distract a disabled mother from her legal case, her medical care, and her actual children.

You are not checking safety.
You are checking control.


🫁 And again, because it seems printed words don’t register:

I cannot speak on the phone.
I will not attend in person.
I have legal representation.
All communication must be written.
The matter has already been addressed.


🎭 This Is Not Safeguarding.

This Is Bureaucratic Theatre.

And unfortunately for your department, you’re performing in front of a legal audience now.


Noelle Meline
Breathing, Litigating, Unbothered.
πŸ“© complaints@swankarchive.com


Labels: snobby, SWANK tribunal, safeguarding harassment, legal escalation, verbal coercion refusal, RBKC misconduct, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, NHS referral theatre, repeat loop abuse, written-only mandate, sovereign mother under siege

If I Can’t Breathe, I Also Can’t Chat



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024
THE ART OF NOT LISTENING: Social Work as a Performance of Deafness

Filed Under: Disability Discrimination, Verbal Coercion, Retaliatory Safeguarding, Email Theatre, Reasonable Adjustment Violations, Medico-Legal Escalation


Dear Samira Issa,

You have now contacted me three times regarding the same incidentThe same. Let us say it in a larger font for the bureaucrats at the back:

I HAVE ALREADY RESPONDED.

And yet — despite a documented, medically mandated refusal to speak on the phone due to asthmaPTSD, and muscle tension dysphonia, you wrote:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person? A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

Bene-ficial.
To whom, exactly?

Because it is certainly not beneficial to me, a mother with a breathing condition so severe that it has hospitalised me. Nor is it lawful, moral, or in compliance with Equality Act 2010 standards.


Let Us Clarify the Hierarchy of Needs:

  • Breathing > Bureaucracy

  • Safety > Surveillance

  • Written Adjustments > Forced Conversation

You do not get to override disability law to suit your referral performance metrics.

You are not an agent of support. You are an agent of repetition.


This is harassment.
This is a violation.
This is legal evidence.

Your refusal to acknowledge written instructions is no longer merely inappropriate. It is institutional negligence. And worse — it is part of a pattern. The same hospital. The same incident. The same referral. Again. Again. Again.

I do not need help.
I need you to stop pretending not to understand.


So, let me be emphatically, typographically clear:

NO.
I will not speak on the phone.
NO.
I will not come to your office.
NO.
I will not engage with a safeguarding system that is, in practice, a loop of psychological abuse.


I have now retained legal counsel.

Expect a formal action regarding:

  • Medical negligence

  • Disability discrimination

  • Institutional harassment under the guise of “concern”

Until then, refrain from contacting me outside of strictly written, legal correspondence.

If you require clarification, please re-read the above. In fact, re-read this entire dispatch aloud in your office — and then ask yourself why social work has become the front desk of systemic trauma.


Noelle Meline
Voice Withheld for Medical Reasons. But Still Sovereign.
πŸ“© complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, safeguarding fraud, disability rights, statutory breach, legal escalation, verbal coercion refusal, repeat referral abuse, RBKC misconduct, NHS collusion, mother under siege, medically silenced

Documented Obsessions