⟡ “We Refused to Cooperate. They Retaliated Anyway.” ⟡
Polly Chromatic Forwards Formal Refusal Letter and Police Report Against Kirsty Hornal to Legal Counsel, After Sending to Westminster and RBKC Officers
Filed: 18 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-09
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-18_SWANK_Email_LauraSavage_RefusalNotice_PoliceReport_Kirsty_CooperationTermination.pdf
Summary: Forwarded email confirming delivery of refusal notice and police report against Kirsty Hornal to Merali Beedle and Blackfords, securing legal service and timeline verification.
I. What Happened
On 18 February 2025, Polly Chromatic (then writing under her legal name) sent a formal email titled:
“Formal Notice of Refusal to Cooperate Due to Failure to Accommodate My Disability, Emotional/Psychological Abuse, and Harm to My Family”
She attached:
A Refusal to Cooperate Letter
A Police Report against Kirsty Hornal
Recipients:
Legal counsel: Laura Savage and Simon O’Meara
CC’d: Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid (NHS), and multiple safeguarding officers at Westminster and RBKC
This confirmed that:
All relevant actors received the refusal and police documentation
Legal service was secure and traceable
PLO retaliation occurred after these notices — confirming retaliatory motive
II. What the Record Establishes
• The refusal to cooperate and police complaint were submitted before safeguarding threats
• All actors — from Sarah Newman to NHS and lawyers — were copied
• Laura Savage was formally briefed for future legal defence
• The file functions as a service record and legal timeline anchor
• It proves that Westminster’s next step (the PLO) came after full awareness of the harm they were causing
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because refusal to cooperate is a legal right, not a trigger for escalation.
Because forwarding it to counsel is the act that turns harm into evidence.
Because this email will appear in court before the PLO letter does.
SWANK logs every refusal the system ignored — and every silence it responded to with force.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that a refusal after abuse is defiance.
We do not accept that legal notice is a loophole for retaliation.
We do not accept that this chain can be denied — because we filed it.
This wasn’t refusal. It was documentation.
And SWANK marked the day cooperation ended — and retaliation began.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.