🪞SWANK LOG ENTRY
The Anxiety Inquiry That Was Never Theirs to Make
Or, A Psychiatric Report That Wasn't Ready — But the Diagnosis of the System Was
Filed: 19 November 2024
Reference Code: SWK-MH-RETALIATION-2024-11
PDF Filename: 2024-11-19_SWANK_Letter_Westminster_AnxietyPsychReportMisuse.pdf
One-Line Summary: Polly Chromatic clarifies — yet again — that her anxiety is not a pathology, but a response to ten years of institutional harassment.
I. What Happened
On 19 November 2024, Polly Chromatic sent an email to Westminster and RBKC, requesting the psychiatric report prior to an upcoming meeting — but, more critically, dismantling the repeated attempt to pathologise her emotional response to injustice.
Her tone was direct. Her position was final:
“I don’t have anxiety.
I have anxiety when people keep bullying and harassing me for ten years for no damn reason.”
The psychiatric report wasn’t late — it was irrelevant. The problem is not her mind. It’s their behaviour.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
This email exposes the full procedural irony of the safeguarding industry:
They harass, then diagnose the effects of the harassment.
They gaslight, then pathologise the resistance.
They traumatise, then cite the trauma as proof of risk.
The logic is circular, the evidence is absent, and the process is reputationally bankrupt.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because “anyone would be pissed off” is not an outburst — it’s a perfectly rational footnote to ten years of procedural violence.
Because Westminster continues to commission psychiatric reports as if they’re instruments of clarity, when in fact they are tools of avoidance.
Because Polly does not suffer from a disorder. She suffers from the proximity of professionals who refuse to self-reflect.
This email, like the others, is part of the evidentiary mural: a coherent, articulate refusal to be misdiagnosed by those who cannot diagnose themselves.
IV. Violations
Equality Act 2010 – Psychiatric scrutiny without basis, rooted in disability dismissal
Human Rights Act – Article 8 & Article 3 – Intrusive, degrading assessments
Safeguarding Misuse – Recasting grief and resistance as “mental instability”
Discriminatory Retaliation – Ten years of trauma cited as reason for more
Neglect of Parental Rights – Time wasted, reputations distorted, childhoods lost
V. SWANK’s Position
This email is not a refusal to participate — it is an insistence on integrity.
We consider it a constitutional rejection of psychiatric retaliation dressed in the robes of protection.
To say “I’m anxious when you harass me” is not a symptom — it’s a sentence, and it’s true.
Let the record show: Polly Chromatic has been asking for one thing since the beginning — to be left alone to mother in peace.
And every time she tries, they prescribe her outrage as illness.
We file this to remind the record: grief is not a diagnosis. Harassment is not care. And psychiatry is not a fig leaf for procedural guilt.
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.