⟡ SWANK Submission Record ⟡
Formal Complaint: Disability Breach by Metropolitan Police
Filed: 3 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/IOPC/2025-06-03
📄 Download Full PDF – 2025-06-03_SWANK_IOPC_DisabilityBreach_HomeVisit.pdf
I. What Happened
On 3 June 2025, two police officers from the Metropolitan Police attended my residence — London W2 — in direct breach of:
A documented medical communication adjustment requiring written contact only
A visible front-door sign requesting no verbal or in-person engagement
Diagnosed disabilities, including Eosinophilic Asthma, muscle tension dysphonia, and PTSD, all of which were known to relevant authorities
This visit occurred without invitation, without urgency, and without justification. The result was acute psychological distress, medical destabilisation, and re-traumatisation. Their actions disregarded multiple legal protections.
II. Grounds for Complaint
The complaint to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) details four core violations:
🚫 Breach of the Equality Act 2010
📜 Violation of Article 8 – Human Rights Act 1998
⚖️ Failure to uphold lawful and visible disability adjustments
🧠 Institutional retraumatisation through coercive conduct
This is not a misunderstanding. It is policy contempt dressed as protocol.
III. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept “oops” as a legal defence when the State knocks — uninvited — on the door of a disabled mother, already recovering from institutional harassment.
This complaint has been filed with both the IOPC and the Metropolitan Police’s Professional Standards Department, and forms part of a broader archive of retaliatory misconduct against medically vulnerable individuals who assert their rights.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.