⟡ Media Briefing Filed: Multi-Agency Abuse, Medical Harm, Legal Proof ⟡
“I am a disabled mother who has been repeatedly targeted for retaliation after requesting lawful disability adjustments and submitting formal legal complaints.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/MEDIA/BRIEFING-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_MediaBriefing_MultiAgencyAbuse_DisabledFamilyEvidence.pdf
A formal media briefing sent to investigative journalist Maeve McClenaghan. Encloses legal and medical evidence of multi-agency retaliation, fabricated safeguarding, and the weaponisation of care systems against a disabled family.
I. What Happened
On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, Director of SWANK London Ltd., issued a formal press briefing to journalist Maeve McClenaghan at The Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
The briefing includes:
A synopsis of multi-agency harm involving social workers, police, and NHS Trusts
Summary of civil, regulatory, and criminal filings already on record
Disclosure of written-only medical adjustments repeatedly violated
Evidence of safeguarding abuse, negligence, and institutional collusion
Direct reference to Equality Act breaches and formal regulatory escalation
This is not an informal tip-off.
It is a procedural act of public witness.
II. What the Briefing Establishes
That a public-interest reporter has been formally notified
That the case involves disabled children, regulatory evasion, and state-based retaliation
That enclosed materials meet the threshold for investigation, not summary dismissal
That silence in response will also become part of the record
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when legal complaints vanish into mailboxes,
And medical accommodations are treated as invitations for harm,
And safeguarding is weaponised by those meant to protect —
The press must be notified.
Not because we hope — but because we file.
If power won’t acknowledge the truth,
SWANK sends it to someone who will.
And if no one listens,
We publish the silence with the same level of proof.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that media interest must be begged.
We do not accept that evidence must scream to be seen.
We do not accept institutional collusion as untouchable.
SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If the regulators fail,
We brief the press.
If the press ignores,
We archive the notice.
And if no one acts —
We remain the record.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.