⟡ “I Don’t Fight Like a Wild Animal. I Email Until You Lose Your Job.” ⟡
Medical Neglect, Hospital Misconduct, and the Anatomy of Verbal Retaliation When You Can’t Breathe
Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Reid_NHSMisconduct_ChildNeglectThreatReport.pdf
Email documenting abusive NHS conduct toward disabled parent and children, failed A&E procedures, and verbal disability assertion — with a formal threat to escalate publicly and legally.
I. What Happened
On 23 November 2024, Polly Chromatic sent a structured, blistering email to GP Philip Reid and a group of social services and legal recipients. It contained:
Dosage and health updates for multiple children (prednisone use)
Observations about neglectful NHS staff who mishandled intake tests
First-hand documentation of emotional and physical abuse in A&E settings
A written refusal to continue tolerating hospital-based maltreatment
When King’s lungs were visibly struggling, the staff told him to “breathe with his mouth closed,” and took his temperature by placing the device beside — not in — his ear.
And when Polly complained, they accused her of racism.
This was not a meltdown. It was a case file.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Repeated NHS neglect of a disabled parent and her children
Mistreatment framed as clinical policy, not bias
Weaponised accusations (racism, non-compliance) used to deflect accountability
Disability dismissal: severe asthma and verbal impairment treated as irritants
Verbal retaliation criminalised, while institutional abuse remained protected
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because what gets called an “angry email” is often a legal archive in its purest form.
This message is strategic, evidentiary, and fully aware of the consequences. It does not plead — it indicts. Every sentence is an affidavit in disguise. Every word is a rebuttal to the fantasy that “reasonable” patients get treated fairly.
SWANK logged it because no parent should have to diagnose their own child while defending their legal right not to suffocate in silence.
IV. SWANK’s Position
This was not aggression.
It was survival, forwarded.
We do not accept that hospitals can fail four children and then ask for politeness.
We do not accept that accusations of racism erase acts of clinical cruelty.
We will document every time a parent was forced to write their own discharge summary because the state refused to care.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.