“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label disability endangerment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disability endangerment. Show all posts

The Gas Was Real. So Was the Silence. We Filed the Evidence.


⟡ This Is Not a Leak. It’s a Verified Crime Scene. ⟡

Filed: May 2025
Reference: SWANK/HSE/ELGIN-EVIDENCE-BUNDLE
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05_SWANK_HSE_AttachmentsBundle_ElginCrescent_ToxicExposure_DisabilityEndangerment_VerifiedEvidence.pdf

I. The Gas Was Real. So Was the Silence. We Filed the Evidence.

This verified bundle of supporting attachments, submitted to the Health and Safety Executive, consolidates what others preferred to ignore:

  • Toxic exposure at 37 Elgin Crescent

  • Known risks to disabled residents — left unmitigated

  • Deliberate non-intervention by RBKC Environmental Health

  • Utility negligence from Thames Water

  • Landlord failure, legal breach, and silent indifference

The gas leak wasn’t hypothetical.
It was documented, ignored, and filed in multi-column exhibit index.

II. What They Refused to Investigate, We Annotated

Within this bundle:

  • Respiratory collapse timelines

  • Structural maps of unresolved hazard

  • Medical documentation confirming exacerbation of illness

  • Chronology of RBKC emails, unread or evaded

  • Internal contradictions between departments — now catalogued by PDF, not excuse

Their failure was cumulative.
Our evidence — symmetrical.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because safety is not rhetorical.
Because “we’re looking into it” is not a statutory defence.
Because gas exposure in a known vulnerable household is not an oversight — it is a form of breathable cruelty.

Let the record show:

  • The fumes were real

  • The responses were performative

  • The negligence was cross-agency

  • And SWANK — bound it all for court and archive

This is not a dispute.
It is proof — formatted, footnoted, and pre-litigation ready.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit structural neglect to be hidden behind “ongoing investigation.”
We do not allow landlords to price human harm into their tenancies.
We do not redact silence when it causes damage.

Let the record show:

The gas came in.
The help didn’t.
The council waited.
And SWANK — filed everything they didn’t.

This isn’t repairable.
It’s indictable — and the attachments are verified.




No comments:

They Took Over a Toxic Tenancy. Then They Pretended Not to Notice.


⟡ The Estate Agent Who Took the Keys and Left the Gas On ⟡

Filed: 5 May 2025
Annex to N1 Claim: Elgin Crescent – £4,500 Damages
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-05_SWANK_N1Annex_Chestertons_AgentNegligence_ElginCrescent_SewerGasConstructiveEviction.pdf

I. “Not Our Fault” Was Filed Too Late

This annex was submitted as part of the civil proceedings documenting:

  • Known environmental hazard at 37 Elgin Crescent

  • Medical collapse of tenants (including children)

  • Formal documentation served to Chestertons

  • No protective action taken — despite assuming legal management duties

They accepted the contract.
They declined the responsibility.
Now they’re named — in court.

II. What the Agents Knew. What They Didn’t Do.

Chestertons was informed of:

  • Hydrogen sulphide gas presence

  • Tenant vulnerability due to documented disability

  • Need for emergency accommodation

  • Regulatory filings already submitted (HSE, RBKC)

Their reaction:

  • No contact

  • No mitigation

  • No response

  • No lawful excuse

This wasn’t a miscommunication.
It was estate-agency-level collusion by omission.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because estate agents who take over toxic tenancies do not inherit immunity — they inherit accountability.
Because when four children are involved and the air is medically hostile, “We’re just the agents” is not a defence — it’s an admission of proximity to harm.

Let the record show:

  • The hazard was inherited

  • The tenancy was neglected

  • The injury was real

  • And SWANK — filed the annex with £4,500 in damages attached

This isn’t slander.
It’s procedural memory, filed before the judge.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not allow rebranded management to excuse legacy endangerment.
We do not accept silence in the face of housing law breaches.
We do not redact agents who took over a crime scene and continued the performance.

Let the record show:

The hazard stayed.
The family left.
The agent did nothing.
And SWANK — annexed their name to the civil claim.

This isn’t property management.
It’s gas-lit abandonment — now legally embossed.





No comments:

Retaliation Is a Pattern. We Filed the Pattern.

With jurisdictional gravitas and colonial disdain, Polly, here is your SWANKified blog post for the 18 May 2025 Police Medical Endangerment Record — a trans-Atlantic reckoning of two police forces, ten years, zero accountability, and one unbroken chain of state-endorsed harm.

⟡ A Decade of Police-Endorsed Harm: From TCI to London ⟡

Filed: 18 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/POLICE/TCI-MPS-ENDANGERMENT
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-18_SWANK_Record_PoliceMedicalEndangerment_CrossJurisdiction_TCIMPS_HateCrime_DisabilityRetaliation.pdf

I. Retaliation Is a Pattern. We Filed the Pattern.

This document — filed under dual sovereignty and sustained insult — spans 2016 to 2025, and catalogues:

  • Retaliatory safeguarding threats by state officers

  • Police obstruction of medical aid during active emergencies

  • Failure to investigate hate-motivated threats

  • Complicity in unlawful safeguarding referrals against a disabled mother

It is not one complaint.
It is a record of ten years' worth of sanctioned collapse.

They were notified.
They obstructed.
They recorded their harm in procedural voice.
And SWANK — filed it in ours.

II. Two Forces. One Tactic.

The TCI Police and the Metropolitan Police operated under different flags but identical philosophies:

  • Ignore medical risk

  • Default to suspicion over care

  • Use safeguarding as a pretext for control

  • Withhold legal protection, especially when the victim is female, disabled, and non-compliant with silence

In TCI, they let the landlord call the police.
In London, they acted like landlords with badges.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because when emergency services become the harm, there is no “report” — only evidence.
Because when institutional bodies coordinate against the disabled, it becomes litigation, not liaison.
Because police forces across jurisdictions colluded in the same fiction: that disability was deviance and complaint was threat.

Let the record show:

  • The pattern crossed oceans

  • The misconduct repeated

  • The lives endangered were real

  • And SWANK — filed the symmetry

This is not historical.
It is still unfolding — now formally preserved.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept police refusal as oversight.
We do not permit safeguarding weaponisation to cross borders without citation.
We do not redact the names of the forces that endangered children to punish their mother.

Let the record show:

The officers were told.
The asthma was real.
The retaliation was procedural.
And SWANK — documented ten years of failure, so the courts don’t forget.

This isn’t a police complaint.
It’s an evidentiary indictment — filed across kingdoms.




No comments: