“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label COVID violation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label COVID violation. Show all posts

Chromatic v Adams – On the Illegality of Interrupting Education to Prove You Don’t Understand It



 “I Was Trying to Serve Lunch, Not an Uplift Programme.”

⟡ A Letter of Graceful Fury and Legislative Footnotes

IN THE MATTER OF: Domestic Sovereignty, Pandemic Protocols, and the Absolute Madness of Interrupting a Hugelkultur Lesson


⟡ METADATA

Filed: 2 April 2020
Reference Code: SWANK-TCI-ENV-COVID-MATERNAL
Court File Name: 2020-04-02_Records_ComplaintAshleyAdamsGrandTurk
Summary: A 6,000-word, policy-citing, diplomatically seething complaint to the Director of Social Development in Turks and Caicos Islands, authored by a mother, scholar, and environmentalist who had the gall to homeschool, compost, and obey pandemic laws — only to be met with masked confusion and bureaucratic disruption.


I. What Happened

During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, social workers entered the family’s home without lawful urgency, pandemic protection, or sufficient notice — thereby violating emergency public health laws. In response, Polly Chromatic (then known as Noelle Bonneannée) issued an encyclopedic takedown: citing UN treaties, local ordinances, agricultural policy, and neuroscience — all while apologizing for mixing up names and burning lunch.


II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That the local authority violated the Emergency Powers (COVID-19) Regulations

  • That two social workers entered a household during a declared curfew without lawful cause

  • That the complainant had more legal, medical, and ecological literacy than the entire department combined

  • That consistent interruptions of learning, meals, and rest are not safeguarding

  • That the director of Social Development received a masterclass in their own failure to embody their mission statement


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because nothing screams “accountability” like a calm, evidence-based, policy-laden letter written by a woman who simultaneously runs a homeschool, an organic garden, a literary archive, and a child protection dossier. Because this letter is a Rosetta Stone of everything wrong with institutional arrogance — and everything right about mothers who read.


IV. Violations

  • Pandemic protocol breach (Emergency Powers, 2020)

  • Disruption of lawful home education

  • Failure to provide notice, clarity, or written assessment reports (Children Ordinance, 2015)

  • Cultural and pedagogical discrimination against homeschooling families

  • Lack of basic respect for maternal intelligence, environmental education, and lunchtime


V. SWANK’s Position

SWANK London Ltd. recognises this letter as a definitive archive artifact — one that combines legal citation, maternal dignity, and bureaucratic autopsy. We file it as irrefutable evidence that:

  • Competence is not a uniform or a title; it is behaviour

  • Compliance with law is not optional when it’s inconvenient

  • Interrupting a lesson on Hugelkultur to “check in” is not oversight — it is underthinking

  • Mothers like Polly Chromatic don’t just raise children — they raise the bar


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

3.5 Years of Evidence They Never Wanted to See

 📚 SWANK Dispatch: The Timeline They Ignored

🗓️ 14 July 2020

Filed Under: institutional gaslighting, timeline of abuse, report withholding, homeschool approval ignored, sexual misconduct, illegal entry, pandemic violations, educational interference, maternal advocacy


“I don’t need to try so hard to prove myself?”
Then why have I been investigated non-stop, forced to submit income, degrees, and curriculum — and never once received a report?”

— A Mother with a Timeline. And a Law Degree’s Worth of Patience.


This 9-page, legislatively cited timeline is Noelle Bonneannée’s final attempt to turn relentless surveillance into lawful accountability.

Addressed to Ashley Adams-Forbes, it chronicles every visit, violation, retaliation, and lie from November 2016 to July 2020, culminating in a letter that could easily double as a legal brief.


🗂️ I. This Is Not a Case. This Is a Siege.

  • 2017: Her boys were sexually assaulted by a doctor during a forced exam

  • 2017–2020: Harassed despite confirmed homeschool approval

  • 2019: Social workers dismantled her fence to illegally enter

  • 2020: Entered her home during lockdown against COVID emergency powers

  • 2020: Despite requests, no report has ever been provided

“I should be innocent until proven guilty.”
“Instead, I have been treated as guilty without cause — and without explanation.”


🧑‍🏫 II. She Homeschools. They Pretend Not to Know.

From Mark Garland’s confirmation to repeated curriculum submissions, every legal step was followed.

• Homeschool curriculum sent in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
• Degrees provided upon request
• Proof of income supplied
• Truancy officers still appeared
• Social workers still interrogated her
• The Department still failed to update its records or close its case


💥 III. The Department’s Greatest Hits (of Lawbreaking)

  • Defacing property

  • Threats from neighbours ignored

  • Fence destruction

  • Medical abuse

  • Pandemic violation

  • Harassment during grocery trips

  • Institutional gaslighting

  • No legal closure


✍️ IV. Her Questions Deserve Answers

  1. What is the purpose of each case?

  2. What is the solution?

  3. How can we move on with our lives?

The Department offers no answers — only more surveillance.