“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label St Thomas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label St Thomas. Show all posts

In re: The Threshold of Idiocy – A Catalogue of False Authority, Performed Concern, and Archival Humiliation



🏆 THE STUPIDITY TRIUMVIRATE: SWANK’s Award for Procedural Genius in the Field of Harm

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive

Filed: 9 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-PRIZE-0711-TRIO-STUPID
Filename: 2025-07-09_SWANK_StupidityAward_RBKC_WCC_StThomas.pdf
Summary: Celebrating the bureaucratic brilliance of three institutions that managed to escalate, retaliate, and destroy — all without fact-checking a single breath.


🥇 GRAND PRIZE

St Thomas’ Hospital (Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust)

For the breathtaking interpretation of 44% oxygen saturation as “intoxication.”
Their clinical acumen triggered an entire safeguarding case based on… a respiratory emergency.

Filed mistake:

  • A life-threatening asthma event

    What they saw:

  • A drunk mother

    What they failed to do:

  • Review basic vitals, consult respiratory history, or retrieve CCTV

SWANK Verdict:

"Medically negligent, procedurally arrogant, and now court-exposed."


🥈 RUNNER-UP

RBKC Children’s Services

For adopting the false hospital narrative with zero due diligence, and swiftly escalating to child protection… because the mother had “impaired speech” following sewer gas poisoning.

What they didn’t do:

  • Provide a Section 17 assessment

  • Verify hazard reports

  • Acknowledge disability disclosures

SWANK Verdict:

 “They saw a vulnerable family and imagined risk — then made it real through interference.”


🥉 HONOURABLE MENTION

Westminster Children’s Services

For the coordinated retaliation after legal filings — plus an inspired finale: filing an EPO three days after a criminal referral and civil audit letter was received.

Most Outstanding Achievement:

  • Sudden inbox responsiveness the week before court

  • Pretending years of silence didn’t happen

SWANK Verdict:

“Performance art disguised as safeguarding.”


IV. Why This Matters

These three institutions have:

  • Built a case on a lie

  • Retaliated against lawful claimants

  • Ruined continuity of care for medically vulnerable children

  • And now face litigation across four jurisdictions

Let this be a cautionary tale for public bodies attempting to safeguard without scrutiny:
Stupidity is no longer protected by your letterhead.


⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.