⟡ SWANK Archive Post ⟡
When They Escalated Instead of Ceasing: The Letter That Reframed the Game
📍 Published by SWANK London Ltd.
📄 Date of Issue: 6 June 2025
I. The Record That Changed Their Tone
They were warned.
On 22 May 2025, SWANK London Ltd. issued a cease and desist. On 24 May, a formal legal demand. By 27 May, all notices had arrived in the post.
And on 29 May — with full knowledge of the record — they escalated.
This letter is what followed.
II. Purpose of the Letter
This formal notice from SWANK London Ltd. assumes institutional jurisdiction over all safeguarding engagement targeting our director and her children. It documents:
- Procedural retaliation following protected disclosures
- Breach of written-only disability adjustments
- Disregard for medical and legal notices served in good faith
- A safeguarding escalation (PLO) issued as retaliation — not in response to need
It is not a request.
It is a jurisdictional reset.
III. To Whom It Was Sent
- Kirsty Hornal – Senior Practitioner
- Samuel Brown – Team Manager
- Sarah Newman – Executive Director
- Legal Services – Westminster City Council
- Complaints Department – Westminster Children’s Services
All recipients were named. All contents are now preserved.
IV. Why This Matters
When a parent refuses unlawful safeguarding contact, social services often escalate — not to protect, but to punish.
This document proves it.
It is now part of the public record, court bundle, and institutional memory of SWANK London Ltd.
⬇ View the Full Letter
[Download PDF – 2025.06.06_SWANK_CourtExhibit_LetterToWCC_RetaliationAfterCeaseNotice.pdf]
Filed under: Retaliation, Disability Discrimination, Judicial Archive
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.