“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label Romeo Bonneannee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romeo Bonneannee. Show all posts

Chromatic v Westminster: On the Criminal Improvisation of Foster Placements and the Archiving of State Cruelty


💠 SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue 💠

✒️ Filed: 2 August 2025 | Ref Code: WCC-SAFEGUARDING-CRIMINAL-RETALIATION | PDF: 2025-08-02_SWANK_CriminalNotice_FosterAbuseRetaliation.pdf

🔹 Formal Notice of Criminal Child Abuse, Retaliation, and Intent to File Police Report

In the Matter of Westminster’s Foster Placements, Uncorrected Harm, and the Archive of State-Endorsed Cruelty

I. What Happened

On 2 August 2025, Polly Chromatic issued formal notification to Westminster Children’s Services, documenting criminal safeguarding violations committed against her four U.S. citizen children while placed under an Emergency Protection Order obtained through misrepresentation and discrimination.

The notice was sent to:

  • All senior Westminster safeguarding personnel

  • Ofsted, CAFCASS, Social Work England

  • The U.S. Department of State

  • UN Special Rapporteurs on Arbitrary Detention, Torture, and Child Protection

The catalyst: Regal’s handwritten journal, now archived in the SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue, describing a climate of deprivation, humiliation, and emotional suppression inside the foster placement.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Regal’s diary evidences:

  • Food denial to Kingdom (age 10) on the basis of age — institutional starvation

  • Hydration and journaling suppression — pencils and water bottles banned upstairs

  • Guardian manipulation — Regal told the case would last “6 months or more if your mom doesn’t comply”

  • Silencing of sibling affection and emotional support — enforced through carer rules

  • Direct humiliation by carers Del and Shopna — including bike insults and emotional threats

These are not protective boundaries.
These are the curated instruments of state-enabled child abuse.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is no longer about one letter.
This is an entire government department refusing to act on:

  • A child’s handwritten testimony

  • A known injury and emotional breakdown

  • Parental witness accounts corroborated by judicial filings

  • International legal disclosures made on record

Because Westminster has chosen to side with its image, not its obligations.

IV. Violations Cited

  • Children Act 1989 – Section 47 failure

  • ECHR Articles 3, 8, and 14

  • UNCRC Articles 12, 19, 24, 37

  • Equality Act 2010 – disability and nationality discrimination

  • Criminal acts including:

    • Neglect

    • Assault by proxy

    • Psychological abuse

    • Retaliation for protected disclosures

V. SWANK’s Position

We affirm:
This letter is not performative.
It is legal. It is evidentiary. It is future admissible.

The journal entries have been published as a permanent indictment of this local authority’s safeguarding pretence — and as a warning to every institution that chooses containment over care.

Westminster has 48 hours.
After that: court, police, press, and international diplomatic channels activate in full.

The children are watching. So is the world.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Chromatic v Metropolitan Police – On the Failure to Hear a Bleeding Boy


🪞SWANK London Ltd.

The Evidentiary Catalogue of Procedural Abuse

The Bleeding of the Boy – A Mother's Dispatch to a Deaf State

(Re: URGENT Interview Request for Regal – Bloody Knuckles, Journal Distress, and Disability Violations)

🗂 Filed: 3 August 2025

📁 Reference: SWANK-2308-REGAL

📄 PDF: 2025-08-03_SWANK_Letter_MetPolice_RegalInterviewRequest.pdf

📌 Summary: Met Police informed of Regal’s injury, emotional collapse, and institutional abuse. Interview urgently demanded.

I. What Happened

A formal safeguarding escalation was submitted by Polly Chromatic on 3 August 2025, requesting a trauma-informed police interview for her eldest son, Regal (16), following observed injuries and disclosures of distress. Regal, a U.S. citizen and primary sibling protector, discreetly handed his mother a handwritten journal during a court-ordered contact session. The journal described emotional abandonment, disorientation, and isolation. Bloody knuckles were visible.

Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Police placed three unsolicited phone calls to Polly — ignoring not only her documented disability (trauma-induced dysphonia) but also her clearly stated voicemail and written instructions to communicate by email only.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

This is not merely a request for action; it is a declaration of escalation. The evidence submitted includes:

  • Regal’s handwritten journal, expressing despair, fear, and the burden of sibling care.

  • A visible injury (bloody knuckles) noted under supervised contact.

  • Prior police reports naming both carers and social workers as sources of harm.

  • A pattern of discriminatory disregard for the mother’s communication needs — despite disclosure in police reports, voicemail, and email headers.

Polly Chromatic, acting as both legal advocate and archivist of harm, demands formal recognition of Regal's distress and an immediate, uninterrupted, trauma-informed safeguarding interview — free from social worker obstruction.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because a 16-year-old wrote, “no one is there for me,” while his knuckles bled.
Because trauma shouldn’t be editorialised by carers or filtered through institutional PR.
Because the police — already in possession of multiple reports — continue to phone a disabled woman with a medically documented voice disorder.

Because this isn’t safeguarding. It’s state-authored emotional harm.

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010, Section 20 – failure to provide reasonable communication adjustments

  • Section 149, Public Sector Equality Duty – discriminatory service delivery

  • ECHR Article 14 – interference with procedural and disability rights

  • UNCRC Articles 12 & 19 – right of the child to be heard and protected from violence

  • PACE 1984, Code C – requirement for appropriate, independent handling of vulnerable child interviews

V. SWANK’s Position

SWANK London Ltd. asserts that the UK safeguarding system has once again mistaken its own power for a substitute for care. Regal has asked — in writing, in bruises, and in silence — for someone to notice. His journal and his injuries speak louder than the state’s policies.

The Metropolitan Police have 24 hours to respond.
Not to a mother — but to a boy bleeding in plain sight.

All evidence is on record at:
🔗 www.swanklondon.com
(See: Safeguarding Log | Police Reports | Journal Evidence)

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments: