⟡ Formal Complaint Filed: Equality Act Violations Submitted to EHRC ⟡
“Disability discrimination isn’t a side issue. It’s the pattern. And now it’s in your hands, officially.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/EHRC/EQA-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_EHRC_EqualityActComplaint_DisabilityDiscrimination_RetaliationSimlett.pdf
A formal complaint to the Equality and Human Rights Commission alleging systemic disability discrimination, retaliatory safeguarding misuse, and cross-agency failures by Westminster Children’s Services, RBKC, and NHS actors. Submitted in coordination with legal and regulatory filings across seven jurisdictions.
I. What Happened
On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, writing on behalf of Noelle Jasmine Meline Bonnee Annee Simlett, submitted a formal complaint to the EHRC, outlining:
Disability discrimination through refusal to honour a written-only adjustment
Retaliation for exercising legal rights and protections
The use of safeguarding as a threat, not support
Intersectional harm across gender, disability, race, and parental status
Repeated procedural sabotage by Westminster, RBKC, and Pembridge Villas Surgery
The filing references:
Active complaints with GMC, NHS, LGSCO, ICO, Social Work England, Metropolitan Police, and the IOPC
Live proceedings in the High Court (N461 Judicial Review)
A publicly recorded record via SWANK London Ltd.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That the UK’s equality regulator has been formally placed on notice
That this is not isolated discrimination, but systemic, state-enabled retaliation
That regulatory silence is now a documented part of the record
That this is a test of EHRC's actual function — and of public trust in human rights law
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when rights are denied, the regulator must be named.
Because every filing builds the case not just for justice — but for historical memory.
Because discrimination was the mechanism. Retaliation was the response. And public archiving is the remedy when neither apology nor reform is offered.
This is not a report.
It is a referral.
And if EHRC does not act, this post will stand as proof that they were given the chance.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that equality law applies only when convenient.
We do not accept that retaliation is the cost of self-advocacy.
We do not accept that silence from regulators means the harm wasn’t real.
SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If rights are violated,
We document the violation.
If justice is delayed,
We preserve the delay.
And if equality is denied in writing,
We file that, too — permanently.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.