Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): NHS Neglect

Showing posts with label NHS Neglect. Show all posts

The Quiet Collapse of Duty: NHS Watches While the Parent Schedules the Rescue.

⟡ “Three Children. One Mother. No System.” ⟡

The hospital never called. So the mother emailed — again — to offer all available times.

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_Email_Reid_DisabledChildrenRespiratoryConcern_VisitCoordination.pdf
An exhausted but composed email to Dr Philip Reid reveals ongoing respiratory concerns in three of the author’s disabled U.S. citizen children, and institutional reliance on her willingness to self-schedule crisis care.

I. What Happened

On 21 November 2024, Polly Chromatic emailed Dr. Reid requesting an appointment for three of her children: Heir, Kingdom, and Prerogative — all showing signs of respiratory distress.

Heir had been in critical condition earlier
Kingdom was deteriorating
Prerogative, though improving, remained unwell

The tone was calm. The message was clear:

“I can come in whenever you want.”

The email ended with a reminder that she would take them to A&E if needed — a threat disguised as grace.
She copied Kirsty Hornal and Laura Savage for accountability.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Escalating respiratory symptoms in three vulnerable children
Lack of proactive scheduling by the consultant
Reliance on the mother’s flexibility and silence
Documentation of worsening conditions and clinical concern
Continued disregard for parental disability and family burden

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because one mother shouldn’t be scheduling her own child’s emergency care.
Because she shouldn’t have to follow up — again — when her children can’t breathe.
Because this isn’t parenting — it’s triage.

IV. Violations

Duty of care breach by NHS (Reid) through delay and non-response
Passive safeguarding neglect by WCC (Hornal)
Breach of disability recognition protocols (verbal exemption ignored)
Systemic failure to implement proactive health interventions
Undue burden on a disabled caregiver to manage three vulnerable patients alone

V. SWANK’s Position

There is no drama in this email.
Only danger.

It documents three children at risk —
and a mother offering to make herself available
at any time
on any day
to a system that refuses to call her back.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

He Was Gasping. They Were Ghosting.

⟡ He Couldn’t Breathe. They Didn’t Care. ⟡
When a disabled child named Kingdom is turned away from emergency care, and every professional stays silent.

Filed: 22 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-22_SWANK_Email_Reid_EmergencyCareRefusal_KingdomBreathingCrisis.pdf
An urgent email documenting a child’s medical crisis, refusal of care by A&E staff, and the calculated indifference of every safeguarding and NHS professional copied — including Philip Reid, Sarah Newman, Kirsty Hornal, and Gideon Mpalanyi.

I. What Happened

Kingdom couldn’t breathe.
The A&E staff refused to treat him — just as they had previously refused his sister.
There was a visible pattern: disability + documentation = denial.
The mother, herself medically vulnerable, sent the warning shot.
She explained the hatred. The refusal. The ongoing risk.
She cc’d everyone.
Not one responded with urgency.
Not one intervened.

II. What the Email Establishes

That a disabled child was refused emergency medical care
That the refusal followed a pattern affecting other siblings
That Westminster and NHS officials were formally alerted in writing
That no safeguarding escalation occurred despite known risk
That this is not neglect — it is coordinated omission

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because when a child says “I can’t breathe,”
and an institution says “we don’t believe you,”
someone else needs to start writing things down.
Because medical racism and disability erasure don’t always scream —
sometimes they just ignore.

IV. Violations Identified

Refusal of Emergency Medical Treatment
Disability Discrimination Against U.S. Citizen Children
Racial and Familial Targeting Within NHS Settings
Non-Response from Safeguarding Authorities Despite Crisis
Procedural Normalisation of Medical Neglect

V. SWANK’s Position

This was not a mistake. It was a method.
They’ve ignored every diagnosis. Every exemption. Every report.
And when Kingdom couldn’t breathe —
they didn’t panic.
They proceeded.
Now so do we.

The Archive Requested Advocacy. Let History Show Who Answered. — Liberty Has Been Notified

⟡ Liberty Contacted. State Retaliation Declared. Support Requested. ⟡

“I am writing as the mother of a disabled family facing active state retaliation through fabricated safeguarding and coordinated misconduct.”

Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/LIBERTY/ACCESS-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_Liberty_RequestForSupport_DisabledFamily_SafeguardingRetaliation.pdf
A formal request for human rights advocacy submitted to Liberty. The letter outlines documented retaliation by police, NHS trusts, and social workers against a medically disabled family pursuing lawful legal claims. Public interest is no longer theoretical — it’s archived.

I. What Happened

On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, Director of SWANK London Ltd., submitted a support request to Liberty, the UK’s leading civil rights organisation.

The letter summarises:

Criminal safeguarding misuse
Retaliation for disability-based legal filings
NHS neglect and obstruction of medical care
Multi-agency coordination across police, social workers, and state services
Ongoing civil and judicial proceedings totalling £23 million in damages

It also attaches:

A written-only communication policy
Evidence-based summaries already submitted to regulators, courts, and journalists

II. What the Filing Establishes

That Liberty is now on record as having received a formal request tied to legal, medical, and human rights abuse
That the state has retaliated against a disabled mother and four children across institutional boundaries
That this is not a local dispute, but a systemic failure of care, access, and law
That support was sought — before the archive simply documented the silence

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because the human rights sector must respond when systems collude.
Because disability retaliation is not accidental.
Because asking for support is an evidentiary act when power fails the vulnerable.

This isn’t a whisper.
It’s a procedural record.
Liberty has been notified — and now, Liberty is archived.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that advocacy only applies post-detention.
We do not accept the erasure of state-based harm when the survivor is articulate.
We do not accept that a disabled woman must scream for support to deserve it.

SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If the regulators fail,
We notify the rights groups.
If the rights groups go silent,
We publish that too.
And if no one defends the disabled,
We write it down in font large enough to indict.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

𝒀𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕 𝒖𝒔, 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒔𝒊𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒖𝒔.

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 21 November 2024

We Do Not Argue. We Archive.

Filed Under: Bullying in A&E, NHS Defensiveness, Verbal Refusal, Respiratory Abuse, SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty (et al.),

“I do not waste my time arguing with people.”

This is not silence.
This is strategy.

“They either want to help or they don’t. It’s that simple.”

And when they don’t? I do what sovereign archivists do best—
I document.

I file. I publish. I dismantle.

Because when you argue with a breathless mother,
you reveal who you serve—and it isn’t care.

“I cannot speak verbally to argue or explain things period.”

Let me translate:
I am not the problem.
Your communication expectations are.

“The hospital bullies me and my children every time we have a respiratory issue…”

And still you dare call it support.
No. It is clinical coercion by disbelief.

“Talking exacerbates my asthma.”
“My asthma is worse now because of that ignorant doctor.”

And this is why I speak only through the written record.
Typed. Filed. Forwarded.

You refused treatment.
I responded with documented clarity.

You denied belief.
I delivered archival consequence.

—

📍 Typed Between Attacks. Filed Without Permission.
𝒫𝑜𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝒞𝒽𝓇𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸, Non-Verbal Strategist, Director of Breath-Controlled Resistance

📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Hostilities Monitored.

—

Labels: A&E bullying, asthma abuse, hospital neglect, NHS misconduct, verbal refusal, archival retaliation, SWANK maternal strategy

—

Search Description:
Mother refuses verbal conflict with NHS. Hospital accused of bullying and neglect. Asthma worsened by doctor. Future conflicts to be archived, not argued.

The System That Both Makes You Sick and Refuses to Hear You Explain Why

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
“The Abuse Cycle: As Diagnosed by a Disabled Mother”

Filed Under: Communication Abuse · Asthma Ignorance · Hospital Harm · Systemic Loop · Verbal Demands · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty (and Co-Conspirators in the Cycle),

Let me diagram your cruelty in three simple steps:

You demand I speak — knowing full well it worsens my condition.
I become ill — and the NHS refuses to treat my asthma.
The refusal becomes justification for more pressure.

That is not service.
That is abuse.
And it has a name: The Loop.

“Does anyone want my perspective?”

No.
You want compliance theatre. You want performance, not communication.
And when I fail to perform, you diagnose my exhaustion as noncooperation.

So here are my legally-enforceable answers:

A disability advocate, to protect against further clinical violence
A GP-issued asthma directive, because the NHS forgets lungs exist
A written-only protocol, because I refuse to be cross-examined for air

You don’t misunderstand.
You reproduce harm on schedule.

You aren’t uninformed.
You are procedurally hostile by design.

And I am no longer asking for oxygen in your dialect.
I’m filing it.

—

📍 Formally Diagnosed by:
Polly Chromatic
Clinical Witness to State-Orchestrated Oxygen Sabotage
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Loops Logged.

The Abuse Cycle You Call ‘Procedure.’

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024

STOP FORCING ME TO EXPLAIN VERBALLY. YOU’RE CAUSING THE ILLNESS.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic

Filed Under: Verbal Demand Abuse, Asthma Mismanagement, Institutional Repetition, NHS Neglect, Medical Adjustment Refusal, Cycle of Collapse, Disabled Family Defence

To: Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Harley Street Mental Health
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Archivist of the Repeating Collapse

🌀 THE ABUSE CYCLE THEY ALL PARTICIPATE IN:

“Everyone tries to force me to explain things verbally repeatedly, which exacerbates my asthma. And they also get angry if I try to communicate via email.”
“Does anyone want my perspective?”
“When I get sick—or my kids get sick—the hospital is so ignorant about asthma that they refuse us treatment.”
“And the cycle continues.”

🧠 PROPOSED SOLUTIONS (WHICH WILL BE IGNORED):

A disability advocate for my family.
A letter from our GP to carry to A&E every time.
Hospitals provide adjustments so I don’t have to speak verbally at all.

This is not complicated.
But bureaucrats need confusion to justify inaction.

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (UNHEARD YET AGAIN):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Yet instead of assistance,
I receive verbal demand, disbelief, and delay.

🔁 LET ME MAKE THIS CLEAR ONE FINAL TIME:

You're not helping.
You're triggering collapse.
You're not confused.
You're refusing to change.

Polly Chromatic
Refusing to repeat myself for your comfort.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com

Labels: Kirsty Hornal, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Harley Street, asthma discrimination, verbal demand abuse, GP letter workaround, A&E adjustment failure, NHS negligence, email clarity rejected, medical discrimination, SWANK testimony dispatch

The Email That Dared to Be Right: Why Systems Collapse When Language Doesn’t Flatter

⟡ The Immaturity of the Employees Involved ⟡

A Complaint That Was Too Accurate to Be Answered — So It Was Ignored

Filed: 2 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-02_SWANK_Email_WCC_Reid_CommunicationBreakdownComplaint.pdf
Direct complaint from Polly Chromatic to Westminster and NHS officials, citing group immaturity, blame deflection, and verbal disability, submitted amid communication collapse.

I. What Happened

On 15 October 2024, Polly Chromatic sent a sharply-worded but medically grounded email to Westminster Children’s Services — including Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena — as well as NHS clinician Philip Reid.

The email identified a breakdown in communication stemming from professional immaturity, blame redirection, and disregard for disability accommodations. She wrote that verbal interaction was medically unsafe and reaffirmed a written-only communication boundary.

The tone was cutting. The facts were clean. The response was: nothing. No accommodation, no apology, no correction.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Medical adjustment requests were issued in plain language, to named officials
Staff misbehaviour was identified as a source of systemic failure
The NHS and local authority were jointly informed and took no remedial steps
Disability disclosures were dismissed as tone rather than treated as law
Blame-shifting was called out — and instead of reform, they retaliated

III. Why SWANK Logged It

This email is not merely early-stage correspondence. It is the tone that triggered a system-wide panic.

It revealed a truth no policy document could hide: that safeguarding mechanisms were staffed by those unfit to recognise injury, incapable of professional humility, and allergic to directness.

SWANK logs it because it shows the moment the system chose retaliation over reflection. It shows what happens when truth is written too clearly to be misfiled.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This was not a communication breakdown.
It was a jurisdictional embarrassment, ignored to preserve ego.

We do not accept that blunt honesty voids legal validity.
We do not accept that calling something “demented” makes the medical notice disappear.
We will document every unacknowledged truth — especially the ones that stung too much to answer.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

⟡ “Three Children. One Mother. No System.” ⟡

I. What Happened

II. What the Complaint Establishes

III. Why SWANK Filed It

IV. Violations

V. SWANK’s Position

I. What Happened

II. What the Email Establishes

III. Why SWANK Filed It

IV. Violations Identified

V. SWANK’s Position

⟡ Liberty Contacted. State Retaliation Declared. Support Requested. ⟡

I. What Happened

II. What the Filing Establishes

III. Why SWANK Logged It

IV. SWANK’s Position

🌀 THE ABUSE CYCLE THEY ALL PARTICIPATE IN:

🧠 PROPOSED SOLUTIONS (WHICH WILL BE IGNORED):

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (UNHEARD YET AGAIN):

🔁 LET ME MAKE THIS CLEAR ONE FINAL TIME:

⟡ The Immaturity of the Employees Involved ⟡

I. What Happened

II. What the Complaint Establishes

III. Why SWANK Logged It

IV. SWANK’s Position

Documented Obsessions