“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label Child cruelty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Child cruelty. Show all posts

Chromatic v. Shopna [2025] – On the Illegality of “You Can’t Eat Because You’re 10”


🪞SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue

Filed 5 August 2025

Reference: 2025-08-07_SWANK_Letter_WestminsterFosterer_ShopnaSafeguardingProsecution.pdf
PDF Title: Shopna LOI Official.pdf
1-Line Summary:
A foster carer assigned by Westminster allegedly told a child with asthma he “couldn’t eat because he’s 10.” We responded with a criminal summons.

I. What Happened

Between June and August 2025, a foster carer known only as Shopna, working under contract with Westminster Children’s Services, allegedly subjected multiple American-born children to degrading restrictions, verbal abuse, and disability-based neglect.

Reported violations include:
– Denying a 10-year-old asthmatic child food “because he’s 10”
– Prohibiting children from taking water bottles or drawing materials upstairs
– Mocking U.S. nationality: “You’re from America” (said with derision)
– Emotional suppression through device bans, surveillance, and infantilisation

These abuses were documented in a handwritten journal by Romeo Bonneannee, age 16, and reported to the Metropolitan Police on 2 August 2025 (Ref: TAA-38017-25-0101-IR). The children’s mother, Polly Chromatic, submitted this evidence alongside a formal Laying of Information for a criminal summons.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

This is not simply poor parenting. This is state-sponsored neglect carried out by a foster carer funded by the Local Authority. The formal LOI submitted to Westminster Magistrates’ Court includes the following charges:

  1. Child Cruelty – s.1 Children and Young Persons Act 1933

  2. Disability Neglect – s.15 Equality Act 2010

  3. Neglect of Medically Vulnerable Child

  4. Harassment and Coercive Control – s.76 Serious Crime Act 2015

  5. Suppression of Safeguarding Disclosures – Articles 8 & 12 ECHR

  6. Racially Aggravated Harassment – s.31 Crime and Disorder Act 1998

This isn’t a hypothetical claim. It’s backed by:
– Police filings
– Journal evidence
– Medical documents confirming eosinophilic asthma in all four children
– Reports submitted to the Central Family Court, U.S. Embassy, Social Work England, and international human rights monitors

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because we do not “manage behaviour” by depriving chronically ill children of water and food.
Because “you’re from America” is not an excuse to humiliate or marginalise a child.
Because cruelty disguised as routine must be confronted with law, not leniency.

And because no matter how obscure your surname, if you harm children under Westminster’s protection, we will find your name in court.

IV. Violations

Domestic Law Breaches:
– Children and Young Persons Act 1933
– Equality Act 2010
– Serious Crime Act 2015
– Crime and Disorder Act 1998
– Children Act 1989

Human Rights:
– ECHR Article 3 (Freedom from degrading treatment)
– ECHR Article 8 (Family life and dignity)
– UNCRC Article 12 (Right to be heard)

Safeguarding Framework Violations:
– Foster Placement Oversight
– Disability Accommodations
– Communication Rights

V. SWANK’s Position

We filed this LOI on 7 August 2025 in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court and simultaneously added it to Case No: ZC25C50281 at the Central Family Court.

We will not accept private apologies.
We do not seek corrective training.
We seek criminal prosecution.

Because if a 10-year-old with asthma is told he can’t eat, we will file until justice does.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Chromatic v. Del [2025] – On the Inadmissibility of Starvation as Parenting


🪞SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue

Filed 5 August 2025

Reference: 2025-08-07_SWANK_Letter_WestminsterFosterer_DelNeglectSafeguarding.pdf
PDF Title: Del LOI Official.pdf
1-Line Summary:
A state-paid foster carer reportedly told a 10-year-old child he “can’t eat because he’s 10.” We filed a criminal prosecution.

I. What Happened

Between 23 June and 2 August 2025, a foster carer known only as Del—contracted by Westminster Children’s Services—subjected King Bonneannee (age 10) to a regime of punitive, degrading, and medically negligent restrictions. He was reportedly told he “couldn’t eat because he’s 10,” denied access to water bottles and drawing materials, and humiliated with culturally mocking statements referencing his American identity. These reports emerged in Romeo Bonneannee’s handwritten journal, dated 1 August, and were corroborated by police report TAA-38016-25-0101-IR.

All four children—King, Prince, Romeo, and Honor—were witnesses to this treatment. King, diagnosed with eosinophilic asthma, required consistent hydration, calm routine, and emotional support. Instead, he received deprivation and coercive control under the Local Authority’s supposedly protective arm.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

This is not a "disruption of placement" — it is a criminal prosecution. We have filed an LOI with Westminster Magistrates’ Court alleging:

  • Child Cruelty (s.1 Children and Young Persons Act 1933)

  • Disability Discrimination (s.15 Equality Act 2010)

  • Neglect of Medically Vulnerable Child

  • Harassment and Coercive Control (s.76 Serious Crime Act 2015)

  • Institutional and Cultural Discrimination

  • Suppression of Welfare Disclosures

The filing was supported by:

  • Romeo’s journal

  • Medical documents

  • Police filings

  • Ongoing family court records

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because we do not tolerate hunger-based discipline as a governance model.
Because we do not accept asthma negligence as "behaviour management."
Because no foster carer under state contract should deprive children of food, hydration, or dignity without criminal accountability.
And because nobody—not even someone with an address in Dagenham and a social work referral from Westminster—gets to emotionally harm our children without notice.

IV. Violations

Human Rights:

  • Article 3 (Freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment)

  • Article 8 (Respect for private and family life)

Statutory Law:

  • Children and Young Persons Act 1933

  • Equality Act 2010

  • Children Act 1989 (welfare duties)

  • Serious Crime Act 2015

Procedural Doctrine Breaches:

  • Foster placement approval standards

  • Medical accommodations for known conditions

  • Safe disclosure protocol

V. SWANK’s Position

We filed this LOI on 7 August 2025 with Westminster Magistrates’ Court and simultaneously submitted it to the Central Family Court as part of ongoing litigation in Case No: ZC25C50281. There will be no informal correction. There will be no private warnings. There will be no delay. Del will answer in court.

As always, the Archive remains active.
The Court of Mirror holds its glare.
Let no one think they escape observation.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments: