Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): medical trauma

Showing posts with label medical trauma. Show all posts

Referral Roulette: Social Services’ Favourite Game

⟡ SWANK Rebuttal Dispatch ⟡

When They Call Again for What You've Already Answered
9 February 2024

No Means Documented: A Formal Refusal of Phone Harassment

I. The Referral Loop That Violates Logic and Law

This dispatch concerns a formal reply from Polly Chromatic to Samira Issa of RBKC Children’s Services, following yet another redundant referral—this time made by Chelsea & Westminster Hospital.

The subject?

An incident that:

Occurred on 2 January 2024 at St. Thomas’ Hospital
Was already reported and discussed
Already inflicted documented trauma

“They are referring me for the same incident that I’ve already spoken with you about.”

This is not procedure. This is institutional memory loss weaponised as policy.

II. A Refusal Grounded in Health and Rights

This is not avoidance. It is medical boundary enforcement.

Polly—diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma—makes the legal and clinical position plain:

Verbal contact is contraindicated
Phone calls exacerbate her condition
Repeated contact for the same matter constitutes harassment

“I am concerned about your mental health given that you continue to harass me for the same things over and over…”

This is not safeguarding. This is a fixation masquerading as duty.

III. Legal Action and Documentation

Polly informs Ms. Issa that:

She has retained legal representation for a medical negligence claim
She intends to pursue legal action for continued safeguarding harassment
She has already submitted documentation—three named attachments covering Erik, Eric, and Rebecca

Her concluding instruction?

“Please refrain from contacting me again.”

The tone is not rude. It is final.

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
The repetition of a question already answered is not concern—it is coercion.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

This Isn’t Academic Failure. It’s Institutional Gaslighting

📚 SWANK Dispatch: You Let Me Take a Final While Sick, Sleep-Deprived, and Parenting Four Kids

🗓️ 4 July 2021

Filed Under: academic discrimination, disabled student barriers, medical amnesty refusal, DRC complaint, FIU GPA retaliation, assignment inflexibility, instructor misconduct, student mother rights, prednisone suppression, exam scheduling abuse

“You let my 4-year-old run around during a 4-hour calculus final
while I was on steroids,
with no warning there’d be other students present,
and called it education.”
— A Mother with a Master's Degree, Repeating Calculus Because of Ableism

This devastating disability rights statement, written by Noelle Bonneannée, was submitted to Stephen Loynaz at Florida International University’s Disability Resource Center (DRC) in an attempt to address the institutional sabotage of her academic performance in a calculus class—despite official accommodations.

🧠 I. Diagnoses and Accommodations Ignored

Officially approved accommodations included:
- Disability-related absences
- Assignment extensions
- Double time on exams
- Minimal distraction room
None of these were respected when it counted:
- The instructor missed her scheduled exam
- Then forced her to take the final exam before her third exam
- While she was on prednisone, sick, and caring for children alone

💣 II. The Institutional Violations

Used grades from 2007–08 to place her on probation in 2021, despite her bachelor's and master's degrees earned since
Instructor insisted on inflexible exam times, despite being fully aware of her chronic illness, asthma, and active flare-ups
Final was administered during her daughter’s waking hours, breaching her minimal distraction accommodation
She rearranged her children’s sleep cycles to fit the university's demands
Instructor gave no prior notice of other students being present
She was rushed to upload the exam three separate times, resulting in unnecessary errors

🧾 III. What She Requested

A retroactive course withdrawal for Summer A Calculus (50680 MAC 2312 RVAA)
Acknowledgement that this failure was not academic, but institutional and medical
Greater DRC advocacy to ensure accommodations are enforceable, not symbolic

👩‍👧 IV. When You Parent and Study While Ill

This is what access looks like for disabled mothers:

Studying at midnight during steroid crashes
Taking finals with toddlers awake
Begging for accommodations you’ve already been granted
Watching GPA penalties erase your degrees

SWANK Summary:

She didn't fail Calculus.
FIU failed her.
And DRC?
They documented it.

I Went to Report Abuse — They Told Me I Was the Criminal

📑 SWANK Dispatch: How to Mismanage a Complaint into a Threat

🗓️ 6 August 2020

Filed Under: complaint misdirection, truancy lies, homeschool sabotage, procedural dishonesty, trauma minimisation, asthma discrimination, policy weaponisation, investigative misconduct

“I brought evidence. They brought back the original threat — with new stationery.”
— A Mother Who Tried Every Proper Channel

On 6 August 2020, Polly Chromatic met with Willette A. Pratt, Senior Investigative Officer of the Complaints Commission, expecting an investigation into her trauma and systemic abuse by the Department of Social Development. What she received was an administrative boomerang: the original truancy threat from 2017 — revived, rebranded, and hurled back at her by the very commission meant to hear her complaint.

🔁 I. The Complaint Was About Trauma. The Response Was a Checklist.

She described the following:

• Her sons were sexually abused by a doctor under state orders.
• Her fence was dismantled.
• Her home was entered illegally during a pandemic.
• She was dragged to hospital under false accusations.

What did Willette Pratt say?

“Your children aren’t approved for homeschool, and they may be taken away.”

📋 II. The New Requirements — Delivered with a Smile

Pratt claimed Polly had spoken to the wrong official in 2017.
Apparently, Mark Garland, Deputy Director of Education, was not “senior enough.”
Despite having:
✓ Met with her
✓ Approved her curriculum
✓ Notified Social Development

Now, she was told to:

• Re-submit all documentation
• Include proof of social interaction
• Hire a teacher to assess her children annually
• Address it to Edgar Howell, Director
• Send it through Pratt (of course)

🧠 III. The Gaslight Was Institutional

“I feel like the entire issue is much bigger than just with the Department of Social Development.”

Indeed. The Complaints Commission had become another arm of the same dysfunction. Rather than investigating the abuse, it pivoted to treating the victim as the problem.

⚖️ Final Position:

“Because obtaining homeschool approval is so important for my children’s well-being… I feel it is necessary to consult an attorney.”

A mother filed a complaint to protect her children.
She left that meeting more endangered than when she arrived.

A Timeline of Harassment Dressed Up as Protection — Filed for the Record

🛑 SWANK Petition: The Human Rights They Pretended Don’t Apply to Homeschooling Mothers

🗓️ 15 July 2020

Filed Under: human rights violations, emergency powers abuse, forced medical examinations, lawful homeschooling, child trauma, privacy breaches, misogynist oversight, procedural corruption

“I filed a curriculum. They sent police.”
— A Mother Whose Children Were Educated, Not Enrolled

On this solemn date, the 15th of July 2020, a ten-page petition was filed with the Human Rights Commission of the Turks and Caicos Islands by Polly Chromatic, a legally approved homeschooling mother, researcher, and writer — whose children were assaulted, her body medically endangered, and her home repeatedly violated under the grotesque excuse of “child welfare.”

Let us be precise.

⚖️ I. The Legal Right to Homeschool — Documented and Ignored

Permission was granted on 26 June 2017 by Mark Garland, yet the Department of Social Development—led by Ashley Adams, Jaala Kennedy, and Ashley Smith—refused to respect this approval.

• Curriculum: submitted yearly
• Degrees: provided (Bachelor + Master’s)
• Income: disclosed
• Communication: constant

Instead of de-escalation, they escalated surveillance. They questioned her about spanking. They challenged her religion. They dismantled her fence.

🏥 II. Medical Assault and the Weaponisation of Hospitals

May 2017: Her sons were sexually abused during an examination at the National Hospital in Grand Turk. The room had nine adults. No privacy. The mother objected — they ignored her. The doctor told her to forcibly retract her children’s foreskin with lotion, a direct violation of UK NHS guidelines, which state:
“Never try to force your son’s foreskin back… it may be painful and damage the foreskin.”

No accountability followed.
Only more visits.

🦠 III. High-Risk Asthma, Emergency Laws Broken, No Excuse

Despite Emergency COVID Powers and her documented eosinophilic asthma, social workers entered her property against her express instructions on 26 March 2020.

The law:
❌ They were not essential workers.
❌ They had no authority to bypass the Emergency Powers.
❌ They endangered her life, knowingly.

🧾 IV. Fundamental Rights Violated (as listed in the Constitution):

🏠 Right to private and family life
📚 Right to education
⚖️ Right to lawful administrative action
🧠 Freedom of conscience and belief
👩‍👧 Protection from inhuman treatment
📢 Freedom of expression
♻️ Environmental beliefs and practice

She did not invent these rights.
They simply failed to respect them.

📅 V. The Timeline That Won’t Be Forgotten

This petition meticulously documented nearly four years of violations, with dozens of emails, hospital visits, and unlawful property entries. It named names. Dates. Laws. Ordinances. Attachments.

It was not a cry for help.
It was a case file.
Bound in evidence. Sealed in truth. Ignored only by cowards.