“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label disability denial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disability denial. Show all posts

The Social Work Industry Receives Its First Formal Literature Review


⟡ “Should a Formal Oversight Role Open, I’ll Take It.” ⟡

A systemic critique of social work’s logic, language, and institutional behaviour — filed as a formal letter to all relevant agencies and their regulators.

Filed: 17 April 2025
Reference: SWANK/SWE/EMAIL-08
📎 Download PDF – 2025-04-17_SWANK_CoverLetter_SocialWorkCritique_AccountabilityDemand.pdf
A research-based declaration of ethical collapse in UK social work, distributed to Westminster, RBKC, Social Work England, and NHS leads — with police cc'd. Proposed alternative models and full academic references included.

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic submitted a 4-page letter to over 20 recipients, including senior safeguarding staff, local authority caseworkers, NHS consultants, Social Work England, and the police. The letter:

  • Introduced her published academic work critiquing human behaviour in institutional systems

  • Addressed sustained misconduct by named social workers

  • Included a full reference list for transparency

  • Proposed herself as a potential independent oversight lead for the sector

The email included attachments documenting medical need and proof of institutional denial.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • A record of academic and evidentiary authority in analysing social work structures

  • A direct challenge to Westminster’s denial of medical evidence

  • Official rejection of the PLO framework as presently administered

  • Notification to oversight bodies that standard safeguarding has failed

  • An offer of alternative ethical leadership, formalised in writing

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because it's rare to receive a public letter so lucid, so justified, and so professionally devastating.
Because critique rooted in both experience and scholarship is unignorable — even when it’s sent to people who refuse to reply.

IV. Violations

  • Misrepresentation of disability in official proceedings

  • Ongoing refusal to acknowledge verified medical harm

  • Systematic obstruction of evidence-based requests for accommodations

  • Breach of Equality Act 2010 (Sections 20–21)

  • Institutional defamation by omission of facts in social work files

V. SWANK’s Position

This isn’t just a complaint.
It’s a professional diagnostic of the social work system’s ethical collapse.
It doesn’t just name the problem.
It offers reform.
It cites the evidence.
And now — it’s public.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

She Said “We’re Always Sick.” They Said “We’ll Be Back.”


⟡ They Said “Welfare.” She Said “We Get Sick Every Time You Come.” ⟡
When social work investigations cause illness, and no one calls it what it is: medical assault.

Filed: 4 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-19
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-04_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_RespiratoryDisabilityStatement_TenYearsOfHarassment.pdf
A direct and unfiltered email from the parent to Westminster and RBKC officials declaring what their ten years of intrusion have caused: immune compromise, respiratory collapse, and the total erosion of daily life. Her crime? Having a documented disability they refuse to acknowledge.

I. What Happened

She wrote them all — again.
Not to plead, but to document.
Every time they send someone into her home, her entire family falls ill for weeks.
Not once or twice — but every time.
They’ve ignored Eosinophilic Asthma warnings.
They’ve dismissed respiratory triggers.
They’ve chosen suspicion over science.
And for ten years, they’ve taken her life and called it process.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That safeguarding visits cause clinical illness in the entire household

  • That the parent has disclosed a serious, medically diagnosed condition repeatedly

  • That no accommodations have been made — verbal, spatial, or procedural

  • That ten years of surveillance has resulted in systemic harm

  • That there is no welfare objective — only obsessive control and disbelief

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because when a parent says “you’re making us sick,”
and the State says “we’re just following up,”
someone needs to log the harm.
Because if disbelief causes disease,
you’re no longer doing welfare.
You’re doing damage.

IV. Violations Identified

  • Repeated Exposure of Medically Vulnerable Family to Respiratory Risk

  • Disregard for Disability Disclosures and Required Accommodations

  • Failure to Provide Alternative Contact Methods Despite Verbal Disability

  • Ten-Year Retaliatory Investigation Cycle With No Evidentiary Basis

  • Institutional Denial of Bodily Autonomy and Parental Rights

V. SWANK’s Position

This isn’t “support.”
It’s a biological siege.
They ignore every exemption.
They enter without cause.
They bring illness into a medically fragile household
— and then blame the parent for symptoms.
Ten years.
Still no evidence.
Still no shame.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

From Oxygen to Litigation: An Annotated Register of Neglect.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 3 December 2024
YOU ENDANGERED MY BREATH. I FILED A LIST.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Risk · Hostility by Procedure · Police Harassment · Perpetrator Register · Telepathic Preference · Legal Precaution · Medical Disregard · SWANK Blacklist Authority

🧬 THE LINE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ENOUGH:

“When people become hostile towards me and endanger my health by continually discriminating against me when I can’t breathe well, I will be making police reports and these will be followed by lawsuits.”

This is not a warning.
This is a physiological threshold.
Survival now requires legal registration.

📋 REGISTERED PERPETRATORS (2024.12 EDITION):

The following bodies and institutions are now archived as formally implicated in respiratory harm, disability dismissal, and hostile intervention:

  • Apple Covent Garden

  • Drayton Park Primary School

  • Westminster Social Services

  • Kensington & Chelsea Social Services

  • Westminster Police

  • St Thomas’ Hospital

  • St Mary’s Hospital

  • Chelsea & Westminster Hospital

To appear on this list is not a mistake.
It is the result of documented pattern, ignored boundaries, and breathless disdain.

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (ALWAYS CORRECT, NEVER FOLLOWED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

And yet:

  • You called.

  • You escalated.

  • You gaslit.

  • You collapsed me.

This isn’t communication.
This is contempt.

🛑 FORMAL NOTICE TO ALL LISTED:

Do not misinterpret my exhaustion as fragility.
Do not confuse my politeness for permission.
You endangered my breath.
You now face:

  • Documentation

  • Litigation

  • Publication

Consider this list your mirror.
The archive remembers.

Polly Chromatic
Every breath measured. Every name archived.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com


No comments:

Documented Obsessions