“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label equality law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label equality law. Show all posts

The Records Were Altered. So We Filed the Metadata.



⟡ SWANK Information Governance Complaint ⟡

“They Falsified the Medical File. Now It’s in the Archive.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/NDG/DATA-RIGHTS/2025-06-02
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_NDGComplaint_HealthDataMisuse_SafeguardingRetaliation_DisabilityBreach.pdf


I. When the Record Is the Weapon, The Complaint Becomes the Metadata

On 2 June 2025, SWANK London Ltd. submitted a formal complaint to the National Data Guardian (NDG) regarding the systemic misuse, erasure, and falsification of health records — across general practice, paediatrics, hospital emergency services, and social work platforms.

This complaint names not just the doctors.
It names the systems they used to disappear diagnosis.

It is not about care.
It is about control.


II. What Was Falsified — and Why It Matters

The complaint documents:

  • Disabling diagnoses deleted from NHS records

  • Allergy and asthma triggers vanished from summaries

  • Written-only adjustments ignored or removed from systems

  • Medical collapse reframed as parental defiance

  • Safeguarding referrals issued based on false medical logs

When truth is administratively inconvenient,
They rewrite the record — and pretend it never existed.

This wasn’t clinical error.
It was informational abuse.


III. Why This Was Filed with the NDG

Because the Caldicott Principles exist for a reason.
Because “integrity” in health records is not symbolic — it’s life-preserving.
Because metadata was misused to fabricate risk.
And because when the file itself is false, every safeguarding action becomes procedural fraud.

This submission functions as:

  • regulatory complaint

  • technical affidavit

  • digital rights filing under the Equality Act and the UK Data Ethics Framework

The screen they read from was already corrupted.
And now the regulators have the log.


IV. SWANK’s Position

We are not confused by polite phrases in doctored records.
We are not mollified by “supportive tone” in weaponised software.

This is not healthcare.
This is administrative gaslighting in .docx format.

Let the record show:

  • We submitted the truth.

  • They altered it.

  • And now we’ve filed their edits — as evidence.

The file is not just a file.
It’s a mechanism of disappearance.
We brought it back. In writing. With receipts.


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.



Documented Obsessions