⟡ “You’re All Making Me Sick.” ⟡
A medical escalation. A legal refusal. A respiratory warning ignored.
Filed: 14 December 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/FAILURE-RESPIRATORY-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025.02.14_DisabilityHealthBreakdown_WestminsterSafeguardingReid.pdf
A written complaint to Westminster officials detailing the physical collapse, legal breaches, and fatal risk caused by safeguarding intrusion and institutional neglect.
I. What Happened
On 14 December 2024, Polly Chromatic issued a formal health escalation and safeguarding refusal to senior Westminster staff and NHS clinicians. The message detailed weeks of respiratory distress, widespread illness across the household, and the psychological and physiological toll of prolonged unwanted state contact. The letter identified safeguarding personnel — not asthma — as the primary source of ongoing health deterioration.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Contact from Children’s Services was physically harmful and medically unsound
Disability-related accommodations were knowingly ignored
Repeated requests for non-contact were refused in practice
Emotional exhaustion was compounded by institutional gaslighting
A clear risk to life was present, logged, and left unaddressed
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because safeguarding is not exempt from accountability.
Because illness caused by forced contact is not “coincidence.”
Because refusal is a legal and medical protection — not a provocation.
And because when a disabled parent becomes physically sicker because of social work “support,”
that is not an unfortunate outcome — it is misconduct.
SWANK London Ltd. logged this document as part of its disability archive, evidentiary timeline, and formal institutional harm record.
IV. Violations
❍ Equality Act 2010 – Refusal to provide adjustments for a known chronic respiratory illness
❍ Article 3 ECHR – Inhuman and degrading treatment through reckless disregard for health impact
❍ Negligent Endangerment – Escalating illness by refusing to accommodate legal and medical refusal
❍ Safeguarding Misconduct – Misuse of authority to override disability protections
❍ Failure of Duty of Care – Continuing contact after explicit warnings of harm and exhaustion
V. SWANK’s Position
This was not a safeguarding intervention.
This was government-administered medical destabilisation.
The refusal was lawful.
The condition was documented.
The warnings were issued.
And the silence that followed was violence by omission.
SWANK London Ltd. stands by the archive.
The collapse wasn’t clinical.
It was institutional.
And it was entirely preventable.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.