“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Disability Rights Enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disability Rights Enforcement. Show all posts

Response to Complaint Ref: 15083377 – Reaffirmation of Facts, Formality, and the Request for Procedural Competence


🦚 Response to Complaint Ref: 15083377 – Reaffirmation of Facts, Formality, and the Request for Procedural Competence

Filed under the documentation of evidence reaffirmation, cross-borough evasion, and the constitutional demand for administrative literacy.

12 March 2025
To:
Customer Relationship Team
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC)
Subject: Response to Complaint Ref: 15083377 – Reaffirmation of Facts, Formality, and the Request for Procedural Competence

🧾 Dear Customer Relationship Team,

Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding Complaint Ref: 15083377 —
though I must observe, with due politeness, that the content is both puzzling and disheartening.

I am compelled, yet again, to clarify what ought to be a matter of basic internal record:

RBKC social workers have, demonstrably and indisputably, been involved in my case.

This is not supposition.
It is documented reality —
substantiated through correspondence, assessments, and direct professional contact originating from your department.

Accordingly:

I expect any further attempts at strategic denial to cease,
and for this matter to be reviewed with the seriousness the contradiction demands.

📜 Cross-Borough Courtesy (But Not a Deflection)

While I have extended the courtesy of informing Westminster social care services of related concerns,
this in no way diminishes — nor displaces — RBKC’s own responsibilities.

The complaint pertains to the actions and omissions of RBKC personnel,
and must be investigated by RBKC with due rigour and impartiality.

📚 Submission of Evidence: A Logistical Request

As previously noted, I am in possession of extensive documentation, including:

  • Emails;

  • Official assessments;

  • Written communications with RBKC social workers.

To facilitate the appropriate review, kindly confirm:

  • The correct email address or portal for submission;

  • Any specific format or naming conventions required for internal processing.

Efficiency, once requested politely, must now be solicited firmly.

🩻 Disability Accommodations & Record Access – Ongoing Concerns

Parallel to the primary complaint, I remind RBKC of its obligations regarding:

  • Implementation of reasonable adjustments, in line with the Equality Act 2010;

  • Full access to all personal records, without fragmentation, deferral, or strategic redirection.

I expect written confirmation that these matters:

  • Are being actioned appropriately;

  • Will be reflected in all future correspondence and procedural handling.

📜 Next Steps – Kindly Clarify Timeline and Receipt

I request:

  • Written confirmation of receipt of this correspondence;

  • Clear instructions for submission of supporting evidence;

  • A formal outline of the expected timeline for the substantive review of this complaint.

Given the prior confusion, contradiction, and procedural contortion,

I trust you will appreciate my insistence on precision, transparency, and exhaustive documentation going forward.

📜 Yours,

With due constitutional formality and procedural vigilance,
Polly



No comments:

Documented Obsessions