“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Email Disclosure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Email Disclosure. Show all posts

The Trauma Was in the Visits — And They Knew It Before They Retaliated.


⟡ “It’s Not Her. It’s the Ten Years of This.” ⟡

Polly Chromatic Discloses Social Work-Triggered Trauma to NHS and Kirsty Hornal — Forwarded to Legal Counsel Before Safeguarding Escalation

Filed: 13 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-13_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_NHS_TraumaDisclosure_SocialWorkHistory.pdf
Summary: Early trauma disclosure email detailing ten years of emotional harm from repeated social work involvement. Sent to Kirsty Hornal and NHS, then forwarded to solicitor Laura Savage.

I. What Happened

On 13 February 2025, Polly Chromatic emailed both Philip Reid (NHS) and Kirsty Hornal (WCC) to express the emotional and psychological toll caused by years of routine social work visits. She wrote:

“It’s not Kirsty — it’s just the long trauma of having so many social workers in our lives… I spend so much time crying…”

She described:

  • Emotional collapse after court dates and social worker visits

  • Feelings of being turned away after asking for help

  • A pattern of being emotionally destabilized by procedural reminders

  • Her wish to keep medical care (Dr Reid) free from institutional interference

  • That this isn’t about Kirsty as a person, but the system’s legacy of harm

She then forwarded the message to solicitor Laura Savage for legal documentation and advice.

II. What the Record Establishes

• Kirsty Hornal and NHS received a direct trauma disclosure
• The message predates both the police report and PLO threats
• Polly explicitly separates individual behaviour from institutional harm
• The legal chain of evidence begins here — making this the first trauma-anchored communication in the retaliation chain

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because trauma disclosures aren’t rhetorical. They’re warnings.
Because “It’s not her — it’s the system” is both generous and damning.
Because this email proves they knew. And what came after proves they didn’t care.

SWANK archives every prelude to silence — especially when it was emotionally fluent and institutionally ignored.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that emotional collapse after state contact is incidental.
We do not accept that disclosures are valid only when framed clinically.
We do not accept that acknowledgment is optional after distress is written down.

This wasn’t an outburst. It was trauma intelligence — and SWANK recorded it.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

No Assessment Because No One Adjusted — And Kirsty Was CC’d


⟡ “No One Was Smart Enough to Make an Adjustment — So We Filed.” ⟡

Polly Chromatic Forwards Health-Based Communication Barrier to Kirsty Hornal and Legal Counsel — Revealing Early Ignorance of Disability Adjustments

Filed: 27 December 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-04
📎 Download PDF – 2024-12-27_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_ReasonableAdjustment_RefusalToAccommodate.pdf
Summary: Forwarded email trail showing Polly Chromatic explaining her verbal disability to Westminster and Harley Street clinicians, with Kirsty Hornal copied — establishing early awareness of adjustments.

I. What Happened

On 27 December 2024, Polly Chromatic forwarded an email thread to Nannette Nicholson showing:

– That on 10 December 2024, she requested a refund from Harley Street Mental Health due to adjustment refusal
– That she clearly disclosed her disability, stating:

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult... I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”
– That Kirsty Hornal was cc’d
– That the assessment was blocked due to reception staff refusing to relay written information to a psychiatrist
– That legal counsel Laura Savage (Merali Beedle) was also included in the thread

II. What the Record Establishes

• Kirsty Hornal was given early direct knowledge of Polly’s verbal communication disability
• The adjustment was requested in clear, plain language
• Psychiatric harm and care obstruction were communicated and documented
• No safeguarding support or accommodation followed — only escalation
• Westminster can no longer claim lack of notice regarding disability needs

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because saying “I cannot speak” is a medical disclosure — not a rhetorical inconvenience.
Because forwarding this to Kirsty and Laura Savage proved the system knew — and still failed.
Because when adjustments are ignored, the archive must not be.

SWANK logs the request that came before the retaliation. Every time.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that disability must be restated after its first refusal.
We do not accept that psychiatric care can be denied for being written.
We do not accept that professionals can read this and claim they didn’t know.

This wasn’t an email. It was a disability disclosure.
And SWANK will file it until the silence is struck from the record.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions