“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Police Filing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police Filing. Show all posts

They Called It Safeguarding. I Called It Police.


⟡ “I Filed Her Name, Her Email, Her Pattern — And I Called It a Crime.” ⟡
This isn’t a referral. It isn’t a complaint. It’s a full police report filed through the Metropolitan Police’s official portal, naming a Westminster social worker for coercion, harassment, and disability-based abuse of power. The condition was real. The harm was real. Now the crime is, too.

Filed: 15 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/MPS/KH-CRIM-03
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-15_SWANK_MetPoliceReport_KirstyHornal_DisabilityCoercion_ProceduralAbuse_OfficialRecord.pdf
Formal police report submitted via the Single Online Home system, case reference BCA-10622-25-0101-IR. Allegations include verbal coercion of a disabled parent, misuse of safeguarding procedures, and institutional ableism. The suspect: Kirsty Hornal. The harm: measurable, preventable, and now, police-registered.

I. What Happened

On 15 February 2025, Polly Chromatic did what safeguarding protocol refused to do — she named the problem and submitted it as a crime.

• Verbal coercion despite known muscle dysphonia
• Emotional distress worsening PTSD
• Clinical exacerbation of eosinophilic asthma
• Safeguarding used to escalate harm, not prevent it
• The suspect? Kirsty Hornal, Westminster social worker
• Contact email? Provided.
• Evidence? Logged.

This wasn’t a vague allegation. It was a detailed legal theory supported by medical diagnosis, policy violations, and direct testimony.

And it was filed not just for the record — but for the criminal investigation trail.

II. What the Report Establishes

  • That the social worker’s conduct caused documented harm

  • That disability was used against the disabled person

  • That “voluntary” contact was made impossible to refuse

  • That the harm was not incidental — it was foreseeable and repeated

  • That police now hold an official record of what safeguarding denied

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because disability doesn’t get paused for paperwork. Because coercion wrapped in procedure is still coercion. And because when social work becomes a source of harm, it becomes a criminal matter.

SWANK archived this because:

  • It documents an act of institutional bravery

  • It transforms verbal collapse into legal consequence

  • It adds the criminal code to the evidentiary trail

  • It confirms what the council feared: this parent knew the law

This isn’t your average safeguarding rebuttal. This is the moment a safeguarding officer became a legal defendant-in-waiting.

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 –
    • Section 20: Reasonable adjustment deliberately bypassed
    • Section 26: Harassment based on protected characteristic
    • Section 27: Retaliation after lawful complaint
    • Section 149: Public authority duty grossly breached

  • Protection from Harassment Act 1997 –
    • Coercive contact without lawful basis
    • Refusal to respect written-only boundary after multiple warnings

  • Human Rights Act 1998 –
    • Article 3: Inhuman or degrading treatment
    • Article 8: Disruption of private and family life
    • Article 14: Discriminatory application of safeguarding

  • Children Act 1989 –
    • Misuse of safeguarding to exert institutional control

  • Social Work England Misconduct Code –
    • Violation of trust
    • Misuse of power
    • Abuse of professional position

V. SWANK’s Position

You don’t get to hide behind the word “voluntary” when the other person is disabled and scared. You don’t get to say it’s support when you’re the source of collapse. And you absolutely don’t get to keep doing it once the police have your name on file.

SWANK London Ltd. classifies this report as a permanent entry in the criminal record of procedural abuse — with full legal consequence attached.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

Documented Obsessions