“Nine Adults in a Semi-Circle is Not a Medical Exam — It’s an Inquisition”
⟡ A Formal Complaint Detailing the Forced Genital Examination of Children, Bureaucratic Amnesia, and a Mother’s Surgical Memory
IN THE MATTER OF: Medical assault, safeguarding theatre, and four traumatized children subjected to state-sponsored humiliation
⟡ METADATA
Filed: 8 November 2020
Reference Code: SWANK-TCI-COCKBURN-INTERHEALTH-MEDMALPRACTICE
Court File Name: 2020-11-08_Court_Complaint_CockburnMedical_InterHealth_MedicalMisconduct
Summary: In this devastatingly detailed complaint, Polly Chromatic (then Noelle Bonneannée) recounts how the Department of Social Development forced her and her children into a Cockburn Town hospital room where, on 25 May 2017, a group of nine adults surrounded her sons during a non-consensual genital examination conducted by Dr. Antrieve Benjamin. The complaint also exposes InterHealth Canada’s failure to provide records from a 2019 visit, falsified immunisation claims, and the deeply unethical practice of asking a mother to “recreate” her children’s traumaso a doctor could retroactively type up her own medical report — three years later.
I. What Happened
On 25 May 2017, Polly was forcibly escorted — with her mother and four children — to Cockburn Town Medical Centre by social workers and police.
Her sons, aged 8, 5, and 3, were subjected to genital exams without consent or privacy, with nine adults seated around them “as if it was some kind of show.”
Her 8-year-old was physically violated and deeply traumatised, with the doctor forcibly retracting his foreskin.
The 5-year-old refused to be touched, while the 3-year-old was likewise subjected to this invasive exam.
Her infant daughter was not examined at all, revealing the inconsistency of the abuse claim.
In 2020, when Polly requested the records, she was told they didn’t exist. She had to wait four hours while Dr. Benjamin wrote them up from memory — and asked Polly what had happened to include in the report.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That no consent was sought, and no privacy was provided — thus constituting medical assault
That records were missing or fabricated after the fact, showing administrative misconduct
That Polly was wrongly accused of not vaccinating her children, despite presenting verified immunisation records from three countries
That the 2017 and 2019 visits were both triggered by fabricated safeguarding reports, and compounded by malpractice, trauma, and gaslighting
That the Ministry of Health refused to release records — violating both data protection and patient rights
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because the retraction of a child’s foreskin in a room full of officers is not a safeguarding measure — it’s a civil rights violation. Because mothers shouldn’t have to fund, correct, and deliver their own medical records to receive justice. Because safeguarding should not be a euphemism for humiliation. And because this complaint is a landmark indictment of a system that forgot what consent, protection, and ethics mean.
IV. Violations
Medical assault on minors
Violation of privacy and bodily autonomy
Refusal to release medical records (2019 incident)
Administrative negligence and record falsification
False immunisation allegations
Retaliatory safeguarding escalation
Forced participation under duress
V. SWANK’s Position
We log this complaint as Exhibit K in the archive of medical retaliation, record falsification, and systemic indifference to children’s dignity. SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
That nine adults surrounding naked children is not protection — it is state abuse
That demanding payment for after-the-fact medical reports is extortionate
That InterHealth Canada owes not just compensation but accountability
That safeguarding begins with consent — and ends when it’s replaced by coercion
That no mother should have to write the report the doctor should have written three years ago