⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Commentary
Lesson Plans Behind Lockdown: How to Homeschool When the State Imprisons Your Children
In re Chromatic v. The Unenlightened System, Regarding Educational Continuity Amid State-Imposed Separation
I. THE SCANDAL OF CONTINUITY
Despite being forcibly separated from her children without lawful threshold or medical consideration, Polly Chromatic has continued to:
Conduct educational contact sessions (flashcard learning, thematic engagement)
Maintain structure, tone, and intellectual nurturing through video calls
Prepare a curriculum in exile, tailored to each child’s development and needs
This is not just defiance.
It’s parenting at a level the system can’t replicate.
II. THE EDUCATIONAL VIOLENCE OF STATE INTERRUPTION
The Local Authority:
Cancelled known specialist appointments
Attempted to enroll medically vulnerable children into a public school system they previously exempted from
Blocked exercise, health routines, and mental health support
Denied their primary educator any direct access to deliver materials or monitor progress
The state claims to protect.
But it can’t spell phonics without flipping the handbook.
III. TEACHING FROM A DISTANCE, LOVING WITHOUT PERMISSION
Flashcards through a screen.
Encouragement between surveillance.
A mother correcting grammar under the cold eye of social workers who’ve never read the curriculum.
This is homeschooling under constraint.
And it still surpasses the state’s best efforts.
IV. SWANK’s Position
When a government separates a family and then fails to provide equivalent educational care, it has:
Violated the child’s right to stable learning
Undermined the integrity of the parent-child bond
Revealed its ignorance masked as concern
We do not ask for their support.
We teach despite their presence.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.