Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): Communication Breakdown

Showing posts with label Communication Breakdown. Show all posts

When Emails Are Sent Into the Void, and No One Reads.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 15 December 2024
“I’m Tired of Being Ignored—So I’m Done Trying to Reach You”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Email Neglect · Disability Accommodation Failure · Institutional Apathy · Lawyer Inattention · Communication Breakdown · SWANK Final Notice

📩 A Message Lost in the Ether

“I’ve sent many emails to Laura which have been ignored also such as this one…”
“I can’t talk, so I want these people to leave me alone now.”
“They ignored my emails for months.”
“Even my own lawyers aren’t paying attention. It’s sick and evil.”

Ignored requests. Invalidated access needs. Exhausted time and effort.
This is not neglect. This is a pattern.

🧠 A Clear Statement of Needs

“Please Note: I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

You cannot claim ignorance when the access requirement is printed at the bottom of every single email.

🚫 Final Notice

“I really don’t want anything to do with anyone cuz it’s too hard to communicate.”

This isn’t avoidance. It’s exhaustion.
When no one listens, silence becomes protection.

📍 Formally Withdrawn by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Ignored Messages Logged.

I Can’t Tolerate Those Who Refuse to Listen.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 15 December 2024
“Stop Wasting My Time—Read the Email or Leave Me Alone”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Communication Breakdown · Verbal Disability · Email Disregard · Access Needs Ignored · Time Wasting · SWANK Boundary Enforcement

📩 A Message I’ve Sent Before—Still Ignored

“I can’t have anyone in my life who can’t read emails and understand they are for information, to help understand the problem.”
“If someone doesn’t want to understand, then they should leave me alone.”

Information withheld is harm. Misunderstanding isn’t neutral—it’s negligence.

🧠 The Core of the Issue

“People like Simon or the psychiatrist waste my time complaining about how I communicate.”
“I’m tired of that.”

Communication access is not up for review. It’s a boundary backed by law.

📎 Reminder of Access Needs

“Please Note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only.”

This isn’t preference—it’s protocol. And every violation is archived.

📍 Formally Reiterated by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Communications Governed by Law.

If You Won’t Read, Don’t Expect Me to Speak.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 15 December 2024

I’M NOT AVOIDING YOU. I’M AVOIDING COLLAPSE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic

Filed Under: Vocal Disability, Email Neglect, Sewer Gas Illness, Communication Breakdown, Silent Collapse, Relational Fatigue, Misunderstood Accommodation

To: Kirsty Hornal
CC: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara
Bcc: Those who read with care

Let me rephrase this for the bureaucratic imagination:
When I don’t speak, it’s not avoidance. It’s exhaustion.
When I don’t respond, it’s not neglect. It’s survival.

💬 DIRECT QUOTES FOR YOUR RECORD:

“It’s always been hard for me to talk due to asthma but recently my asthma is worse due to sewer gas poisoning and now I can barely talk and it’s getting worse because people keep trying to make me talk and won’t read my emails.”
“Calls are so hard for me for many reasons but mainly the talking issue.”
“I’m traumatised by people emailing me and then abandoning me like Simon and the psychiatrist did.”
“I’m afraid to read emails from people who haven’t read any of mine.”
“It’s evil.”

“I lose my voice after five minutes unless there’s a lot of gaps.”
“It’s exhausting and causes pain. My breathing decreases. Then I can’t talk to my kids.”

🧠 WHAT THIS MEANS:

I speak in writing because speaking aloud harms me.
I rest before and after any vocal interaction.
I have telepathic preferences, but for now, email will suffice.
I ask to be read, not judged.
I ask to be understood, not pathologised.

🗂️ AND YET:

The system escalates because I can’t talk.
The people I ask for help ignore my writing.
The ones who listen don’t act.
The ones who act don’t understand.

So the cycle feeds itself—until my voice breaks and my lungs give up.

📎 LET THIS BE PERMANENTLY FILED:

I am happy to communicate.
I am not able to perform communication on demand.
If you won’t read what I’ve written, you forfeit the right to ask why I’m silent.

Polly Chromatic
Documented. Disabled. Disillusioned by neglect.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com

Labels: Kirsty Hornal, email refusal, speech disability, sewer gas injury, asthma collapse, ignored communication, telepathic humour, Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage, vocal rest, institutional neglect, snobby, read-before-you-ask, breathing not speaking, parental priority

The Year They Didn’t Answer: And the Email That Stopped Playing Along

⟡ “I’m Not Responding to Emails Since No One Responded to Mine for a Full Year” ⟡
A Documented Silence That Became Policy — and Proof of Why Disabled Withdrawal Is Not Consent

Filed: 13 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-13_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_Withdrawal_DisabilityNeglectChain.pdf
Forwarded email confirming social worker no-show, followed by withdrawal of communication due to institutional silence. Sent to legal, medical, and social services professionals.

I. What Happened

On 13 January 2025, Polly Chromatic re-sent her earlier “no-show” notification — this time attaching a declaration of procedural withdrawal. She stated she would no longer be responding to emails due to a year of being ignored.

This was not sent in isolation. The recipients included:

Legal representative Laura Savage
Social worker Kirsty Hornal
NHS GP Philip Reid
Solicitor Simon O’Meara

The message was factual, non-theatrical, and strategically precise: she was not refusing support — she was refusing to perform availability for people who never answered.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Written withdrawal of consent for participation in a non-reciprocal system
Disability neglect framed as ongoing (not situational)
Cross-agency nonresponse as trauma catalyst
Failure to acknowledge distress even after medical escalation
State-of-health update deliberately ignored by those charged with monitoring welfare

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because silence from a disabled person is often treated as compliance — especially when it's been provoked by a year of professional indifference.

This email is the textual equivalent of a door closing in slow motion. Not because of defiance, but because of exhaustion.

SWANK logs it as proof that disabled withdrawal is often misrepresented as disengagement, when it is in fact a boundary — one shaped by recordable abandonment.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This was not non-engagement. It was legal trauma management.

We do not accept that silence, when caused by institutional apathy, voids a person’s rights.
We do not accept that failing to respond for twelve months qualifies professionals to claim “unreachable.”
We will document every refusal that began as a plea — and every professional silence that sculpted retreat into recordable harm.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

The Email That Dared to Be Right: Why Systems Collapse When Language Doesn’t Flatter

⟡ The Immaturity of the Employees Involved ⟡

A Complaint That Was Too Accurate to Be Answered — So It Was Ignored

Filed: 2 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-02_SWANK_Email_WCC_Reid_CommunicationBreakdownComplaint.pdf
Direct complaint from Polly Chromatic to Westminster and NHS officials, citing group immaturity, blame deflection, and verbal disability, submitted amid communication collapse.

I. What Happened

On 15 October 2024, Polly Chromatic sent a sharply-worded but medically grounded email to Westminster Children’s Services — including Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena — as well as NHS clinician Philip Reid.

The email identified a breakdown in communication stemming from professional immaturity, blame redirection, and disregard for disability accommodations. She wrote that verbal interaction was medically unsafe and reaffirmed a written-only communication boundary.

The tone was cutting. The facts were clean. The response was: nothing. No accommodation, no apology, no correction.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Medical adjustment requests were issued in plain language, to named officials
Staff misbehaviour was identified as a source of systemic failure
The NHS and local authority were jointly informed and took no remedial steps
Disability disclosures were dismissed as tone rather than treated as law
Blame-shifting was called out — and instead of reform, they retaliated

III. Why SWANK Logged It

This email is not merely early-stage correspondence. It is the tone that triggered a system-wide panic.

It revealed a truth no policy document could hide: that safeguarding mechanisms were staffed by those unfit to recognise injury, incapable of professional humility, and allergic to directness.

SWANK logs it because it shows the moment the system chose retaliation over reflection. It shows what happens when truth is written too clearly to be misfiled.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This was not a communication breakdown.
It was a jurisdictional embarrassment, ignored to preserve ego.

We do not accept that blunt honesty voids legal validity.
We do not accept that calling something “demented” makes the medical notice disappear.
We will document every unacknowledged truth — especially the ones that stung too much to answer.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

When Emails Are Sent Into the Void, and No One Reads.

📩 A Message Lost in the Ether

🧠 A Clear Statement of Needs

🚫 Final Notice

I Can’t Tolerate Those Who Refuse to Listen.

📩 A Message I’ve Sent Before—Still Ignored

🧠 The Core of the Issue

📎 Reminder of Access Needs

If You Won’t Read, Don’t Expect Me to Speak.

💬 DIRECT QUOTES FOR YOUR RECORD:

🧠 WHAT THIS MEANS:

🗂️ AND YET:

📎 LET THIS BE PERMANENTLY FILED:

The Year They Didn’t Answer: And the Email That Stopped Playing Along

I. What Happened

II. What the Complaint Establishes

III. Why SWANK Logged It

IV. SWANK’s Position

The Email That Dared to Be Right: Why Systems Collapse When Language Doesn’t Flatter

⟡ The Immaturity of the Employees Involved ⟡

I. What Happened

II. What the Complaint Establishes

III. Why SWANK Logged It

IV. SWANK’s Position

Documented Obsessions