⟡ Shadow Report Filed with the United Nations: UK State Retaliation Documented ⟡
“They violated disability rights. They used safeguarding as reprisal. We sent it to Geneva.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/UN/SHADOW-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_UN_ShadowReport_DisabilityGenderViolence_UKStateRetaliation.pdf
A formal shadow report submitted to the UN Special Rapporteurs on Disability, Violence Against Women, and the Urgent Action Unit. It details systemic safeguarding retaliation, disability-based access denial, and gender-targeted harm by UK state actors — including police, local councils, NHS Trusts, and regulators. SWANK documents the international dimension of domestic misconduct.
I. What Happened
On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, on behalf of Noelle Jasmine Meline Bonnee Annee Simlett, filed a shadow report with the United Nations, citing:
UK violations of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
Systemic abuse of power under the guise of child safeguarding
Repeated breaches of a written-only medical adjustment
Institutional obstruction of legal, medical, and parental rights
Gender-based harm violating the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
Ongoing retaliation described as procedural, strategic, and state-sanctioned
The report also references:
A live Judicial Review in the High Court
Formal filings to PHSO, EHRC, ICO, IOPC, SWE, and Parliament
Medical harm and rights violations affecting four children
Archival documentation available at www.swankarchive.com
II. What the Report Establishes
That UK domestic mechanisms failed — prompting international escalation
That this is not an isolated incident, but a pattern of state retaliation
That the harm includes intersecting violations of disability, gender, and family rights
That the United Nations has now been notified, under shadow report authority
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when every regulator is silent,
When ombudsmen delay and courts narrow their scope,
And when retaliation is codified in the name of care —
The only option left is international exposure.
This isn’t lobbying.
It’s archiving.
And if the UN doesn’t act,
The record already has.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that safeguarding means silencing.
We do not accept that state actors can violate medical law without consequence.
We do not accept that a mother’s identity must be fractured to be heard.
SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If the UK violates UN treaties,
We file a report.
If retaliation crosses borders,
We write the geography of harm.
And if no one reads it in Geneva —
They’ll read it here.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.