“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Home Education Bias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Home Education Bias. Show all posts

Eric and Jess Came Over. They Saw Ballet Shoes and Boxes. They Wrote a Book About Trauma (And Invented a Urine Bin).


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 12 July 2023
WE WERE NEVER ASSESSED. WE WERE OBSERVED AND JUDGED.
Also Titled: “Eric and Jess Came Over. They Saw Ballet Shoes and Boxes. They Wrote a Book About Trauma (And Invented a Urine Bin).”

Filed Under: Social Worker Surveillance, Narrative Fabrication, Health Disregard, Observation Bias, Fictional Evidence, RBKC Gaslighting, Legal Pre-Lit

🏷️ Subject: RBKC Initial Contact

Conducted by: Eric Wedge-Bull & Jessica Miller
Sanctioned by: Robert Young, Gatekeeper of the Imaginary

🧾 Allegation:

“We received a police report… cannabis… shouting… a bin filled with urine…”

🧻 Let’s pause here:

THERE WAS NO URINE BIN.

None.
Not present.
Not visible.
Not documented by anyone who attended the home.

But it made its way into the official record — because social work, in this case, prefers the literary genre of fictional hygiene horror over actual observation.

🎭 What Was Actually Observed:

  • A family preparing for a move

  • Boxes — naturally.

  • Children: articulate, engaged, joyful

  • No cannabis

  • No signs of neglect

  • No distress

  • No “urine bin”

  • Just a chronically ill mother doing her best while stalked by bureaucratic nonsense

👩‍👧‍👦 The Children:

  • Described their mum as loving, warm, supportive

  • Shared stories of ballet, gymnastics, coding, gardening, play

  • One child said: “Mummy does everything for us.”

  • Another said: “We hug her when she’s sad.”

No fear. No confusion. Just familial tenderness.
Which, of course, the system mistrusts.

📚 The Narrative Pivot:

“Three police referrals…”
“She gets angry…”
“There might be trauma…”
“She should probably get therapy…”
“And — again — there was allegedly a urine bin…”

Because when abuse can’t be found, the state will reach for metaphor.

🧠 Let Us Be Very Clear:

This was not an “assessment.”
It was speculative surveillance disguised as support.

And where truth didn’t cooperate, fiction filled the gaps.

🧾 Conclusion:

  • No cannabis use by the mother

  • No risk to the children

  • No urine bin — just a lie printed in a PDF

  • No distress — except the kind caused by being repeatedly watched, questioned, and gaslit by the very agencies assigned to “help”

Noelle Meline
Diagnosed. Documented. Defamed. Still standing.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, SWANK tribunal, fictional evidence, made-up urine bin, Eric Wedge-Bull, Jessica Miller, RBKC misconduct, asthma ignored, trauma spectacle, home education bias, narrative distortion, legal escalation pending

No comments:

They Called It Safeguarding. I Called It a Story Without a Plot.


SWANK Response Ledger

I Raised Polite Children. They Raised Undefined Allegations.

Filed: February 2024

Labels: Safeguarding Retaliation, Projection Without Evidence, Medical Misdiagnosis, Home Education Bias, Hospital Trauma Rewritten, Chronology Without Substance

🕊 WELCOME TO SWANK
An Archive of ✦ Elegance, ✦ Complaint, ✦ and Unapologetic Standards
from a Mother Harassed by the State in Two Countries for Over a Decade.

✦ My Official Response

“There have been several previous checks with boroughs which have not highlighted concerns with my children or parenting.”

This is not my first inspection.
It’s simply the first one that’s decided to perform concern as theatre.

“It is evident that I have well-rounded and emotionally secure children who have strong relationships with each other and, in your words, are ‘polite and respectful.’”

Their own words.
Yet still they question the parenting behind it.
One might ask—what result would satisfy them?

✦ On Mobility and Medical Needs

“My children are home schooled... movement and disruption are minimal.”
“They have GPs and dentists... their welfare is intact.”

This isn’t chaos.
It’s curated flexibility.
I manage multiple transitions with foresight and structure.
They misread autonomy as risk.

“I was told at St Thomas’ on 2 January 2024 that I could not be treated with Honor present.”

This was a fabricated barrier.
On that same day, police checked in—and found no concerns.
But safeguarding scripts don’t need evidence—just tone.

“On 3 February I left the children at home to avoid trauma. There is no legal age limit... I used sound parental judgement.”

When I brought a child, I was criticised.
When I didn’t, I was investigated.

The issue was never the children.
It was the mother’s right to decide.

✦ The False Narrative of Intoxication

“The initial report following 3 February was a belief that I was intoxicated... which was false.”

It wasn’t confusion.
It was punishment for illness.
They couldn’t understand the symptoms, so they invented a story.
I’ve now submitted a medical letter from my specialist confirming the diagnosis.

✦ The Vagueness of Blame

“What is the dysregulated behaviour? What was the racial abuse? There are no real details.”

Exactly.
Because there were none.
Because vague allegations are the most durable.
They stick—just enough to shadow you, but never enough to refute directly.

✦ Final Word

If there’s no evidence of harm—
only speculation and performance—
then this isn’t protection.
It’s punishment for having clarity, composure, and a vocabulary that outpaces theirs.

Filed under: Unclear Allegations as Policy, Medical Illness Treated as Threat, Safeguarding Performed, Not Practised, No Detail = No Accountability


No comments:

They Called My Parenting Erratic. I Called Their Allegations Empty.


SWANK Conference Rebuttal

You Called It Concern. I Called It a Pattern of Institutional Projection.

Filed: February 2024

Labels: Safeguarding Retaliation, Medical Disinformation, Police as Spectacle, Home Education Bias, Motherhood Judged by Movement, Racial Vagueness, Chronology of Coherence

✶ WELCOME TO SWANK ✶
An Archive of ✦ Elegance, ✦ Complaint, ✦ and Unapologetic Standards
from a Mother Harassed by the State in Two Countries for Over a Decade.

✦ My Comments, Unabridged

“There have been several previous checks with boroughs which have not highlighted concerns with my children or parenting.”

This isn’t my first encounter with institutional paranoia.
And it won’t be the last.
But let the record show: none of them found fault.

“It is evident that I have well-rounded and emotionally secure children who have strong relationships with each other and, in your words, are ‘polite and respectful.’”

Their words, not mine.
Even the state’s mouth slips occasionally and says something true.

✦ On Home Education and Movement

“My children are home schooled… the effect of movement on them and disruption as a consequence is minimal.”

“They have GPs and dentists… so again, the moving has little impact on their welfare.”

Their assumptions rely on school as social anchoring.
I rely on actual stability: family, learning, structure.
A mobile life does not equal chaos—especially when every detail is managed with precision.

✦ The Hospital Incidents

“On 2 January 2024, I was told at St Thomas’ Hospital I could not be treated with Honor present. The police check later that day raised no concerns.”

“On 3 February, I chose to leave the children at home—avoiding hospital trauma altogether.”

And yet, both decisions—opposite in strategy—were framed as risky.
The only thing consistent here is the state’s obsession with surveillance, not child safety.

“There is no legal age limit for leaving children alone. Maturity—generally 12+—is the benchmark. My decision was grounded in sound parental judgement.”

Exactly.
The law respects judgement.
But the state punishes mothers for exercising it.

✦ Medical Misconduct and Racial Gaslight

“The initial report following 3 February was a belief that I was intoxicated, which was false. I have produced a specialist letter confirming my diagnosis.”

When truth threatens their narrative, they retreat to innuendo.
When that fails, they pivot to unsubstantiated allegations.

“What is the dysregulated behaviour? What was the racial abuse? There are no real details, and this needs to be expanded upon.”

And there it is.
They deploy language like ‘dysregulated’ or ‘racial abuse’ without evidence, without clarity—
because ambiguity is their power play.
Because specificity would expose the hollowness of the claim.

✦ Final Word

You want to track my decisions?
Start by tracking your own.
The pattern is this:
• When I speak clearly, you call it dysregulation.
• When I protect my health, you call it evasion.
• When I name abuse, you call it accusation.
• And when I ask for detail, you offer none.

Filed under: Conference Rebuttals, Safeguarding as Spectacle, Motherhood Mislabelled, Medical Weaponisation, No Allegation, Only Accusation


No comments:

Documented Obsessions