⟡ They Escalated the Case — So She Escalated the Evidence. ⟡
When silence becomes strategy, the only reply is a police report — in writing, cc’d, and archived.
Filed: 16 April 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-04
📎 Download PDF – 2025-04-16_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_MetPoliceReport_SubmissionNotice.pdf
A formal notification to institutional recipients confirming the submission of a police report against social worker Kirsty Hornal for misconduct, harassment, and retaliatory safeguarding.
I. What Happened
The social worker escalated.
The mother responded — not with fear, but with facts.
This email notifies Westminster Council, NHS Trust staff, and safeguarding leadership that a police report has been filed regarding Kirsty Hornal’s pattern of disability discrimination, abuse of process, and harassment.
The tone is composed.
The timing is devastating.
II. What the Email Establishes
That a police report was submitted and distributed across key agencies
That the grounds were legally and procedurally outlined
That the mother was documenting every stage of retaliatory safeguarding
That further contact after this point would be considered institutional misconduct under active complaint
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because you cannot claim surprise when the police were informed — in writing, in advance.
Because archiving is not defiance. It’s legal survival.
And because when institutions are complicit, public notice is the only remaining safeguard.
IV. Violations Identified
Harassment by Social Worker in Active Disability Context
Abuse of Safeguarding for Retaliatory Escalation
Procedural Misconduct under Public Authority
Refusal to Acknowledge Medical and Legal Protections
Coordinated Pressure After Evidence Publication
V. SWANK’s Position
This wasn’t a complaint. It was a warning shot.
The recipient list was not incidental — it was strategic.
The institutions copied had the opportunity to act.
They didn’t.
Now, their silence is on record too.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.