⟡ “They Called It Care. They Used It As Evidence.” ⟡
Formal Complaint to the National Data Guardian: Medical Records Were Misused to Justify Retaliation, Not Treatment
Filed: 31 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/NHS-DATA/EMAIL-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-31_SWANK_Email_NationalDataGuardian_MedicalRecordMisuseAcrossNHS.pdf
Summary: Complaint alleging systemic misuse of medical records by multiple NHS bodies and social services to justify safeguarding action, in breach of data ethics and written communication rights.
I. What Happened
On 31 May 2025, Noelle Bonnee Annee Simlett (Polly Chromatic) submitted a formal complaint to the National Data Guardian. The complaint outlines how multiple NHS bodies — including Pembridge Villas Surgery, Chelsea & Westminster, Guy’s & St Thomas’, and Westminster Children’s Services — misused or failed to correct personal medical records.
The key allegations:
– False or misleading data was used to justify coercive safeguarding
– Written-only communication adjustments were ignored
– Records were not updated despite formal correction requests
– These errors directly impacted care, safety, and dignity
II. What the Complaint Establishes
• NHS and social services violated Caldicott Principles 4, 6, and 7 — data accuracy, justified use, and duty to prevent harm
• Medical records became tools of administrative control and institutional gaslighting
• Disabling health conditions were turned into safeguarding triggers
• Correction requests were treated as non-events, giving institutions plausible deniability
• The NHS’s record-handling system functioned as a weapon, not a safeguard
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because this isn’t a documentation error — it’s a structural failure that collapses trust, care, and consent.
Because written-only medical requests are not “preferences” — they are lifelines.
Because recordkeeping isn’t neutral when what gets recorded is what gets used against you.
SWANK logs the misuse of records not just as negligence — but as narrative control.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that records can be manipulated to justify coercive state involvement.
We do not accept that falsehoods can outlive formal correction.
We do not accept that any medical record system — NHS or otherwise — can ignore certified disability adjustments.
This wasn’t a data breach. This was a data weaponisation.
And SWANK will archive every document they hoped would be forgotten behind a firewall.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.