“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Documented Obsessions

Showing posts with label audit trail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label audit trail. Show all posts

Re: Hornal & Brown (Procedural Termination of Correspondence, Filed Under Reluctant Clarity)


⟡ We No Longer Speak to Kirsty or Sam ⟡
A procedural silence is now in effect. Communication has been archived, not continued.

Filed: 27 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/INSTITUTION/0627-02
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-27_SWANK_CorrespondenceTermination_HornalBrown.pdf
1-line summary: SWANK London Ltd declares formal termination of all direct contact with social workers Kirsty Hornal and Sam Brown due to procedural escalation and institutional misconduct.

I. What Happened

For over a year, the Applicant was subject to persistent, unfiltered, and often hostile communication from Kirsty Hornal and Sam Brown of Westminster Children’s Services. Emails were issued without legal authority, bypassed formal disability adjustments, and frequently ignored requests for written-only correspondence. These individuals escalated emotional harm while evading scrutiny.

Despite repeated formal complaints, audit notifications, criminal referral submissions, and documentation efforts, both employees continued to position themselves as gatekeepers of contact and narrative control.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • Repeated breach of jurisdictional clarity

  • Use of correspondence to provoke, pressure, or confuse

  • Failure to adhere to written-only accommodations

  • Procedural overreach in direct communication post-filing

  • Bypassing formal legal and consular channels once active

III. Why SWANK Logged It

This is no longer a conversation.
It is an archive.

Having engaged, rebutted, recorded, filed, and publicly posted over 500 communications, SWANK London Ltd now formally closes the channel to these individuals.
The audit has shifted. The venue is now judicial.
This is not a courtesy — it is a legal repositioning.
They are no longer entitled to answers, access, or reaction.
Their names remain — but only in evidence.

IV. Violations

  • Children Act 1989 – failure to act in the child’s best interests

  • Equality Act 2010, Sections 20–21 – failure to accommodate written communication

  • Article 6 ECHR – ongoing interference in fair and accessible legal process

  • Common law duty of procedural fairness

V. SWANK’s Position

Kirsty Hornal and Sam Brown are no longer direct recipients of communication.
They will not be copied, warned, or addressed.
They are archived.

All future material will be routed through the Family Court, Westminster Legal Services, and/or regulatory bodies. Their behaviour remains under formal audit, their misconduct bundled, and their relevance entirely circumstantial.

The era of direct address is over. We now file. We do not reply.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments: