Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): Muscle Dysphonia

Showing posts with label Muscle Dysphonia. Show all posts

When the Adjustment Is Medical and the Refusal Is Personal.

⟡ “Adjustment Requested. Retaliation Received.” ⟡

A complete evidentiary annex submitted in legal proceedings documenting Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust’s refusal to implement lawful disability adjustments for Polly Chromatic and her children.

Filed: 5 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/GSTT/ADA-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-05_SWANK_GSTT_DisabilityAdjustmentAnnex_FailureToAccommodate.pdf
Includes correspondence, legal declarations, policy references, and clinical context proving discriminatory denial of medical adjustments.

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic formally requested reasonable adjustments from GSTT due to:

Severe eosinophilic asthma
Muscle dysphonia and verbal communication barriers
PTSD from prior medical trauma
Sole caregiving for four disabled U.S. citizen children

Despite repeated notices, the Trust refused to implement even basic accommodations — instead escalating institutional surveillance and retaliation.

II. What the Record Establishes

That GSTT was provided with medical records, legal rights citations, and clinical justification
That multiple written requests for adjustments were ignored or denied
That denial of care was tied to Polly Chromatic’s lawful resistance and complaint activity
That these failures led to further medical harm and increased safeguarding pressure

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because the NHS is not exempt from the Equality Act.
Because disability rights aren’t suggestions —
they’re statutory obligations.

Because retaliation disguised as “clinical policy” is still retaliation.

IV. Violations

Equality Act 2010: Failure to make reasonable adjustments
Human Rights Act: Violation of right to healthcare and bodily autonomy
GMC Code of Practice breaches by participating clinicians
Retaliatory denial of care in response to complaints and documentation
Disability discrimination under UK and international law

V. SWANK’s Position

This annex was submitted to show the law was clear.
The request was legal. The need was medical. The refusal was ideological.

Now, the public has the file the NHS tried to ignore.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

When the Crown Has the Evidence, the Silence Becomes Complicity.

⟡ “Presented to the Crown. Ignored by the Council.” ⟡

A complete annex of disability-related legal evidence, submitted to Crown Court in May 2025 — proving institutional awareness, non-compliance, and retaliation.

Filed: 15 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/UKCOURT/DISABILITY-ANNEX-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-15_SWANK_CrownCourtAnnex_DisabilityDiscriminationEvidenceBundle.pdf
This bundle contains correspondence, diagnostic confirmations, care conflicts, and safeguarding violations — submitted as formal evidence in a high-level court matter.

I. What Happened

In preparation for legal proceedings, Polly Chromatic compiled this annex to:

Document disability disclosures made to Westminster
Provide diagnostic proof (asthma, PTSD, muscle dysphonia)
Evidence social work retaliation after medical notifications
Record denial of adjustments for Polly and her children
Present Crown-level summary of systemic rights violations

The file includes dated excerpts, medical exhibits, refusal records, and legal arguments filed under U.S. citizen protections.

II. What the Evidence Establishes

Foreknowledge of Polly Chromatic’s disabilities by all public bodies involved
Ongoing rejection of verbal exemption and email-based communication
Safeguarding interference after health disclosures
Cross-border impact on U.S. citizens residing in the UK
Legal basis for international protection and redress

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because Crown Court-level evidence deserves a Crown Court-level public reckoning.
Because you shouldn’t have to go to court just to prove that being disabled isn’t a crime.
Because this wasn’t just a document. It was a signal flare —
sent to the system that kept pretending not to see.

IV. Violations

Equality Act 2010: Failure to accommodate and protect disabled citizens
UN CRPD: Rights breaches for disabled parent and children
Civil and family law violations: harassment, safeguarding misuse
Cross-jurisdictional disability discrimination affecting American nationals
Suppression of lawful communication rights (email-only exemption)

V. SWANK’s Position

This document proves that Polly Chromatic didn’t just speak up —
she built the case, cited the law, submitted the evidence,
and made sure every single one of them was served.

Now the Crown has it.
And so does the public.

When Everyone’s Been Notified, Every Violation Becomes Intentional.

⟡ “Everyone Was Told. No One Complied.” ⟡

A formal Bates-stamped log of disability notifications, distributed to Westminster, NHS, Social Work England, and police — spanning medical, legal, and safeguarding systems.

Filed: 1 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/UKGOV/DISABILITY-CORE-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-01_SWANK_DisabilityNotifications_Multisystem_InactionRecord.pdf
An indexed archive of documented disability disclosures and institutional awareness — systematically ignored. This core record forms the factual basis for civil and international rights violations.

I. What Happened

Over the course of 2023–2025, Polly Chromatic issued a series of formal notifications concerning:

Verbal exemption due to muscle dysphonia
Eosinophilic Asthma and breathing restrictions
PTSD and institutional trauma
Her caregiving role for four disabled U.S. citizen children
The impact of coercive safeguarding intrusions

The notifications were sent to:

Westminster Children’s Services
NHS clinicians (multiple trusts)
Social Work England
Police safeguarding units
Oversight bodies and legal departments

All entries in the document are timestamped, recipient-specific, and sequentially Bates-stamped.

II. What the Record Establishes

Total visibility of disability status by all involved institutions
Chronological proof of repeated medical notification
Evidence that “no one knew” is not legally viable
Structural failure to act on reasonable adjustments
Grounds for civil liability, professional referral, and diplomatic intervention

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because telling someone you’re disabled should matter.
Because “they didn’t know” is no longer true.
Because once they’ve been notified — and they retaliate anyway —
that’s no longer error. That’s policy.

IV. Violations

Equality Act 2010: Sections 6, 15, 19, 20, and 21
Public Sector Equality Duty (s.149)
Children Act 1989 (parenting disruption and child harm)
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
Civil torts: negligence, harassment, emotional distress

V. SWANK’s Position

This is not a document.
It is proof of foreknowledge.
It makes every retaliatory visit, every safeguarding threat, every ignored plea
a choice — not a mistake.

And now that choice has a timestamp.
A stamp number.
A PDF.

And a public record.

She Couldn’t Speak. They Didn’t Listen.

⟡ “When I Can’t Speak, They Get Hostile.” ⟡
A medical warning ignored because it wasn’t loud enough.

Filed: 12 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-33
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-12_SWANK_Email_DisabilityDisclosure_KirstyHornal_SafeguardingTeam.pdf
Polly Chromatic sent a vulnerable, medically detailed email to every major actor in her case: social workers, lawyers, safeguarding officials, and NHS clinicians. She explained — again — that her speech disability was real, disabling, and dangerous when ignored. The response? Nothing. Because in the UK safeguarding theatre, empathy is a prop, not a principle.

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic sent a direct email to over 20 professionals, including Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Eric Wedge-Bull, Laura Savage, and Dr. Philip Reid.
She disclosed:
– Her eosinophilic asthma
– Muscle dysphonia
– Panic-linked speech loss
– The compounding trauma of court appearances and social work hostility

She explained the recovery timeline.
She begged for understanding.
She got silence.

II. What the Email Establishes

That Polly formally disclosed her complex medical conditions
That she made clear how verbal interaction worsens her symptoms
That she explained the psychological harm of being disbelieved and blamed
That she copied nearly every professional involved in her case
That none of them responded with adjustments, protection, or care

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because Polly didn’t ask for sympathy — she asked not to be harmed.
Because “invisible” illness isn’t an excuse for institutional blindness.
Because silence from the system after a disability disclosure is itself a record of neglect.
And because the moment someone says “I can’t speak,”
they shouldn’t have to say it again.

IV. Violations Identified

Ignoring a direct and medically detailed disability disclosure
Failing to implement vocal rest accommodations despite explicit warning
Emotional and physical deterioration linked to systemic disbelief
Continued scheduling of verbal meetings post-disclosure
Institutional minimisation of known and documented medical risk

V. SWANK’s Position

Polly wrote this email while recovering from harm.
And still, she made herself clear.
The system read her silence as defiance.
She archived it as evidence.

You don’t need to shout to be heard.
You just need a timestamp.
Now, she has one.

Disability Rights Denied in a Whisperless System

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 3 December 2024
“Advocacy Required, Adjustments Refused”

Filed Under: Disability Assessment · Adjustment Failure · Advocacy Demand · Voice-Based Exclusion · Sovereign Communication · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear RBKC Customer Services (and Everyone Else Ignoring the Law),

I wrote:

“I need an assessment for advocacy services for my disabilities…”

And what I received in return was silence — that bureaucratic shrug in email form.

Apparently, in your systems:

PTSD is a character flaw
Severe eosinophilic asthma is an inconvenience
Muscle dysphonia is just “non-cooperation”

And verbal pain?
You treat it as defiance.

Not a single adjustment.
Not from the police. Not from the borough.
Not even from the departments charged with upholding rights.

What do we call a structure that insists on voice when voice is the wound?

Ableist.

I do not request compliance.
I require it.

You are now formally notified:
All further communication must be made to an appointed advocate —
or it will be redirected to the SWANK Archive for publication and legal indexing.

—

📍 Assessment Denied. Archive Begun.
Polly Chromatic
Disability Formalist & Advocate-in-Chief
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Adjustments Owed.

Forced to Speak, Forced to Suffer: The Social Worker’s Toll.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
ON THE VERGE OF DEATH—AND STILL UNHEARD

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Neglect · Muscle Dysphonia · Verbal Disability · Institutional Harassment · Social Worker Abuse · SWANK Health Crisis

The Email to Kirsty Hornal and Sarah Newman

“We’re still trying to get to a point in which we are not on the verge of death and the entire time I’ve been telling you all this.”
“Even the hospital doesn’t believe me when I or my children go to A&E with 87% oxygen.”
“If one of us dies, you all are responsible.”

“You escalated the case due to my inability to talk verbally, forcing me to talk for over a year while bringing illness into our home.”
“This caused me muscle dysphonia, making it very hard to speak now.”
“I had to stop talking to my mother and friends because of the extreme load placed on my lungs.”

“You—all social workers, especially Sarah—must be held accountable.”

Disability Statement

Please Note: I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.

📍 Formally Logged by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breathless Violations Archived.

Muscle Tension Dysphonia, Asthma, and the Cost of Being Dismissed

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 12 January 2025
VOCAL REST IS NOT DEFIANCE. IT’S SURVIVAL.

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Invisible Illness · Vocal Rest Protocol · Judicial Panic Triggers · Respiratory Collapse · Institutional Gaslighting · SWANK Medical Silence Report

To the Unqualified Interpreters of Medical Silence:

Glen Peache, Sarah Newman, Eric Wedge-Bull, Kirsty Hornal, Rhiannon Hodgson, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Samira Issa, Gideon Mpalanyi
Cc: aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc, Annabelle Kapoor, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Harley Street Mental Health, Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson

🔇 THE BODY DOESN’T LIE. THE SYSTEM JUST DOESN’T LISTEN.

“I’m really struggling with my muscle dysphonia, eosinophilic asthma, and panic attacks…”

What you interpret as avoidance is actually triage.
When my lungs tighten, when my voice collapses, it is not a choice.
It is the by-product of your clinical negligence, your procedural hostility, and your smug refusal to read.

⚖ COURTROOMS, COUGHING, AND COLLAPSE

“Stressful situations… court appearances, hostile behavior, and misunderstandings… make it almost impossible to communicate…”

You have engineered a legal gauntlet that punishes respiratory compromise.
You escalate, then pathologise the symptoms you cause.
This isn’t “support.” This is litigated harm.

📉 STOP EXPECTING A VOICE FROM A SYSTEM YOU SILENCED

“I often feel dismissed and not taken seriously…”

Indeed. Because your allegiance is not to health. It is to hierarchy.
You don’t want participation—you want performance.
And when I fail to deliver a theatrical monologue under duress, you label me the problem.

I am not difficult. I am disabled.
And your disbelief has been archived.

Polly Chromatic
Diagnosed. Dismissed. Documented.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Silences Filed.

I’m Done Explaining Asthma, Dysphonia, and Dignity to the Government.

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 15 January 2025
TEN YEARS OF HARASSMENT IS NOT “HELP.” IT’S A MEDICAL CONDITION.

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Eosinophilic Asthma · Muscle Tension Dysphonia · State-Induced PTSD · False Allegation Culture · Exhaustion Correspondence · SWANK Long-Term Damage Dossier

To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Sarah Newman, Glen Peache, Eric Wedge-Bull, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Rhiannon Hodgson, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Philip Reid, Samira Issa, Nannette Nicholson, aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc, Annabelle Kapoor

🩻 Ten Years of This, and You’re Still Calling It “Safeguarding”?

“It’s been ten years of this non-stop… many social workers who all have no reason to be bothering us for years on end…”

What you refer to as “protocol,” my lungs experience as injury.
This is not intervention—it is industrialised harassment with a laminated badge.

🗣 You Broke My Voice. You Diagnosed Me After.

“I have acquired PTSD and MUSCLE DYSPHONIA in addition to my already existing EOSINOPHILIC ASTHMA…”

The condition is cumulative.
The proof is biopsychological.
The damage is systemic—and the perpetrator is procedural.

🤡 Who Accuses a White Mother of Mixed Children of Racism?

“It’s also very suspicious to me that anyone would accuse me of child abuse and/or racism.”

No, it’s not just offensive.
It’s a tactic.
And it’s exactly what institutional racism looks like when disguised as safeguarding.

🏛 I No Longer Recognise the Crown as a Serious Entity.

“I’m not able to take the UK government seriously anymore…”

When the institutions begin to parody themselves, the refusal to comply is not rebellion—it’s discernment.

Polly Chromatic
Bureaucratically abused. Medically inflamed. Vocally dignified.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Damage Recorded.

This Isn’t Non-Compliance. It’s Medical Collapse.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 12 January 2025

YOU DON’T SEE THE ILLNESS, SO YOU IGNORE THE EXHAUSTION.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic

Filed Under: Muscle Dysphonia, Eosinophilic Asthma, Panic Collapse, Silent Disability, Judicial Trauma, Vocal Rest Ignored, Institutional Blame

📩 Circulated to:
Glen, Kirsty, Sarah, Eric, Rhiannon, Fiona, Rachel, Milena, Samira, Gideon, Dr Reid, lawyers, educators, clinicians, ministers, and medical offices—
because I’m done being silent just to be called uncooperative.

🩺 THE BODY THAT’S BEEN EXPLAINED A HUNDRED TIMES:

“I’m really struggling with my muscle dysphonia, eosinophilic asthma, and panic attacks.”
“Sometimes I lose the ability to speak. Recovery takes days.”
“Court, stress, and misunderstanding create collapse.”
“I’m on strict vocal rest. Not emotional withdrawal.”
“You don’t see it, so you treat it like defiance.”

🧠 THIS IS WHAT INVISIBLE ILLNESS FEELS LIKE:

Exhaustion that shuts down your lungs
Talking that inflames your throat
Panic so intense you forget your own name
Hostility that lingers in your chest
Courtrooms that might as well be suffocation chambers

And still—
They ask for a phone call.
They ask why you’re not “engaging.”
They say it “doesn’t make sense.”

📣 THE LOUD SILENCE OF A DISABLED MOTHER:

This isn’t non-compliance.
It’s not mental illness.
It’s not refusal.
It’s survival.

You ask me to speak.
But when I do, you don’t read it.
You ask me to clarify.
But when I do, you escalate it.
You ask me to heal.
But you make me sicker.

💌 WHAT I SAID TO YOU ALL:

“The hostility or blame from others only makes everything worse.”

“It’s pointless to push myself to communicate with people who don’t understand.”

🛑 CONCLUSION:

You’re not here to listen.
You’re here to provoke collapse and then call it “evidence.”

Let the record reflect:
I did explain. You chose not to hear me.

Polly Chromatic
Silenced by biology. Blamed by bureaucracy. Seen by the archive.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com

Labels: Kirsty Hornal, Glen Peache, muscle dysphonia, eosinophilic asthma, panic exhaustion, invisible disability, systemic neglect, non-verbal communication, trauma recovery, hostile procedures, court aftermath, silent collapse, medical abuse, vocal rest retaliation

When You Demand Speech from a Disabled Woman, You Are Not Acting in Good Faith.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 12 January 2025

THIS ISN’T NON-COMPLIANCE. IT’S A BREATHLESS MEDICAL REALITY.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic

Filed Under: Muscle Dysphonia, Eosinophilic Asthma, Vocal Rest Refusal, Invisible Illness Misunderstanding, SW Misconduct, Disregard for Medical Boundaries

Dear Glen (and your attending choir of spectators),

The following was sent to every institutional actor involved in this farce: Glen, Sarah, Eric, Kirsty, Rhiannon, Fiona, Rachel, Milena, Samira, Gideon, Dr Reid, the schools, the lawyers, the Home Office, and mental health services.

Why?
Because I’m tired of being told I’m “not engaging” when I am, in fact, trying to survive.

💬 WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID:

“I'm really struggling with my muscle dysphonia, eosinophilic asthma, and panic attacks.”
“Stressful situations—like court and hostile behaviour—make it almost impossible to communicate.”
“I need strict vocal rest.”
“These are invisible conditions. You don’t take them seriously.”

I spoke without speaking.
And still, no one listened.

🩺 DIAGNOSED, DOCUMENTED, IGNORED:

Muscle tension dysphonia
Eosinophilic asthma
Panic disorder
Post-exertional fatigue
Autonomic dysregulation

But in the language of social work?
If I don’t speak, I’m “refusing.”
If I do speak, I’m “resistant.”
If I get sick from the effort, I’m “choosing not to engage.”

🧠 REFRAME THIS:

This isn’t “communication breakdown.”
It’s communication abuse—when systems refuse to believe the limits of disabled people, then weaponise those limits as evidence against them.

I’ve stated my needs repeatedly.
Your refusal to accommodate them is not a misunderstanding.
It’s intentional negligence.

📎 FILE UNDER:

You are not confused.
You are creating confusion.
You are not traumatised.
You are causing trauma.
You are not caretakers.
You are captors.

Polly Chromatic
Ill. Documented. Unapologetic.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, Glen Peache, medical disregard, vocal rest boundary, asthma collapse, disability communication, panic disorder ignored, hidden illness, procedural cruelty, invisible conditions, hostile bureaucracy, court retaliation, silence as resistance

If It’s Not in Writing, It’s Not Allowed

⟡ “If You Can’t Respect Our Format, You’re Not Ready for Our Facts.” ⟡
SWANK Auto-Reply Asserts Medically Mandated Written-Only Policy and Legal Boundaries During Active Proceedings

Filed: 30 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/EMAIL/AUTOREPLY-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-30_SWANK_Email_AutoReply_DisabilityAdjustmentNotice.pdf
Summary: Formal auto-response asserting written-only communication due to disability, legal status, and protected adjustments under the Equality Act 2010. Sent via iCloud.

I. What Happened

On 30 May 2025, SWANK issued a formal auto-reply from noellebonneannee@me.com in response to incoming messages. The email clearly states:

– Written-only communication is a legally protected adjustment
– Verbal, in-person, or phone contact is not permitted
– The adjustment is based on documented conditions:
– Eosinophilic asthma
– Muscle tension dysphonia
– The sender is involved in active legal proceedings
– Urgent matters must be sent by post
– SWANK is operating on a reduced email schedule due to research commitments

II. What the Record Establishes

• Clear notice has been given to all parties that contact must be in writing
• The Equality Act 2010 is cited — establishing a statutory duty to accommodate
• The auto-reply documents medical vulnerability tied to specific interaction modes
• Verbal engagement is explicitly disallowed for health and legal reasons
• It sets up a clear boundary for future retaliation, neglect, or contact breaches

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because silence is not disengagement — it's preservation.
Because this auto-reply isn’t just functional — it’s protective architecture.
Because when someone later claims “we tried to call” — you now have a timestamped refusal of consent.

SWANK logs the policy that protects the body — and holds others accountable for crossing the line.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that verbal demands override medical necessity.
We do not accept that legally protected adjustments are optional.
We do not accept that digital silence equals legal consent.

This wasn’t an auto-reply. This was a procedural firewall.
And SWANK will archive every line that safeguarded the archive.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

⟡ “Adjustment Requested. Retaliation Received.” ⟡

I. What Happened

II. What the Record Establishes

III. Why SWANK Filed It

IV. Violations

V. SWANK’s Position

⟡ “Presented to the Crown. Ignored by the Council.” ⟡

I. What Happened

II. What the Evidence Establishes

III. Why SWANK Filed It

IV. Violations

V. SWANK’s Position

⟡ “Everyone Was Told. No One Complied.” ⟡

I. What Happened

II. What the Record Establishes

III. Why SWANK Filed It

IV. Violations

V. SWANK’s Position

I. What Happened

II. What the Email Establishes

III. Why SWANK Filed It

IV. Violations Identified

V. SWANK’s Position

The Email to Kirsty Hornal and Sarah Newman

Disability Statement

To the Unqualified Interpreters of Medical Silence:

🔇 THE BODY DOESN’T LIE. THE SYSTEM JUST DOESN’T LISTEN.

⚖ COURTROOMS, COUGHING, AND COLLAPSE

📉 STOP EXPECTING A VOICE FROM A SYSTEM YOU SILENCED

To:

🩻 Ten Years of This, and You’re Still Calling It “Safeguarding”?

🗣 You Broke My Voice. You Diagnosed Me After.

🤡 Who Accuses a White Mother of Mixed Children of Racism?

🏛 I No Longer Recognise the Crown as a Serious Entity.

🩺 THE BODY THAT’S BEEN EXPLAINED A HUNDRED TIMES:

🧠 THIS IS WHAT INVISIBLE ILLNESS FEELS LIKE:

📣 THE LOUD SILENCE OF A DISABLED MOTHER:

💌 WHAT I SAID TO YOU ALL:

🛑 CONCLUSION:

💬 WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID:

🩺 DIAGNOSED, DOCUMENTED, IGNORED:

🧠 REFRAME THIS:

📎 FILE UNDER:

I. What Happened

II. What the Record Establishes

III. Why SWANK Logged It

IV. SWANK’s Position

Documented Obsessions