“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label PLO Cooperation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PLO Cooperation. Show all posts

You Can’t Say She Refused to Cooperate — When the Police Got a Copy.


⟡ They Asked for Cooperation — So She Sent It to the Police. ⟡
Because when social workers pretend you’re uncooperative, you cc the entire criminal justice system.

Filed: 20 April 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2025-04-20_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_PLOCooperationStatement_DistributionToPolice.pdf
A formal email issuing the parent’s signed Statement of Cooperation under PLO, distributed to multiple institutions — including police, education professionals, and local council staff — to expose the falsity of non-compliance narratives.

I. What Happened

The mother submitted a full Statement of Cooperation during PLO proceedings.
But instead of acknowledging her lawful compliance, Westminster weaponised silence and spun it into defiance.
So she sent it again.
This time to the police.
To the education professionals.
To the council.
Everyone who needed to know — and everyone who might one day lie.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That the parent complied formally and promptly with PLO requirements

  • That Westminster received the cooperation but continued procedural escalation

  • That the cooperation was visible, documented, and sent to law enforcement to prevent narrative manipulation

  • That safeguarding professionals were notified, and no correction followed

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because when they say you “refused to engage,” this email stands in their way.
Because documentation isn’t drama — it’s defence.
And because truth doesn’t travel in private inboxes. It travels with read receipts and police copy-ins.

IV. Violations Identified

  • Institutional Misrepresentation of Parental Cooperation

  • Procedural Gaslighting During PLO

  • Suppression of Submitted Evidence

  • Safeguarding Narrative Tampering

  • Disregard for Formal Statements Issued in Good Faith

V. SWANK’s Position

This isn’t just an email — it’s insurance.
The parent fulfilled her legal obligations. Westminster ignored them to preserve their own authority.
So she widened the audience.
Now if they lie, they’re not just lying to her — they’re lying to the Metropolitan Police.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

Documented Obsessions