🪞MASTER RETALIATION TIMELINE
An Annotated Record of Unrepentant Bureaucratic Collapse
In the Matter of Persistent Violations by State, Clinic, and Council
📜 Metadata
Filed: 29 June 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-MRT-0629
Filename: 2025-06-29_SWANK_Timeline_MasterRetaliation_CurrentToPast.pdf
Summary: Full evidentiary chronology of medical discrimination, safeguarding misuse, and institutional retaliation against Polly Chromatic and her children.
I. What Happened
Over the course of nearly a decade, Polly Chromatic, a disabled U.S. citizen and mother of four, was subjected to a coordinated campaign of systemic negligence, retaliatory safeguarding, disability discrimination, and overt procedural abuse. From the early respiratory diagnoses at Royal Brompton to the unlawful seizure of her children in 2025, this timeline captures—meticulously—what the institutions did not.
Every ignored complaint, every falsified report, every safeguarding weapon misused—catalogued.
Every diagnosis doubted, every asthma attack dismissed, every lawful request refused—filed.
Every letter, every visit, every escalation without cause—recorded and timestamped.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
This timeline demonstrates an unbroken chain of harm across medical, educational, and social systems.
It evidences:
Recurrent medical dismissal and racialised disbelief,
Improper use of Child Protection frameworks as tools of reprisal,
Sustained refusal to accommodate disability,
Retaliation triggered by lawful advocacy,
The complete collapse of ethical safeguarding protocols.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because none of them did.
Because every time Polly reported it, they weaponised her voice against her.
Because her children’s diagnoses were met not with services, but suspicion.
Because Westminster and RBKC did not “intervene for safety” — they intervened in retaliation.
Because medical harm was not prevented, it was produced.
Because someone has to write it down.
IV. Violations
Article 3 ECHR – Inhuman and Degrading Treatment
Article 6 ECHR – Denial of Fair Process
Article 8 ECHR – Family Life Interference
Children Act 1989 – Misuse of Section 47 and EPO protocols
Equality Act 2010 – Repeated disability-based discrimination
Data Protection Act 2018 – Failure to uphold written-only adjustments
UNCRC Articles 3, 7, 9, 23 – Rights of the Child (ignored)
V. SWANK’s Position
This is not a case of poor communication. It is a case of structured retaliation by public bodies unable to withstand accountability.
No safeguarding response exists in good faith when the family in question has already documented the harm and is punished for doing so.
The Master Retaliation Timeline remains a live, evidentiary archive.
It is submitted not for sympathy, but for adjudication.
It is preserved not as commentary, but as proof.
And it is published not for virality, but for veracity.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.