“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label chronology of harm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chronology of harm. Show all posts

Filed in Ink. Written in Retaliation. Archived in Public.


⟡ “Chronology of Harm, Addendum of Shame.” ⟡

This addendum provides the condensed timeline of retaliatory safeguarding, disability discrimination, and communication obstruction, naming specific staff and filing it as legal evidence.

Filed: 18 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/RBKC-WCC/CHRONOLOGY-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-18_SWANK_MasterAddendum_RBKC_Westminster_AbuseChronology.pdf
This document is filed alongside the Master Abuse Record and forms part of both the N1 civil claim and judicial review.

I. What Happened

Between December 2023 and May 2024, Polly Chromatic faced:

  • False safeguarding referrals

  • Retaliation for medical complaints

  • Written objections to unlawful procedures

  • Escalations by professionals who ignored medical disability

  • Chronic violation of Equality Act adjustments and ECHR protections

II. What the Addendum Establishes

  • That specific individuals (Issa, Kendall, Hornal, Peache, Gabby) engaged in provable misconduct

  • That objections were made in writing and ignored

  • That legal rights were bypassed under the guise of “child protection”

  • That this file is intended for regulators, international protections, and active litigation

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because memory can be contested — but chronology cannot.
Because they escalated while she was medically incapacitated.
Because this record doesn’t just speak — it testifies.

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Sections 20 & 26: Adjustment refusal and disability-based harassment

  • Working Together 2018 – Misuse of safeguarding process

  • ECHR Articles 3 & 8 – Cruel, degrading treatment and family interference

  • GDPR Articles 5 & 16 – Factual inaccuracy and misuse of data

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Ignoring disability risk in social care escalation

V. SWANK’s Position

This is the addendum they hoped wouldn’t exist.
A clear, sealed file naming them all.
No email they send now can undo this record.

And no denial can erase the date it was filed.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Documented Obsessions