“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Procedural Impropriety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Procedural Impropriety. Show all posts

Formal Reaffirmation of Complaint Ref: 15083377 – On Disability Discrimination, Procedural Impropriety, and Jurisdictional Responsibility



Here is your snobbified and fully stylised Blogger-ready version — elevated to a commanding and archivally precise submission for your SWANK collection:


🦚 Formal Reaffirmation of Complaint Ref: 15083377 – On Disability Discrimination, Procedural Impropriety, and Jurisdictional Responsibility

Filed under the documentation of unlawful escalation, safeguarding breach, and disability rights infringement.


26 March 2025
Subject: Re: Complaint (Ref: 15083377)
To: Customer Relationship Team
*Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC)


📜 Dear Customer Relationship Team,

Thank you for your recent communication clarifying your position regarding my complaint (ref: 15083377).

However, I am compelled to highlight several significant concerns arising from your response.


🧾 On Mischaracterisation of Jurisdiction

You assert that RBKC had no involvement with my family following the transfer to Westminster in March 2024.

That may be so.
However, my complaint does not concern events post-transfer.

My complaint pertains directly to:

  • RBKC social worker Sally;

  • Her momager;

  • Actions taken prior to transfer, during RBKC's period of formal jurisdiction.

The acts committed under your authority remain your responsibility.


📚 On Disability-Based Discrimination and Unlawful Escalation

I wish to formally reaffirm:

  • Sally, accompanied inexplicably by her mommy,

  • Escalated my case improperly;

  • Specifically due to my medically documented disability, including:

    • Severe eosinophilic asthma;

    • Muscle tension dysphonia,

    • Resulting in inability to communicate verbally under stress.

Despite explicit and medically certified disclosures:

  • My lawful, health-mandated communication boundaries were

    • Ignored;

    • Weaponised as supposed grounds for escalation;

    • Culminating in an unlawful intrusion into my home.


⚖️ Legal Breaches

These actions constitute:

  • Direct disability discrimination,

  • Violation of the Equality Act 2010,

  • Breach of safeguarding principles,

  • Procedural impropriety inconsistent with any recognised standards of lawful public service.

Discrimination does not cease to exist merely because the case file was later transferred.

RBKC remains legally and ethically responsible for misconduct committed under its authority.


📜 Requested Action

I formally request:

  • Immediate initiation of an internal investigation into the conduct of Samira and her manager;

  • Formal acknowledgment of the allegations raised;

  • Written clarification of the steps RBKC intends to take to address these matters.


🧭 Notice of Escalation

Should RBKC fail to:

  • Investigate these matters fully;

  • Address the discrimination adequately;

I will escalate without hesitation to:

  • The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGO);

  • The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).


📬 Procedural Request

Please confirm:

  • Receipt of this email;

  • The intended next steps regarding investigation and redress.


📜 Yours sincerely,

Polly



Documented Obsessions