🪞SWANK London Ltd.
The Evidentiary Catalogue of Procedural Abuse
The Bleeding of the Boy – A Mother's Dispatch to a Deaf State
(Re: URGENT Interview Request for Regal – Bloody Knuckles, Journal Distress, and Disability Violations)
🗂 Filed: 3 August 2025
📁 Reference: SWANK-2308-REGAL
📄 PDF: 2025-08-03_SWANK_Letter_MetPolice_RegalInterviewRequest.pdf
📌 Summary: Met Police informed of Regal’s injury, emotional collapse, and institutional abuse. Interview urgently demanded.
I. What Happened
A formal safeguarding escalation was submitted by Polly Chromatic on 3 August 2025, requesting a trauma-informed police interview for her eldest son, Regal (16), following observed injuries and disclosures of distress. Regal, a U.S. citizen and primary sibling protector, discreetly handed his mother a handwritten journal during a court-ordered contact session. The journal described emotional abandonment, disorientation, and isolation. Bloody knuckles were visible.
Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Police placed three unsolicited phone calls to Polly — ignoring not only her documented disability (trauma-induced dysphonia) but also her clearly stated voicemail and written instructions to communicate by email only.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
This is not merely a request for action; it is a declaration of escalation. The evidence submitted includes:
Regal’s handwritten journal, expressing despair, fear, and the burden of sibling care.
A visible injury (bloody knuckles) noted under supervised contact.
Prior police reports naming both carers and social workers as sources of harm.
A pattern of discriminatory disregard for the mother’s communication needs — despite disclosure in police reports, voicemail, and email headers.
Polly Chromatic, acting as both legal advocate and archivist of harm, demands formal recognition of Regal's distress and an immediate, uninterrupted, trauma-informed safeguarding interview — free from social worker obstruction.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because a 16-year-old wrote, “no one is there for me,” while his knuckles bled.
Because trauma shouldn’t be editorialised by carers or filtered through institutional PR.
Because the police — already in possession of multiple reports — continue to phone a disabled woman with a medically documented voice disorder.
Because this isn’t safeguarding. It’s state-authored emotional harm.
IV. Violations
Equality Act 2010, Section 20 – failure to provide reasonable communication adjustments
Section 149, Public Sector Equality Duty – discriminatory service delivery
ECHR Article 14 – interference with procedural and disability rights
UNCRC Articles 12 & 19 – right of the child to be heard and protected from violence
PACE 1984, Code C – requirement for appropriate, independent handling of vulnerable child interviews
V. SWANK’s Position
SWANK London Ltd. asserts that the UK safeguarding system has once again mistaken its own power for a substitute for care. Regal has asked — in writing, in bruises, and in silence — for someone to notice. His journal and his injuries speak louder than the state’s policies.
The Metropolitan Police have 24 hours to respond.
Not to a mother — but to a boy bleeding in plain sight.
All evidence is on record at:
🔗 www.swanklondon.com
(See: Safeguarding Log | Police Reports | Journal Evidence)
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.