“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label Legal Clarification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legal Clarification. Show all posts

In re: SWANK London Ltd. v. Institutional Memory Lapses


🪞 WHEN DOCUMENTATION MAKES YOU SWEAT

🗂️ Metadata

Filed Date: 11 July 2025
Reference Code: SWK-STAT-0711-COURTDISTINCTION
PDF Filename: 2025-07-11_SWANK_Clarification_CourtNotTarget_LocalAuthorityIs.pdf
Summary: Public clarification on the purpose of SWANK London Ltd. — not to surveil the judiciary, but to expose the bureaucracies that forced it into being.

I. The Official Clarification

To whom it may concern — especially those who keep emailing me as if I work for you:

SWANK London Ltd. is not a Court record service.
It is an archive of your professional ineptitude.

The platform exists to document the administrative sloppiness, institutional gaslighting, negligent risk assessments, and retaliatory procedures deployed against disabled families like mine — not to comment on court outcomes.

I trust the Court to do its job.
I do not trust safeguarding professionals who can’t read oxygen charts, ignore medical correspondence, and fabricate thresholds from rumor and revenge.

So, let me help with your comprehension:

If you had done your job properly and responsibly, we wouldn’t have needed to escalate this to the Court.
But because you failed so badly, I’m now thankful the Court has stepped in to address your misconduct.

II. SWANK’s Jurisdictional Note

The archive is public because your failures were public.
The documentation exists because your departments still don’t.

If you wrestled capably, you would not have met SWANK.
Since you did not — we file everything.

We are not here to soothe your embarrassment.
We are here to preserve the record.

Filed by: Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
📍 Flat 37, 2 Porchester Gardens, London W2 6JL
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

You Confused Asthma With Intoxication. I Confused You With a Professional.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 18 February 2024

I AM MORE SOBER THAN MOST OF THE HUMAN POPULATION.

Filed Under: Safeguarding Fabrication, NHS Gaslighting, False Allegations, Legal Clarification, Hospital Harassment, Disability Misinterpretation, Parenting Stigma

📎 SUBJECT: Your Concern Is Fiction. My Footage Is Fact.

To: Samira Issa
CC’d: Eric Wedge-Bull, Glen Peache, NHS Complaints, Three Hospitals, All the Lies You’ve Spread
From: Polly Chromatic

“I am more sober than most of the human population.”

Imagine being accused of intoxication — not because of slurred speech, not because of substance use — but because you have asthma. Because you can’t breathe.

This is not safeguarding.
This is slander in a safeguarding costume.

🧠 POINT ONE:

“I have a respiratory disability and therefore am and always have been very against anything unhealthy including drugs, drinking alcohol, smoking, and eating sugar/carbohydrates.”

This isn’t lifestyle. It’s survival.
You’re accusing a woman who’s medically exempt from verbal conversation of substance use — because she struggled to speak.

🧠 POINT TWO:

“Why would me being intoxicated at the hospital without my children be any cause for concern about my children anyway?”

A logical question. Answer it if you can.
You won’t — because this isn’t about logic.
It’s about control and discrediting.

📜 LEGAL EDUCATION FOR YOU (AGAIN):

Noelle’s children are:
14, 12, 9, and 6.
Per UK law:

  • Parents are permitted to use their judgement.

  • It is not a crime to leave mature children alone.

  • It is not the hospital’s job to invent scenarios that didn’t happen.

🔊 THE EVIDENCE:

🎥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZnrkgymrPg

This is not anecdote.
This is an audio-visual record of hospital misconduct, uploaded and archived —
because emails weren’t enough.

🏥 THE REALITY IN THE ER:

  • Nurses claiming she could breathe — because she spoke

  • Refusal of adequate treatment

  • Accusations of shouting when she was pleading

  • A nebuliser cut short

  • A doctor’s attitude change triggered by misinformation

  • A black doctor denying care, referencing past records written with bias

  • A woman leaving, untreated, breathless — yet again

💥 THE LINGERING TRUTH:

“I’m still very concerned and confused as to why I am being treated this way…”
“I am very sick.”
“I have made five emergency room visits since October 2023 after exposure to sewer fumes.”
“I have still not received appropriate care.”

You don’t need a case conference.
You need a judicial review.

Polly Chromatic
Asthmatic. Documented. Sober. Still being harassed.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, safeguarding abuse, hospital false report, NHS retaliation, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, false intoxication claim, asthma not alcohol, sewer gas aftermath, legal clarity, parenting discrimination, written-only boundary ignored, medical record corruption

No comments: