“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Eric Wedge-Bull mythos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric Wedge-Bull mythos. Show all posts

Don’t You Dare Close My Complaint Because You Invented a Resolution

 ⟡ SWANK Complaint Closure Denial Dispatch ⟡


30 August 2023

You Referenced a Relationship That Doesn’t Exist. That’s Not Closure—It’s Gaslight.


Labels: complaint mishandling, RBKC gaslighting, Eric Wedge-Bull myth, Brett Troyan incident, safeguarding misdirection, SWANK refusal doctrine

I. The Closure Attempt That Failed the Reality Test

On 30 January 2023, RBKC’s FCS Response Service emailed Noelle Bonneannée:

“I understand that you have a very good and positive working relationship with Eric Wedge-Bull, the social worker, and that the complaint regarding Brett has since been sorted.”

They asked:

“Are you happy for us to close the complaint?”

No evidence.
No investigation summary.
Just a fictional relationship used to bury a real complaint.

II. Noelle’s Response: Sent Seven Months Later—and Still Scorching

At 10:51am on 30 August 2023, Noelle replies:

“Do not close this complaint.”
“I made a complaint. I expect you to take it seriously.”
“Apparently you think it's a game. I want the results of my complaint. I expect communication or I will contact my lawyer.”

Each sentence: sharp, spare, surgical.

She does not dignify the invented “good relationship” with a rebuttal.
She strips the exchange of its bureaucratic theatre and returns it to fact.

III. SWANK Principle: Resolution Is Not a Tone. It’s an Outcome.

RBKC’s approach:

  • Ignore the delay

  • Invent rapport

  • Request passive consent to closure

Noelle’s approach:

  • Refuse narrative control

  • Demand procedural truth

  • Threaten escalation—with elegance

Filed under:
complaint closure manipulation, Brett Troyan archive, Eric Wedge-Bull mythos, safeguarding gaslight, RBKC relationship fabrication, SWANK correction letter

© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. Don’t fake a resolution and expect silence in return.

Documented Obsessions