“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label SAR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SAR. Show all posts

SAR Filed. Adjustments Declared. Now You Have 30 Days.


⟡ SWANK Data Rights Archive ⟡

“I Didn’t Ask for My Rights. I Asserted Them in Writing.”
Filed: 15 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/NHS/SAR/STTHOMAS/FAMILY-DATA
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-15_SWANK_SAR_StThomas_Hospital_FamilyDataRequest_DisabilityAdjustmentAsserted.pdf

I. This Was Not a Request. It Was a Formal Declaration.

On 15 May 2025, SWANK London Ltd. filed a Subject Access Request (SAR) to Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust — not in search of kindness, but in assertion of law.

It was not written emotionally.

It was written in statute, in clinical citation, and with the weight of five lives attached.

This letter demands:

  • All personal data relating to the Director and her four children

  • All safeguarding records, professional correspondence, and redacted insults

  • All decisions made without consent, but in her name

II. What the SAR Declares

  • The written-only communication adjustment is not negotiable

  • The hospital’s failures to respect this adjustment amount to:

    • Disability discrimination (Equality Act 2010)

    • Procedural retaliation

    • Obstruction of subject access rights (UK GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018)

  • The letter anchors its legal weight in:

    • Article 8 (Right to Private Life)

    • Article 6 (Right to Fair Process)

    • Clinical evidence: Dr. Irfan Raaiq’s written-only adjustment, November 2024

This wasn’t “just” a SAR.

It was a document of dominion over data, medical record, and narrative integrity.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because we’ve had enough of:

  • Phone calls disguised as policy

  • Verbal access gatekept by kindness

  • Data locked in filing systems that respond only to tone, not law

We filed it because:

  • Your voice isn’t the price of your rights

  • Written-only is not unusual — it’s strategic and documented

  • Medical trauma is not a reason to exclude someone from their own file

Let the record show:

The SAR was sent.
The rights were cited.
The tone was firm.
And the archive — now contains the proof.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not wait for data to be “found.”
We demand it — legally, formally, and in writing.

We do not beg for respect.
We assert the law, the diagnosis, and the authority of our own archive.

Let the record show:

The SAR was filed under UK GDPR.
The deadline now ticks.
And the NHS has no excuse left but silence — or compliance.

This wasn’t a request.
It was a documented refusal to be erased.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions