⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Maladministration in the Age of Apology Forms
In re Chromatic v. Parliamentary Health Ombudsman, On the Baroque Futility of Complaint Portals and Procedural Evasion
📎 Metadata
Filed: 7 July 2025
Reference Code: SWL-EX-0624-PHSO-COMPLAINT
Court File Name: 2025-06-24_SWANK_Complaint_PHSO_DisabilityDiscrimination_ProceduralRetaliation
1-line summary: Formal complaint to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman detailing systemic disability discrimination and retaliatory safeguarding obstruction.
I. What Happened
On 24 June 2025, Polly Chromatic submitted a formal complaint to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) regarding:
Disability discrimination
Medical sabotage
Institutional retaliation
Procedural denial of access to justice
The automated response offered forms, links, disclaimers, and waiting periods — the bureaucratic palliative for institutional collapse.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That the PHSO is aware of ongoing safeguarding retaliation tied to formal disability disclosures
That jurisdictional exclusions and ICO procedural breaches have been recorded as maladministration
That the U.S. citizenship of the children and their mother was ignored at critical points of intervention
That Westminster and NHS entities operated in defiance of oversight, yet with administrative protection
The PHSO is not a tribunal. It is a vault of polite delay.
But now it is on record.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because even an automated reply is a timestamped admission that a complaint has been raised.
Because once a body is aware of injustice — and does nothing — it becomes part of the harm.
SWANK does not log for remedy. It logs for history.
For audit. For public record. For the archive that will be read after the harm is complete and the silence no longer fashionable.
IV. Violations and Oversight Failures
Failure to acknowledge or intervene in retaliatory safeguarding actions
Disability discrimination via sustained disregard of medical documentation
Tolerance of jurisdictional evasion and child protection overreach
Operating complaint portals that do not respond to urgency, only structure
In short: the PHSO offered a template where a tribunal was required.
V. SWANK’s Position
This submission will not be buried. It will be read aloud in court, should it come to that.
Because when oversight bodies are complicit in silence, the record must grow louder than them.
SWANK London Ltd has submitted the complaint.
Now it awaits the silence — and logs that, too.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.