“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label shielding breach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shielding breach. Show all posts

I’m High Risk, Not High Drama — Leave Me Alone So I Can Breathe

 📮 SWANK Dispatch: My Asthma Is Not a Crime — But Your Harassment Might Be

🗓️ 30 June 2020

Filed Under: asthma discrimination, shielding violation, health harassment, false accusations, community hostility, pandemic vulnerability, NHS guidance ignored, public health failure, legal retaliation

“My diagnosis is severe eosinophilic asthma.
Not ‘difficult mother.’ Not ‘suspicious parent.’
Just: a person who cannot survive your ignorance.”
— A Mother Documenting Medical Fact as Legal Shield

This sharply articulated letter by Polly Chromatic, addressed to the Department of Social Development, is not merely a declaration of illness — it is a legally grounded plea for respect, space, and air.

It outlines her decades-long history with a life-threatening medical condition — severe eosinophilic asthma — and how local hostility, institutional ignorance, and social work overreach have placed her and her children at risk.

🧾 I. The Medical Facts Are Not Up for Debate

From the NHS (UK) and CDC (USA):

  • Polly is clinically extremely vulnerable (high risk)

  • She is on continuous oral steroids (prednisone)

  • Shielding guidance includes:

    • No uninvited visitors

    • Avoidance of all triggers (disinfectants, perfumes, stress, smoke, etc.)

    • Calm environments essential for asthma control

⚠️ II. What the Department Has Done Instead

  • Ignored shielding protocol

  • Repeatedly allowed false child abuse allegations based on lifestyle accommodations (no smoking, no toxic products, etc.)

  • Permitted harassment from neighbours who resist her boundaries

  • Created stressful encounters with social workers and truancy officers during a global respiratory pandemic

  • Continued to operate in a way that increases her risk of hospitalisation or death

🧠 III. Clarifying the Actual Issue

This is not about parenting.
This is not about truancy.
This is not about attitude.

This is about:

  • Medical discrimination

  • Public misunderstanding of asthma

  • Systemic punishment of individuals who enforce their own health boundaries

  • Abuse of statutory resources to pursue false claims while ignoring medical law

📌 Final Point:

“False allegations of child abuse are a crime.”

And so is ignoring a medically documented need for safety.
This letter doesn’t ask for sympathy.
It demands legal and ethical conduct — with the evidence attached.


No comments:

You Were Not Investigating. You Were Circling.


⟡ A Ministry of Harm: Filing What the Islands Forgot ⟡

Filed: 6 August 2020
Reference: SWANK/TCI/2020-COMPLAINT-COMMISSION
📎 Download PDF — 2020-08-06_SWANK_TCI_ComplaintsCommission_SocialDevComplaint_MedicalAssault_TruancyThreat.pdf

I. A Government That Would Not Stop Arriving

This formal complaint was filed to the Complaints Commission of the Turks and Caicos Islands, after three years of institutional surveillance so repetitive, so medically reckless, so politely colonial — it became indistinguishable from harassment in slow motion.

The core facts:

  • The parent complied with all educational laws

  • The children were healthy, documented, and schooled

  • The mother had disabling respiratory illness

Yet despite this:

  • Unlawful home visits continued

  • Police were used to enforce attendance at the Ministry

  • A medical incident occurred on their premises

And even after all that?
They left the file open — “in case.”

This is not safeguarding. This is jurisdictional addiction.

II. What This Complaint Documented

This complaint was filed after obedience failed.
It includes allegations of:

  • Repeated breaches of medical shielding

  • Coercive requests for documents already submitted

  • Emotional harm to children through constant monitoring

  • The use of uniformed officers to enforce procedural humiliation

  • A complete absence of closure despite full compliance

It is not a request. It is a record of betrayal.

III. Who Was Involved

Named or implicated:

  • Ashley Adams-Forbes – orchestrating repeated visits

  • Truancy enforcement officers – untrained, unaccountable, and dispatched without legal basis

  • Ministry of Education staff – incapable of updating their own compliance records

  • Medical responders – present not as protectors, but as tools of compliance theatre

Let the record show: every name was already on file.
SWANK simply arranged the citation.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not consider repetitive intrusion to be care.
We do not confuse medical collapse with compliance failure.
We do not accept that silence from a Complaints Commission is neutrality.

This document was filed because:

  • The laws were followed

  • The mother was medically exempt

  • The record needed to exist — before they revised it

This is not vengeance. It is administrative survival.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions