⟡ University of Iowa – Pediatric Asthma Diagnosis ⟡
Filed: 5 March 1981
Reference: SWANK/UniversityOfIowa/PC-77057
Download PDF: 1981-03-05_Core_PC-77057_UniversityOfIowa_PediatricAsthmaDiagnosis.pdf
Summary: Foundational U.S. paediatric asthma diagnosis establishing chronic steroid-dependent respiratory disability from infancy.
I. What Happened
• On 9 January 1981, baby Polly Chromatic (aged eleven months) was examined in the Pediatric Allergy–Pulmonary Clinic at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.
• Attending physicians Dr. Miles Weinberger and Dr. Alan Stillerman confirmed a pattern of chronic, steroid-dependent asthma with three prior hospitalisations.
• The report records normal x-rays and labs, ongoing wheezing, and continuous Slo-Phyllin and Prednisone therapy.
• This diagnosis formally anchors a lifelong respiratory disability, predating all U.K. jurisdictional activity by four decades.
II. What the Document Establishes
• Medical confirmation of a lifelong chronic respiratory disability.
• Establishes pre-existing condition continuity for Equality Act and human-rights contexts.
• Demonstrates historical medical legitimacy unaffected by later procedural distortion.
• Illustrates clinical stability, diagnostic clarity, and early professional accountability.
• Acts as foundation document for all subsequent filings referencing disability.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
• It is the origin text — the respiratory genesis of all later legal, medical, and safeguarding claims.
• Serves as a time-stamped factual anchor: evidence of disability before institutional mischaracterisation.
• Represents medical authenticity untouched by policy fashion or bureaucratic revisionism.
• Demonstrates continuity of condition from infancy to adult procedural history.
IV. Applicable Standards & Violations
• Equality Act 2010 s.6 — Chronic respiratory disability (protected condition).
• UN CRPD Article 25 — Right to health and habilitation.
• ECHR Article 8 — Respect for private life, including historic medical identity.
• NHS Constitution §3(b) — Continuity of care (systemically breached in subsequent decades).
V. SWANK’s Position
This is not “historic medical trivia.”
This is clinical lineage — the evidentiary spine of a lifetime.
• We do not accept the administrative fiction of “recent illness.”
• We reject the erasure of medical continuity for bureaucratic convenience.
• We document the inconvenient truth: chronic illness is not emotional misbehaviour.
⟡ This Entry Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every line jurisdictional. Every comma intentional. Every breath accounted for.
Because evidence deserves elegance — and retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Unlicensed reproduction will be cited as panic, not authorship.