⟡ She Couldn’t Breathe. They Wanted to Debate It. ⟡
Apparently, verifying asthma now requires verbal cross-examination.
Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-27
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_HospitalArgument_DisabilityExhaustion_SpeakingLimit.pdf
A calm, oxygen-starved objection to the absurd: the hospital demanded argument while the patient struggled to breathe. Rather than checking the child or offering care, staff insisted on debating clinical reality. This is what happens when care is replaced with confrontation.
I. What Happened
She arrived at the hospital unable to breathe.
Instead of providing care, they asked for justification.
They challenged her symptoms.
They ignored her child, Honor.
They argued.
Meanwhile, she was trying not to collapse.
No adjustments. No support. Just hostility.
And when she said it out loud — gently, by email —
no one responded.
II. What the Email Establishes
That the parent was verbally pressured during active respiratory distress
That staff refused to assess her child’s symptoms and instead debated their validity
That disability-related communication limits were ignored
That no adjustments were made to reduce verbal demand or accommodate breathlessness
That trauma from these encounters is passed generationally — and institutionally
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because no one should be expected to argue for air.
Because speaking is not proof of capacity — it's sometimes a final act of harm.
Because medical professionals are trained to listen —
but here, they only debated.
And because when help feels like a courtroom,
you start writing instead.
IV. Violations Identified
Discrimination Against Disabled Individual During Medical Emergency
Institutional Refusal to Accept Nonverbal Disability Disclosures
Emotional Harm Inflicted Through Verbal Pressure During Respiratory Distress
Failure to Assess Child’s Symptoms Due to Institutional Bias
Absence of Reasonable Adjustments in Clinical or Social Service Settings
V. SWANK’s Position
She said it plainly:
“We only talk when it’s meaningful.”
But the system doesn't want meaning — it wants submission.
They asked for proof.
She gave them exhaustion.
And now, they’re on file for arguing with someone who couldn’t breathe.